similar to: Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids"

2015 Jan 30
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Update: seems to me that the old cyrus mailserver already uses these non-unique mailbox guids. Is it necessary to have them unique over all private namespaces? Thanks Christian ----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht----------------- Von:Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ] An:"dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot at dovecot.org ] Datum:Thu, 29 Jan 2015
2015 Jan 30
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
If mailbox guids should be unique systemwide, would it be safe to delete all 'dovecot-uidlist' files of the user's mailboxes and then do a doveadm force-resync after mailbox migration? Thanks! Christian ----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht----------------- Von: Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ] An: "dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot
2015 Jan 29
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Sorry if this is a duplicate message. I'm new in this mailing list and not sure if the first message really got posted ... Dovecot version: 2.2.9 We're using doveadm backup to migrate user mailboxes from cyrus to dovecot. I defined a master user for the old cyrus mailserver in imapc backend to get access to all the mailboxes. Now I realized that after migration every user's
2015 Feb 10
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Ok, problem solved. Obviously the GUIDs only have to be unique for a specific user account in dovecot. Many thanks to Heinlein Support who helped me with this question!
2015 Feb 02
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Can no one give some adivse on this issue? Thanks Christian
2015 Feb 10
0
Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids
Bump. Can no one give a hint? Thanks a lot! Christian
2012 Nov 01
1
Modifying mailbox GUIDs?
Greetings all, I can view a mailbox's GUID like so: doveadm mailbox status -u guid However, how may I *modify* a mailbox GUID? Can this be done using doveadm or some other tool? If not, how may I go about modifying the dovecot.mailbox.log (where I assume GUID data is stored)? My specific use case has to do with me wanting to modify an existing mailbox's GUID so that its messages
2014 Jun 12
0
A solution : dsync(someuser) Error: Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files
While migrating from mbox to maildir using dsync, I kept running into a brick wall. Some folders would not sync. The message in stderr was: Error message GUID: Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files. This is what solved things for me. I hope this might help someone. Let me know if I'm completely off sides. When working with dsync to migrate from mbox to maildir format mailboxes,
2013 Dec 02
0
"[CANNOT] Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files" when trying to delete folder
Hello, Dovecot 2.0.9 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) location is set to : mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=MEMORY Index is set to memory due to permissions problems when using disk index. Everything works, even rename folder, but when trying to delete folder, using any mail client, it fails with: "[CANNOT] Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent
2012 Jun 22
2
dsync error: "Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs"
I'm getting an error backing up mailboxes. I'm using the mirror command: dsync -fvo mail_home=/home/users/bob mirror ssh vmail at 10.1.4.1 dsync -o mail_home=/home/.incoming_mail_migrations/users/bob dsync-remote(vmail): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs: 1ef6ee37c694894d783100000581a675 is shared by INBOX and INBOX dsync-remote(vmail): Error: command BOX-LIST failed
2012 Jul 17
1
[PATCH 01/15] Drivers: hv: Format GUIDS as per MSFT standards
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:34:06PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > Format GUIDS as per MSFT standard. This makes interacting with MSFT > > tool stack easier. [] > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c [] > > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static ssize_t vmbus_show_device_attr(struct device *dev, >
2012 Jul 17
1
[PATCH 01/15] Drivers: hv: Format GUIDS as per MSFT standards
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:34:06PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > Format GUIDS as per MSFT standard. This makes interacting with MSFT > > tool stack easier. [] > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c [] > > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static ssize_t vmbus_show_device_attr(struct device *dev, >
2017 Jul 01
0
fsck looping duplicate mdbox GUIDs
I have recently updated with 2.2.29.1-avh1~xenial1 ubuntu package on 16.04. It appears that I have a couple of duplicate GUIDs which fsck can't clear so the machine is looping through doing continuous fsck runs. Any way to determine what the offending messages are and how to delete or otherwise stop this? Jul 1 17:09:24 post dovecot: doveadm(djk at tobit.co.uk): Warning: fscking index
2014 Jun 04
0
uids/guids differ on new debian server
Hello, got a Debian-Linux Server (Squeeze) which is running fine with samba version 3.5.6. > getent passwd |grep userx gives: userx:*:10182:10005:user, x:/home/DOMAIN/userx:/bin/false now there is another new installed debian server (Wheezy) which should replace the old one. Installed samba (3.6.6) and winbind, joined the domain and showing the users with wbinfo -u works well. But the
2023 Mar 09
0
Backend doesn't support GUIDs
Hi, Have some old dboxes where doveadm sync fails with "Backend doesn't support GUIDs, sync with header hashes instead". The error is right after reading from the folder dovecot.index.log.2. The dovecot version is 2.3.10. Any fix/workaround for the error?
2016 Nov 08
0
A lot of duplicate GUIDS.
Recently I have in logs a LOT of messages like this: [....] Nov 06 19:39:36 IMAP(kjonca): Error: mdbox /home/kjonca/Mail/1/storage: Duplicate GUID 13511 in m.1530:845670 (size=2622) and m.1371:1831730 (size=916) Nov 06 19:39:36 IMAP(kjonca): Error: mdbox /home/kjonca/Mail/1/storage: Duplicate GUID 13512 in m.1530:847414 (size=2274) and m.1371:1832476 (size=1069) Nov 06 19:39:36 IMAP(kjonca):
2012 Dec 14
1
[PATCH] Add support for getting and setting GPT partition type GUIDs
New APIs: part_set_gpt_type part_get_gpt_type --- appliance/packagelist.in | 1 + daemon/parted.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 30 +++++++++++ generator/tests_c_api.ml | 7 +++ generator/types.ml | 5 ++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 6 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2012 Jun 06
1
Default value for case sensitive on uniqueness validator
Hello, The uniqueness validator was always case sensitive but that seems wrong because we want uniqueness validations to be insensitive in most of the time. Do not make more sense be insensitive by default and set sensitive only where it should be? We are migrating a lot of big applications from mysql to postgresql here and we are setting case sensitive to false on **all** uniqueness
2005 Oct 21
4
Validate uniqueness on two columns
I would like to validate the uniqueness of two columns together. I have last and first names as separate columns. What is the Rails Way to do this? Thanks, Jared Nuzzolillo _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
2013 Apr 03
1
validates uniqueness scope allow_blank/allow_nil -> validation error
I have this in a model: class GenreBadge < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :game, counter_cache: :genre_badges_count, touch: true belongs_to :genre validates :game_id, uniqueness: {scope: :genre_id}, allow_blank: true end When I get one existing genre badge genre_badge = game.genre_badges.first genre_badge.game_id = nil genre_badge.save! It creates an validation exception: