similar to: CentOS repo question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "CentOS repo question"

2020 Apr 22
2
CentOS repo question
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just
2020 Apr 22
0
CentOS repo question
On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. > > I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and > CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I > just have the Appstream repos enabled. > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating
2020 Apr 23
0
CentOS repo question
On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > > > >> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Just as a followup even g++ is broken: [piot at paris ~]$ g++ bash: g++: command not found... Install package 'gcc-c++' to provide command 'g++'? [N/y] y * Waiting in queue... The following packages have to be downgraded: cpp-8.2.1-3.5.el8.x86_64 The C Preprocessor glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.i686 The GNU libc libraries glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.x86_64 The GNU libc libraries
2020 Nov 08
0
dbus packages' versions not making sense
I have installed 1.12.8-10.el8_2, but when trying to install dbus-devel it is not available for that version, only 1.12.8-9.el8, which is also not available. Suggestions? # yum list | grep dbus dbus.x86_64 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2 @BaseOS dbus-common.noarch 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for
2020 Jan 16
0
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Philippe, What's the output with '--allowerasing' switch? We are experiencing a similar issue, dnf update: ... Problem 53: problem with installed package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 - package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires perl-Encode(x86-64) = 4:2.97-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Encode-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires
2020 Jan 16
3
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but
2018 Aug 19
4
Adding minimal target support to build clang
Hi! In Debian, we have recently run into the situation that the package qttools-opensource-src has added LLVM's clang parser as a build dependency with the effect that the package can no longer be built for a couple of architectures like alpha or ia64 [1]. >From my current understanding, qttools-opensource-src is merely using the parser part in clang to parse C/C++ code for code analysis
2020 Jan 16
0
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 09:48, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > No it did not work; see: > [piot at paris ~]$ sudo dnf install --nobest --allowerasing gcc-c++ > Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:24 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 08:28:51 AM CST. > Error: > Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers
2024 Mar 14
0
CentOS Virt SIG and packages' priority problems?
Hello, some days ago I followed these instructions https://sigs.centos.org/virt/tdx/host/ and after enabling the repo I installed the tdx necessary bits as indicated, with the command dnf install kernel-tdx qemu-kvm-tdx libvirt-tdx This gave me: libvirt 9.5.0-1.el9s qemu-kvm 8.0.0-15.el9s kernel 5.14.0-395.el9s But now if I run a usual "dnf update" I'm proposed
2020 Feb 21
1
bcc tools and bpftrace packages misbuilt?
After upgrading to 8.1.1911, bcc-tools and bpftrace seem to be broken. Current package versions I have: bpftrace-0.9-3.el8.x86_64 and bcc-tools-0.8.0-4.el8.x86_64 Both of these seem to be pulling in LLVM version 7, rather than the version 8 that is in 8.1.1911: [root at localhost ~]# bpftrace bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libclangFrontend.so.7: cannot open shared object file:
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02
2020 Jun 07
2
EPEL repository: Failure to download metadata
Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10
2014 Oct 26
1
Update from 6.5 to 6.6 breaks epel qt5
Just a heads up, if anyone is doing QT development with the EPEL RPMs, the update from RHEL 6.5 to 6.6 breaks the current qt5 RPMS. In fact, I had to uninstall qt5 to perform the update. I've submitted a bug report upstream, so hopefully it'll get resolved before too much longer. In the interim, you either get to update, or you get to stop your qt5 development ...
2020 Aug 05
3
CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??
On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: >> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >>> >>>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>>> a resource? >>>> >>> CentOS
2020 Apr 30
1
GNS3 installation docs for CentOS 8
Am 30.04.20 um 03:16 schrieb Earl Ramirez: > >> Does anyone have GNS3 installation guide for CentOS 8? > This was validated in a KVM > > - Install dependencies > $ sudo dnf -y install platform-python-devel qt5-qtbase python3-qt5 > - Download and install dynamips and ubridge > ubridge-0.9.14-5.fc30.x86_64.rpm [ >
2019 May 18
1
CentOS 6/EPel: Missing EPel package?
The EPel repo has a *nearly* complete collection of QT5 packages. One important one that *seems* to be missing: qmake. There does not seem to be a package containing qmake in the collection of QT5 packages for CentOS 6! I guess I can find the source code and build it (somehow)... -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
2020 May 07
2
libQt5Core.so ver 5.12
Hello, For the last few days, 'dnf upgrade' on my Centos 8 installation has been showing problems saying that it cannot install the best update candidates for packages (kf5-*) because nothing provides libQtCore.so.5(Qt_5.12). My system shows that it presently has libQtCore.so.5(Qt_5.11). I've been keeping the system up to date using the --nobest option in dnf. I could download
2019 Nov 25
1
yum4 and dnf on CentOS 8
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>