similar to: Bridge network for virt-manager

Ok so I have used virt-manager to create the name NET100 This is what shows. <network> <name>NET100</name> <uuid>1ba45e54-93c2-f291-8b35-a7fe8cae9ac1</uuid> <forward dev='eth0' mode='nat'> <interface dev='eth0'/> </forward> <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0' /> <mac

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=192.168.255.255 DEVICE=eth1:192 IPADDR=192.168.0.1 IPV6INIT=no MTU="" NAME="LAN - Non-routable" NETMASK=255.255.0.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0

Dear Centos-Virt: This is actually a second request for help on the same issue. I finally got to try what several months ago was replayed to me and no joy was to be had. I am afraid the original thread got stale and also had extra, unnecessary data in it. Guest=XP Pro, SP2 Host=CentOS5; # uname -r; 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 VirtualBox-1.5.0_24069_rhel5-2.i586.rpm

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

Hi, I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any success. Here is my configuration: ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 USERCTL=no ifcfg-bridge0: DEVICE=br0

On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible > to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have > tried works. > > The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest > networking during the install. "All documentation" doesn't leave out this

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > > hi users > > > > > > I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is Centos > > 7.2 > > Dhcpd would not start, complaining like this: > > >   > Is virbr0 created by libvirt as part of one of its "virtual >

Here is the relevant log snippet: journal: libvirt version: 1.2.8, package: 16.el7_1.3 (CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org>, 2015-05-12-20:12:58, worker1.bsys.centos.org) journal: failed to connect to monitor socket: No such process journal: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: ((null):1937): Spice-Warning **: reds.c:3036:reds_init_socket:

Dear Centos-Virt: Help! Guest=XP Pro, SP2 Host=CentOS5; # uname -r; 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 VirtualBox-1.4.0_21864_rhel5-1.i586 http://www.virtualbox.org/download/1.5.0/VirtualBox-1.5.0_24069_rhel5-1.i586.rpm.run I have two nic: eth0 is the internal network; eth1 connects to a DSL modem. I also have a fully functioning DHCP server on eth0 (works perfectly with Parallels for Linux). The directions

What is the correct combination of packages to configure and manage VMs via virt-manager undet CentOS-5.4? If I use qemu then while virt-manager works I obtain SELinux alerts with respect to the real-time clock. If instead of qemu I use kvm-qemu-img then virt-manager simply does not work. It starts but it does not find any form of qemu and the selection boxes are all greyed out. Further, do I

Hi, I have installed CentOS 6.2 x86_64 and KVM/Qemu and I have some troubles with network. The first case: ----------------- The configuration is: - CentOS 6.2 (hardware machine) has one Ethernet interface with static IP address (eth0). - Virtual machine has bridge network interface with eth0 interface on CentOS 6.2. This bridge is created using wizard integrated with virt-manager. - Bridge

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

I upgraded from CentOS 5.9 to CentOS 6.4. I try to reuse my virtual machines and am only partially successful: I can run them, I just cannot get the network OK and need some help with that. What I had in the past was pretty simple: both the host and the VM's used eth0 and each had an IP in the same subnet and could communicate freely. With the new install it seems somewhat more complex and I

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

Hi All, I am working on a mystery. I am using openvpn-2.1_beta7-gui-1.0.3-install on all the computers in question. All computers are running XP-Pro-SP2. (Mine is running in a virtual window -- details below.) This configuration works perfectly from my office. I use it to call five facilities: remote aa.bb.cc.dd port 5030 proto udp dev tap ifconfig 192.168.240.30 255.255.255.0 secret

Dear Simon, > And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. # pwd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts # diff -u ifcfg-eno1 ifcfg-eno4 --- ifcfg-eno1??? 2020-09-21 17:23:25.576672703 +0200 +++ ifcfg-eno4??? 2020-09-22 07:18:43.160532532 +0200 @@ -3,15 +3,20 @@ ?BROWSER_ONLY=no ?BOOTPROTO=none ?DEFROUTE=no -IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes -IPV6INIT=no -IPV6_AUTOCONF=no +IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no

In honor of Xen Doc Day, I've put up some basic HOWTOs for setting up bridging on CentOS 6 and 7. I'm far from an expert, so I'd appreciate any feedback. The howtos can be found here: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Networking6 https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Networking7 -George

I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions messing with me. So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have NETWORKING_IPV6=yes. In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I altered ifcfg-eth0, setting BOOTPROTO=none. That was enough for eth0 to only have IPv6 working on it (have IPV6INIT=yes and IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes). But lo had IPv4. So I commented

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet