similar to: Dovecot Director and Dovecot proxy

Il 18/07/19 21:42, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On 18 Jul 2019, at 11.44, Alessio Cecchi via dovecot > <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and >> director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) >> >> Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director

Hi, after the upgrade to Dovecot 2.3 for our director ring we found some times in the log errors like this: Mar 18 14:22:51 Panic: imap-login: file iostream-openssl.c: line 599 (openssl_iostream_handle_error): assertion failed: (errno != 0) Mar 18 14:22:51 Fatal: imap-login: master: service(imap-login): child 1726 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled -

Great news!!! I just didn't see anything in the changelog referring to "trust relationship," based on what the papper below show. https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaXP2018-Slides/StefanMetzmacher_sambaxp2018_trusted_domain_support-rev0-compact.pdf Any news about trusts? On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:41 PM Johannes Engel via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

Hi, I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director and after also Backend. Can works fine a ring of director with mixed 2.2 and 2.3 version? Mi idea is to setup a new Director server with 2.3, stop one server with 2.2 and insert the new 2.3 in the current ring to check if works fine. If all

Hello R users, I would like to generate "slanted" stacked bar graphs like those on the bottom of pages 1 and 2 in this document: http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/JMP-Snapshot-SWA-HLM.pdf . I've also attached the file to this email (pdf). Does anyone know if this is possible in R? I have tried googling and searching the R help archives, and it seems like ggplot2

Hello Rowland Am 17.02.2015 um 06:14 schrieb Jed Evnull: > I recently compiled samba-3.2.15 for a Raspberry Pi V2 and while it > seems to be working fine, when I ps aux | grep smbd I'm shown two or > three successively numbered smbd jobs. The smbd log isn't showing > anything weird, what's up with this? Everything is fine. smbd create child processes, like when users or

Ah, ok. Maybe you can do something with the static id mappings on the server. Map a computer to user But besides that, uhm, good luck... Stick with the login popup, and save yourself a lot of troubles. Maybe this wil give you a good hint, https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaXP2018-Slides/StefanMetzmacher_sambaxp2018_trusted_domain_support-rev0-compact.pdf Imo, a hard one to

Hi Timo, here you can see two images with the load average and CPU usage with Dovecot 2.2 (Centos 6) and 2.3 (Centos 7) on the same hardware and same configuration: https://imgur.com/a/1hsItlc Load average increment is relevant but CPU usage is similar. Il 22/07/19 18:49, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On 22 Jul 2019, at 17.45, Alessio Cecchi <alessio at skye.it > <mailto:alessio

On 17/02/15 12:15, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Rowland > > Am 17.02.2015 um 06:14 schrieb Jed Evnull: >> I recently compiled samba-3.2.15 for a Raspberry Pi V2 and while it >> seems to be working fine, when I ps aux | grep smbd I'm shown two or >> three successively numbered smbd jobs. The smbd log isn't showing >> anything weird, what's up with

Thanks for the feedback Andrew!!! Maybe in 4.9.1 appear? :) On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:44 PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 19:39 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Great news!!! > > > > I just didn't see anything in the changelog referring to "trust > > relationship," based on what the papper below

Am 18.09.18 um 16:33 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Ah, ok. > > Maybe you can do something with the static id mappings on the server. > Map a computer to user > > But besides that, uhm, good luck... > Stick with the login popup, and save yourself a lot of troubles. > > Maybe this wil give you a good hint, >

Hi, The measurements were created under the following conditions : ? operating system : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.6 (Santiago) kernel in version 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 ? virtual server (VMware) with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) 4vCPU E5649 x 2,526 GHz (2 cores per virtual socket) and 4 GB RAM ? 7,200 RPM SATA 1TB (FC SAN IBM System Storage N3400) ? all file systems had been formated in

> On 2015-02-17 13:26, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 17/02/15 12:15, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>> Hello Rowland >>> >>> Am 17.02.2015 um 06:14 schrieb Jed Evnull: >>>> I recently compiled samba-3.2.15 for a Raspberry Pi V2 and while it >>>> seems to be working fine, when I ps aux | grep smbd I'm shown two or= > >>>> three

Hello dovecot! I administer a dovecot installation with 30k users. I've got 4 dovecot directors as frontend and 10 backends. The mailbox are now in maildir format, with maildir++ quota, on a shared netapp filer. Indexes are local on each backend. I'm reconfiguring the quota plugin: as a first step, I want to use the clone plugin to keep a copy of the quota on a redis database. Next,

Hi Mason, On 9/26/20 9:34 AM, Mason Schmitt via samba wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I'm very interested in using Windows Hello for Business in small business > environments, with Samba as the AD DC. > good luck I got it kind of working with :1 samba DC, 1 windows 2012 DC, 1 windows 2016 ADFS > > I'm sorry that I don't have great news. The schema upgrade is the easy

> > Is this all that would be required to enable a deployment based upon a > > traditional PKI? > > > If you are using windows yes, if not then you would need to find a way > to replace the EDRS (there is a good doc about it here > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-how-it-works-provisioning > ) >

In data mercoled? 18 marzo 2020 23:08:27 CET, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: > Ciao Simone, > > why you want each backend to recalc quota only for its managed users and > not run "doveadm quota recalc -A" only one time from a backend tha > recalc quota for all users? > Because the indexes are local to the backends. If I make the recalc from one backend only, that one

Dear all, After using samba 3 for two years, I have just spent totally one week finishing setting up a samba 4 file system in my working school. There are about 200 computers, 80+ staff, 1000 students and 10 printers. The AD was properly setup, mandatory profile and one GPO policy (which is printer download trust) is effective for all users. Logon script is for mapping four shares and 10

Hai Viktor, I dont know or can't tell if this setup can use the windows indexing, i havent looked in to that. I dont use windows indexer. But i do know if you setup as shown and you add a webpage to the server, that makes is also usable for Windows users to search. There was some work done in the area

On 2015-02-17 13:26, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 17/02/15 12:15, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> Hello Rowland >> >> Am 17.02.2015 um 06:14 schrieb Jed Evnull: >>> I recently compiled samba-3.2.15 for a Raspberry Pi V2 and while it >>> seems to be working fine, when I ps aux | grep smbd I'm shown two or >>> three successively numbered smbd jobs. The smbd