similar to: looking for rpms in CentOS 8

On 12/27/19 11:51 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: > Hi, > I can't find 3 rpms (for now, maybe more later) in centos 8, > which are available for centos 7 and 6. > > perl-Crypt-SSLeay See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744782 Apparently it's been superseded by perl-Net-SSLeay. > perl-Data-Validate-IP I don't even see this in EL7 proper -

On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > >> Hi, >> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >> awaiting >> the same for 6.7. >> >> Thanks!

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:03:24 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I downloaded a Centos 8 image file : > > CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > > then I installed it as a kvm guest on a Centos 7 host machine. > > I installed a lot of the software; gui and server to give it a test drive. > > Nothing unusual about what I did that I can identify. And the message came up when

Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. Thanks! -->Pat

According to the RHEL docs, package log4j was replaced with package log4j12 in RHEL 8.0. However, when I attempt to install the package in CentOS 8, dnf cannot find it. I have the Base, AppStream, Extras and PowerTools repos enabled. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

Hello, some days ago I followed these instructions https://sigs.centos.org/virt/tdx/host/ and after enabling the repo I installed the tdx necessary bits as indicated, with the command dnf install kernel-tdx qemu-kvm-tdx libvirt-tdx This gave me: libvirt 9.5.0-1.el9s qemu-kvm 8.0.0-15.el9s kernel 5.14.0-395.el9s But now if I run a usual "dnf update" I'm proposed

I have installed 1.12.8-10.el8_2, but when trying to install dbus-devel it is not available for that version, only 1.12.8-9.el8, which is also not available. Suggestions? # yum list | grep dbus dbus.x86_64 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2 @BaseOS dbus-common.noarch 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2

Dear CentOS members, Does someone know how to resolve this package conflict, it is creating security issues with freeipa dependencies. [root at freeipa01 ~]# yum update --refresh CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream 102 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 CentOS Stream 8 - BaseOS 18

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 23:29, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > All, > While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some > package with unresolved dependencies. > I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none > of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is > trying

Hi, Is there an ETA on when CVE-2014-4043 for glibc will be fixed in centos. I see the upstream vendor version glibc-2.20 has this fix supposedly, but I don't see this specific fix in the centos glibc changelogs. I've compiled the test code for this bug and as of glibc-2.17.77 the test reports the bug is present. Preferably we'd like this fix on centos6.6 as we can't

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02

Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10

On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: > On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >> >>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>> a resource? >>> >> CentOS doesn't publish security errata. If you need it then you should

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > ripping > the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical packages? I've attached a capture of "dnf erase *mate*" that shows the 104 packages

On 8/5/20 10:45 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: > On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: >>> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be

On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. > > I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and > CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I > just have the Appstream repos enabled. > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating

On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > > > >> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy

On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just

Hi All, I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I just have the Appstream repos enabled. The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating the installation. The problem seems to be some installed rpms seem to depend on updates from

On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: >> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >>> >>>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>>> a resource? >>>> >>> CentOS