similar to: Understanding modularity

> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >> picture >> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >> >> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM >> packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package

> Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS: >>> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >>>> picture >>>> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >>>> >>>> What I'm most

On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Hi, > > I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big picture > somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. > > What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM > packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package which says > it belongs to a module or

Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS: >> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >>> picture >>> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >>> >>> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 3:18 PM Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > > Il 2023-01-12 16:10 Josh Boyer ha scritto: > > Modules are one of several packaging formats we have. With CentOS > > Stream 9/ RHEL 9, we took user and customer feedback on how the > > default versions of software are packaged and determined that the > > defaults should be normal

On 07/28/2017 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:11:53PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote: >> The issue I have here is even if I did file a bug, and the issue >> were fixed, no sooner than it's fixed fedora updates to the next >> version and introduces a whole bunch of new bugs, and so the cycle >> continues. I played that game for a while with

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:02 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: Ultimately, the Red Hat teams are using modularity where they believe > it makes sense and using regular packaging to reduce complexity for > customers where it doesn't provide much benefit. > Thanks for the explanation. For those who want to know more, here is the documentation I used when I was trying

> > Simon and others > Here's a very simple and hopefully reproducible test-case > > Select as your boot ISO: > ?CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > Choose to reclaim all space on the disk > Choose 'Minimal Install' as the software selection > Connect yourself to the network (I use a wired connection) > Don't bother creating a user, just provide your

I have made a analysis of rails that analysis the modularity of the framework and find replicated code "bloat". You can find the result in http://shs.demosophia.net/rails_bloat.tar.bz2 . Read the README.txt in the archive. It have interest for people, thats write or maintain classes and modules in the rails framework. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received

RA2:YR is a 2D game - I think it probably uses DirectDraw. It runs slower with 0.9.16 and now the in game cursor flickers. Besides minor audio problems it ran fine in 0.9.15. I tried setting HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wine\Direct3D\DirectDrawRenderer to "gdi". It made no difference. Is that the corrent way to turn off the new DirectDraw changes?

Hi everyone, I am using the fastgreedy.community function to get the $merges matrix and the $modularity vector. This serves my purpose of testing modularity of my graph. But I am "greedy" to plot the heat map and dendrrogram based on the $merges dendogram matrix. I know that heatplot does the graphics part but I am not sure if the dendogram generated by the heatplot will match the one

At 03:46 PM 1/23/2020, Nataraj wrote: >On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote: > > > > I would agree.? I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development > > system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.? I have not added > > any repositories other then the Redhat > > codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms. I original installed 8.0 and > > have

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02

I am digging a bit into RHEL 7 roadmap info. It seems there are statements that RHEL 7 will only support 64 bit. Is this corrent, and what for Centos 7? Also the ARM info I found was the target is ARMv8 which is 64 bit, not the ARMv7 which is 32bit. Any clearification is appreciated.

I am building a new workstation based on EL8 now. As someone else here mentioned, the raw EL8 distribution is unusable as a workstation. Therefore I am building lot of additional packages. Today I came across a problem with a custom package with an Epoch version, that kills the yum/dnf update process (it tries to find a "best" package etc.). My actually question; is the RPM Epoch

I am looking at writing a program using php that after X number of days (eg 60 days) a speex file is created that has all the speex file in a set folder with a bit of text to speech between the file for id reasons the speex file in the folder are deleted once done based on what I have read (corrent me if Im wrong): I need to convert the speex files to wav files (executable program), then I can

Dear all, my aim is to estimate the efficacy over time of a treatment for headache prevention. Data consist of long sequences of repeated binary outcomes (1 if the subject has at least 1 episode of headache , 0 otherwise) on subjects randomized to placebo or treatment. I have fit a logistic regression model with Huber-White cluster sandwich covariance estimator. I have put in the model the

Hi, for a backup program I have to find all differing files (including metadata) in two snapshots taken from the same subvolume. Having looked at the find-new command I thought about this process: 1. Get the two transids when the two snapshots were created. 2. Query modifications to the original subvolume between the two transids. Is the general process corrent or have I overseen

Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the standard distribution (as far as I know), so I issue as root: yum -y --enablerepo rpmfusion-free-updates install ffmpeg fuse-exfat exfat-utils and that works just fine. The ffmpeg functionality works; I haven't tested exfat yet.

On 07/30/2017 09:41 AM, Walter H. wrote: > On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work >> on all the time learning/testing. I just seamlessly upgraded it from >> Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 using a couple of dnf commands .. awesome >> experience actually. > because of this feature to upgrade from one