similar to: C8 and backup solution

Hi list, I'm searching a valid backup system to perform backups of 3 server, one local and 2 remote, and 2 linux workstation. (this number could be higher in future). Currently I'm testing bacula, scripted rsync with hardlink and borgbackup on C8.1. Bacula works without any problem, well tested, solid but complex to configure. Tested on a single server (with volumes on disk) and? a

There is no known fix to the F0 0F C7 C8 bug at this time. What can be done, however, is run a program, such as the script after my signature, to locate any and all such programs. This script can be used in single user mode after a mysterious lockup on a multiuser Pentium system. I hope it is possible to come up with a software fix for this problem. - Sam "You can...turn sadness into

Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Hi all, > > > I still use the following kickstart partition scheme for C7 installations > (via virt-install): > Briefly, fixed size for /root and /boot, and the rest is filled up for > /srv. > > The same kickstart (despite that c7 uses vda, f29 uses sda) doesn't work > with Fedora29 (EL8). I get a "device is too small for new

On 08.05.19 19:16, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: ... > I get a "device is too small for new format" error. Any hints? ...> part pv.0104 --fstype="lvmpv" --ondisk=sda --grow pv.0104 > volgroup ee --pesize=4096 pv.1974 pv.1974 mismatch! -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc

On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> I still use the following kickstart partition scheme for C7 installations >>> (via virt-install): >>> Briefly, fixed size for /root and /boot, and the

Once upon a time, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org> said: > And this only for Fedora29, a C7 installation works fine (dynamically > expands to the boundaries of the disk). You are asking about Fedora - you'd probably get better results on the Fedora mailing lists, forums, etc. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

--On Friday, September 20, 2019 3:49 PM +0200 Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Postfix has a lot of features build-in Sendmail hasn't. It is feature > rich and actively developed. Many things you would need a milter or > complex cf style coding for with Sendmail you can configure in Postfix in > a simple way. How would you implement the section here titled

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

--On Friday, September 20, 2019 2:06 PM -0500 Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: >> How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail >> workaround" using Postfix? > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters.

Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is the default choice? On 9/19/19 6:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Was reading the long list of things being deprecated in the RHEL 8 > release notes t'other day, and saw my old friend sendmail on the list. > > I've stuck by her because I've learned how she likes to be stroked to > get the best out of

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: > Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is > the default choice? I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. I also believe the Postifx is already the default choice, Sendmail isn't in the default installation. > > On 9/19/19 6:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Was

On 21/09/19 1:25 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: >> Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is >> the default choice? > > I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. Correct, but do note that epel has picked up where Red Hat has dropped the ball. Sendmail is available for el8

On 21/09/19 10:15 PM, Peter wrote: > On 21/09/19 1:25 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: >>> Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is >>> the default choice? >> >> I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. > > Correct, but do note that epel has picked up

Le 20/09/2019 ? 14:49, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit : > Please, forget about so call howtos or tutorials on the net. They > are either dated, giving wrong ideas (no, you don't need a MySQL > server to run Postfix), failing to explain why the author has done > things the way he writes them up, or they are simply wrong / > violating best practice. Here are my so-called tutorials

Le 22/09/2019 ? 23:47, Fred Smith a ?crit?: > Thanks Niki! Google even does a pretty good job of translating them for > those of us who are Francophonally challended. > > I find it humorous that it talks about "throwing" an application. :) > I guess the original was something like "launching", only in French. On a related off-topic note, here's a funny

How do you install libreoffice. yum install libreoffice did not do it, doing a search on "centos 8 install libreoffice" did not provide anything. Thanks Jerry

On 28.09.19 00:07, Jerry Geis wrote: > How do you install libreoffice. yum install libreoffice did not do it, > doing a search on "centos 8 install libreoffice" did not provide anything. There is no single package libreoffice in CentOS 8. Instead there are several packages for each libreoffice component like libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-draw and so on. You may like to install

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 02:46:18PM +0200, Markus Falb wrote: > > Alternatively you may like to learn how to use your package manager to > get answers to your questions. > > ...snip > # yum search libreoffice > ... The RHEL 8 Release Notes mention several package managers. Yum3, the older python-based version we have known, yum4, also python but based on the dnf backend, and

the AnyConnect vpn doesn't appear to be available on C8. Looked at rpmfusion and don't see it there either. anyone know when/if it might ever be? or where? thanks in advance! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners,

On 28/09/2019 13:46, Markus Falb wrote: > On 28.09.19 00:39, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> On 28.09.19 00:07, Jerry Geis wrote: >>> How do you install libreoffice. yum install libreoffice did not do it, >>> doing a search on "centos 8 install libreoffice" did not provide anything. >> >> There is no single package libreoffice in CentOS 8. Instead there are