Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids"
2015 Jan 30
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
If mailbox guids should be unique systemwide, would it be safe to delete all 'dovecot-uidlist' files of the user's mailboxes and then do a doveadm force-resync after mailbox migration?
Thanks!
Christian
----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----------------
Von: Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ]
An: "dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot
2015 Jan 30
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Update: seems to me that the old cyrus mailserver already uses these non-unique mailbox guids.
Is it necessary to have them unique over all private namespaces?
Thanks
Christian
----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----------------
Von:Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ]
An:"dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot at dovecot.org ]
Datum:Thu, 29 Jan 2015
2015 Jan 28
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Dovecot version: 2.2.9
I'm using doveadm backup to migrate about hundred user mailboxes from cyrus to dovecot. I defined a master user for the old cyrus mailserver in imapc backend to get access to all the mailboxes. Now I realized that after migration every user's "Inbox" or "Trash" on the new dovecot server has the same mailbox-guid, e.g:
User a:
inbox dd9456...
2015 Jan 29
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Sorry if this is a duplicate message. I'm new in this mailing list and not sure if the first message really got posted ...
Dovecot version: 2.2.9
We're using doveadm backup to migrate user mailboxes from cyrus to dovecot. I defined a master user for the old cyrus mailserver in imapc backend to get access to all the mailboxes. Now I realized that after migration every user's
2015 Feb 10
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Bump. Can no one give a hint?
Thanks a lot!
Christian
2015 Feb 10
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Ok, problem solved.
Obviously the GUIDs only have to be unique for a specific user account in dovecot.
Many thanks to Heinlein Support who helped me with this question!
2012 Nov 01
1
Modifying mailbox GUIDs?
Greetings all,
I can view a mailbox's GUID like so: doveadm
mailbox status -u guid
However, how may I *modify* a mailbox GUID?
Can this be done using doveadm or some other tool?
If not, how may I
go about modifying the dovecot.mailbox.log (where I assume GUID data is
stored)?
My specific use case has to do with me wanting to modify an
existing mailbox's GUID so that its messages
2012 Jun 22
2
dsync error: "Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs"
I'm getting an error backing up mailboxes. I'm using the mirror
command:
dsync -fvo mail_home=/home/users/bob mirror ssh vmail at 10.1.4.1 dsync -o
mail_home=/home/.incoming_mail_migrations/users/bob
dsync-remote(vmail): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs:
1ef6ee37c694894d783100000581a675 is shared by INBOX and INBOX
dsync-remote(vmail): Error: command BOX-LIST failed
2014 Jun 12
0
A solution : dsync(someuser) Error: Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files
While migrating from mbox to maildir using dsync, I kept running into
a brick wall. Some folders would not sync. The message in stderr was:
Error message GUID: Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files.
This is what solved things for me. I hope this might help someone. Let
me know if I'm completely off sides.
When working with dsync to migrate from mbox to maildir format
mailboxes,
2013 Dec 02
0
"[CANNOT] Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files" when trying to delete folder
Hello,
Dovecot 2.0.9 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago)
location is set to :
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=MEMORY
Index is set to memory due to permissions problems when using disk index.
Everything works, even rename folder, but when trying to delete folder, using any mail client, it fails with:
"[CANNOT] Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent
2011 Feb 17
1
dsync problem: Error: Can't rename mailbox INBOX
Hi all,
I'm running two debian machines with dovecot 2.0.9 autobuilds and would like
to keep mails synchronized on both via dsync.
Mails are kept in maildir on both sides.
While syncing, dsync gives the following error:
dsync-local(jan.binder): Error: Can't rename mailbox INBOX to INBOX_a432bf2eca595a4dba47000043b078f4: Renaming INBOX isn't supported.
dsync-local(jan.binder): Error:
2017 Jul 25
0
failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX/Junk': Permission denied
> For more clarity I also attach the content of
> "/etc/dovecot/conf.d/15-mailboxes.conf"
>
>
> # mailbox Junk {
> # special_use = \Junk
> # }
> # mailbox Trash {
> # special_use = \Trash
> # }
> mailbox INBOX/Junk {
> auto = subscribe
> special_use = \Junk
> }
> mailbox INBOX/Trash {
> auto = subscribe
>
2018 Jan 15
0
Duplicate mail id issue, mailbox does not exist when dovecot tries to generate a new guid so replication can take place
Hello,
Am Montag, 15. Januar 2018, 13:54:22 CET schrieb Daniel Botting:
> Hi all,
>
> When we run the below one user constantly shows as failed (dovecot
> version is 2.2.13):
>
> sudo doveadm replicator status "*"
>
> mail.log shows the below for the user:
>
> Jan 3 16:20:57 hostname dovecot: dsync-server(user): Error: Duplicate
> mailbox GUID
2018 Jan 15
2
Duplicate mail id issue, mailbox does not exist when dovecot tries to generate a new guid so replication can take place
Hi all,
When we run the below one user constantly shows as failed (dovecot
version is 2.2.13):
sudo doveadm replicator status "*"
mail.log shows the below for the user:
Jan? 3 16:20:57 hostname dovecot: dsync-server(user): Error: Duplicate
mailbox GUID <guid number> for mailboxes <mailbox name.sub folder> and
<mailbox name.sub folder> - giving a new GUID <guid
2016 Jan 27
2
Can you "doveadm search" with mailbox location instead of a user (-u option)?
Hey dovecot-users!
doveadm import offers to use i.e. a maildir as source and then import
into a users mailbox referenced via "-u" option. If one wants to import
only certain emails from the source a search-query can be given as well.
I was wondering if doveadm search also does offer to search a mailbox
referenced by filesystem path i.e.
doveadm search
2017 Mar 11
3
Auto create & subscribe folder from Userdb [Was: Users with extra mailbox: namespace/mailbox in userdb lookup?]
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>:
>>
>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
>> and
>>>> subscribed for them.
>>>>
>>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace
>> inbox"
2017 Mar 13
0
Auto create & subscribe folder from Userdb [Was: Users with extra mailbox: namespace/mailbox in userdb lookup?]
On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote:
> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>:
>>>
>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
>>> and
>>>>> subscribed for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is is possible to return an
2017 Mar 11
0
Auto create & subscribe folder from Userdb [Was: Users with extra mailbox: namespace/mailbox in userdb lookup?]
Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>:
>
>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
>and
>>> subscribed for them.
>>>
>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace
>inbox"
>>> containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for
2017 Feb 10
0
dovecot config for 1500 simultaneous connection
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:59:52 -0500 KT Walrus wrote:
> > 1500 IMAP sessions will eat up about 3GB alone.
>
> Are you saying that Dovecot needs 2MB of physical memory per IMAP session?
>
That depends on the IMAP session, read the mailbox size and index size,
etc.
Some are significantly larger:
---
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2019 Jul 05
2
Dovecot and Solr on the same server or on different
On 2019-06-21 09:18, G?tz Reinicke via dovecot wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>> Am 20.06.2019 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Kivalo via dovecot
>> <dovecot at dovecot.org>:
>>
>>> So if dovecot and Solr are good with a host each, I m fine with
>>> managing two VMs.
>> They do. I'm using such a setup for some years now.
>
> May be you you