similar to: IPv6 inbound routing

On 4/28/2020 4:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<name>? I wonder if you > have IPv6 disabled. Pasted below. V6 definitely works. I have a second server and gave it a WAN address and I can connect between them using their WAN addresses. That's what told me that my ip6tables weren't screwed up and that the problem lay elsewhere.

On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > - gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > default route comes from RA) I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN interface. I do see RA's emitting from the LAN interface, from radvd. Is there

I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. I'm not seeing any IPv6 default route on the WAN interface. I suspect I'm not getting route announcements. I

--On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 10:16 PM -0500 Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > I didn't get that you have a static assignment (presumably a business > connection) - they may not do RAs on that (I don't at my ISP job). > Business connections (or at least, connections with static assignments) > tend to operate differently. For that, they should have given you a

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >- gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > > default route comes from RA) > > I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 > of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried > to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a > gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. > > I'm not seeing any

the man page for RADVD says: radvd is the router advertisement daemon for IPv6. It listens to router solicitations and sends router advertisements as described in "Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)" (RFC 2461). With these advertise- ments hosts can automatically configure their addresses and some other parameters. They also can choose

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > I'm using OpenWrt at home and it's working mostly fine there. Except > with my Android phone. I'm not getting a DNS setting for V6, but I > do have the setting in the router's config file. The Win10 clients > work fine, though. Apparently Android has issues with DHCPv6, and > I'm betting

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 Summary: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

hi It was not working when i applied the rules on the vpn card. But I wondered if maybe bridging of vpn and eth0 was messing this up. I thought it was enough to only apply it to the vpn card root at JOTVPN:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled    interfaces bridge 8000.000c29638a7e no           eth0                                                                   vpn so I tried the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851 Summary: IPv6 SNAT target with --random doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

19. Juli 2017 17:19, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > 19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > >> 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: >> >>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >> <snip/> >> >> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration: >> thomas@vm02-fai:~$

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:51:49PM +0000, Håvard Rabbe wrote: > thank you for looking in to this. I haven't tried it before now. I cant get it to work. > > after running the commands you suggest I get this when I run ip6tables --list-rules > > root at JOTVPN:~# ip6tables --list-rules > -P INPUT ACCEPT > -P FORWARD ACCEPT > -P OUTPUT ACCEPT > -A FORWARD -i vpn -p

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1343 Bug ID: 1343 Summary: With iPv6 masquerade, ICMPv6 time-exceeded pkts are forwarded with bad checksum Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >>> <snip/> >>> >>> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration: >>> thomas@vm02-fai:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces >>> # This

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > I discovered that IPv6 is sort of working when I got an email > rejection from Comcast for not having an IPv6 PTR record. I > discovered I could telnet to port 25 on their MX server over IPv6! I > then found I could tracroute6 to them, but I couldn't to my Linode > VPS in Fremont. It gets to the data

Hi, I have three squeeze servers running: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the e1000e driver and the other two use the igb driver. They've been in production for around 6 months now