similar to: ZFS fails with latest C8 kernel

-----Original Message----- From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:57:49 -0400 On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 10:20, david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > <snip>

Am 16.06.20 um 22:04 schrieb Fabian Arrotin: > On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004). >> >> Installed kernels are >> kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 >> >>

Hi all, I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004). Installed kernels are kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 Unfortunately I can not boot into the latest kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64. After grub2 screen I only see following line: EFI stub: UEFI Secure Boot is enabled Booting into the older

><snip> > >> Yes .. it should be on mirror.centos.org now .. you could change the > >> repo where your updates come from.? OR .. wait for that mirror to get > >> updated. > > > > > > I just did > > yum clean all > > yum update > > > > and 15-8 showed up.? Maybe the 'clean all' > did it, or maybe just

I'm building a new storage server. I was unable to use the CentOS-8- x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso image written to a 256GB thumb drive. It kept failing the integrity check. I had to use the much smaller CentOS-8- x86_64-1905-boot.iso image and do a network install from a mirror site. That's a first for me. Even though I selected "Server with GUI", the resulting installation boots to a

On 8/1/20 5:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > I would wait and install everything as a group. We should have > something soon. First off, Johnny and all of the rest of the CentOS team, thank you for your efforts! Second, to all with this problem, I too experienced the issue (I posted on the CentOS-Devel list my findings).? To those who seem to think more testing could have prevented

I see that Pinguy OS, an uber-Ubuntu o/s, includes native ZFS support. Any pointers to more info on this? -- David

On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed > is > to recompile those in EPEL. I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the latest v1.22. Is there any reason I should not try the latest? Perhaps some dependencies not available in C8? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > ripping > the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical packages? I've attached a capture of "dnf erase *mate*" that shows the 104 packages

What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I don't think), I'm still booted to kernel 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64, and there are no other kernels installed.

Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license. I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS. From

Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto: > I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't > tried): > > http://zfsonlinux.org/ > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS > > to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page: > > https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/ > > unless someone with

Hi all, I have some AVC in the logs and wonder how to resolve this: Under EL8 (enforcing SElinux) I have /var/lib/php/session mounted as tmpfs. # tail -1 /etc/fstab tmpfs /var/lib/php/session tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=770,gid=apache,size=16777216,context="system_u:object_r:httpd_var_run_t:s0" 0 0 # df -a |grep php tmpfs 16384 0 16384 0%

Hi everybody, I'm looking for information about using GlusterFS with ZFS. I got information that talked about a sort of incompatibility between the both technologies because of unsupported xattr feature in ZFS. What are the latest news about this ? Thank you in advance.

Am 16.06.20 um 22:04 schrieb Fabian Arrotin: > On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004). >> >> Installed kernels are >> kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 >> >>

Hi, i am using Savage Beast 2.3 plugin for the forum and i got and error undefined method `has_many'' for Object:Class C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 9:in `included'' C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 7:in `class_eval'' C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 7:in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2649 Bug ID: 2649 Summary: Problem with reverse tunnel between SSH client 5.5p1 and SSH server > 6.4p1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so we're contemplating switching to ZFS. As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux http://zfsonlinux.org/ calls itself production ready despite a version number of 0.6.2, and

I have been using CentOS on my laptop for a few days now and it works great! Great work-around for the Fedora GNOME 3 debacle. But I'm starting to miss Google Chrome pretty seriously. Firefox is just not what it once was. It's slow. Spell check is weak. Sometimes it straight up fails to display pages after going "back". There are numerous details like this that just make FF

Hi list, I'm on C8.1 and I'm trying to install NVIDIA driver from rpmfusion-nonfree repository but it returns: ?package kmod-nvidia-3:440.82-2.el8.x86_64 requires kmod-nvidia-4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64 >= 3:440.82-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed ? - conflicting requests ? - nothing provides kernel < 4.18.0-148.el8 needed by