similar to: Sieve counterpart of IMAP SPECIAL-USE

On 2014-12-29 20:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: > For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE > capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you > suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the > METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4). > Unfortunately, both of these features are not yet supported

On 12/29/2014 9:24 PM, Peter Mogensen wrote: > On 2014-12-29 20:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE >> capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you >> suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the >> METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4).

Hi, Great to see Thunderbird support SPECIAL-USE now. I would like to hear the list about the intended use of SPECIAL-USE. I get the impression from several earlier mails here that the intention is for the server to globally decide what the folder-name of a specific SPECIAL-USE folder is for all users. That's the way the documentation exemplifies it and what I get from posts like this:

On 4/7/2015 10:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > I have another sieve question, this time about setting variables. > > I join a lot of mailing lists at ietf.org. I thought it'd be handy to > filter these all into a common folder and then into individual > folders, without having to configure each mailing list independently. > > So wrote this (this is just a

Hmmm, confusing, clients should then display the mailbox name redirected by the server. If a user in a front end just sees the 'Junk E-mail', that is the name he is going to be using in his mailbox rules. If he does not know that this is actually the Junk folder on the server, he will make an incorrect message rule. So I guess you have to correct this server side, before storing

Hello, I'm using dovecot 1.1.1 and dovecot-sieve-1.1.5 . I'm very interested in the notify plugin, I've tried many code which have generated some errors (coding errors that have been arrived in the .dovecot.sieve.err) but these errors are fixed. But Notify is still not working, I've the following in mail.log :deliver(webmaster at xxx.net): SIEVE ERROR: Unknown [unimplemented]

Hi, I have another sieve question, this time about setting variables. I join a lot of mailing lists at ietf.org. I thought it'd be handy to filter these all into a common folder and then into individual folders, without having to configure each mailing list independently. So wrote this (this is just a part, obviously): require ["envelope", "variables",

I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist. dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl]

Op 3/24/2018 om 9:16 AM schreef Andr? Rodier: > Dear all, > > I have found a way to automatically copy sent emails in the "Sent" > folder, but I am not sure it is the simplest and more reliable way on > the long term. > > I am open to suggestions if I miss a feature in Dovecot - or Postfix, > that allows me to do this. I vaguely remember an SMTP extension that do

On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote: > I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains > that the folder Spam does not exist. > > dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script > /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user > logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) So, does that

On 16/04/2020 23:38, Marc Roos wrote: > It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail > clients. > > # spam folders merging > mailbox Junk { > special_use = \Junk > auto = create > } > mailbox Spam { > special_use = \Junk > auto = no > } > mailbox "Junk E-mail" { > special_use

On 2/12/2015 2:12 AM, Florin Portase wrote: > > On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote: > >> On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: >>> On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>>> On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: >>>>> Hello guys, >>>>> >>>>> I'm having troubles making

Hello! With many MTAs it is possible to use a special form of adressing: subaddresses or "plussed addresses". For sendmail you can read some information on http://www.sendmail.org/m4/misc_features.html http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking/sendmail/ch24_04.htm#SML2-CH-24-SECT-4-3 In a sieve filter you can analyse these special detail values, the syntax is described in RFC3598

It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail clients. # spam folders merging mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk auto = create } mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } mailbox "Junk E-mail" { special_use = \Junk auto = no } On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote: > I do not have the log file anymore from the

Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core

On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: Hello guys, > > I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: > > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1 [1]]

Hi Folks, I'm looking for details of Dovecot's Sieve support. Specifically, Support for Sieve scripts (RFC 3028) and the protocol for remotely managing Sieve scripts, including: -- draft-martin-managesieve-06.txt -- draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-05.txt And the following Sieve actions: -- fileinto -- redirect -- imapflags Thanks, Robb Beal -- www.laszlosystems.com --

On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: > On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: >>> >> Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the >> "keep" action

What about extension "mailbox"? https://wiki.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5490#section-3 A simple example (not tested, but should work): note:? + I use '/' instead of '.' as hierarchical separator + stop; stops the whole script, but you could use elsif instead. require ["fileinto", "mailbox"]; if header :contains

On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: >> > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1] is executed or when the implicit "keep" [2] is still >