similar to: Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers

sorry guys to spam a bit - I hope someone from redhat could check whether - freeipa-users at redhat.com - is up & ok? I've been a subscriber for a couple of years but now, suddenly(?) I cannot mail there, I get: " Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: 554: 5.7.1 <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: Recipient

Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting security updates anymore, because they are conflicting. I will go to FOSDEM in Belgium this year to figure out more, but I am considering moving my centos systems to rockylinux. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong On 12/16/22 16:59,

hi guys I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I might ask. many thanks, L.

On 13/08/2019 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:02:58PM +0100, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > >> I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? >> >> I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I >> might ask. > RHEL 7.7 has FreeIPA 4.6.5, and eventually CentOS will get that > version, but it's

On 25/10/2019 14:46, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi, anybody knows why? > > many thanks, L. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or rather why not in default steam but in a separate dnf module?

Hi, I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf on Fedora desktops. My question is: Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> hi guys >> >> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only >> contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production >> envs. >> >> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to >> be a viable option to put it on

I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but

On 30/08/2019 17:25, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 30/08/2019 17:12, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi guys, >> >> with Samba as below >> >> [global] >> ???? workgroup = NNNR >> ???? netbios name = PA2 >> ???? realm = PRIVATE.REALM.MINE >> ???? kerberos method = dedicated keytab >> ???? dedicated keytab file =

[extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.] > From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk > Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016 >> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400 >> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>> ps. I

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02

does anybody see this: unning transaction Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. ** Found 8 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts freeipa-admintools: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch ipa-client-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.x86_64 has installed conflicts freeipa-client:

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

On 04/11/16 12:51, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: > Do you get this error when using 'yum'? 'dnf' is provided via EPEL > and isn't part of CentOS, so you might want to consider filing a bug > with EPEL. it seems it might be

hi everyone, I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: $ dnf repolist Failed to open: /var/cache/dnf/x86_64/7/x86_64/7/epel/repodata/8415cbb16f52517f34e3edac12a97c9893117f7b9de6cb22fc086048febd1c60-updateinfo.xml.bz2. that file is there, so I tampered with perms & fcontext but to no avail. dnf clean does remove it but on the first contact to epel repo it fails again. Do you see it

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:44:06PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: > does anybody see this: > > unning transaction > Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. > ** Found 8 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output > follows: > ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts > freeipa-admintools: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch >

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:11:04PM -0600, David G. Miller wrote: > "ip" should be used instead.? Likewise for using dnf instead of yum, > systemctl instead of service, firewallcmd instead of iptables, etc. > I wonder how many shell scripts there are "out there" that folks > have written or accumulated over the years and which now need to be > updated before

All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for

I am building a new workstation based on EL8 now. As someone else here mentioned, the raw EL8 distribution is unusable as a workstation. Therefore I am building lot of additional packages. Today I came across a problem with a custom package with an Epoch version, that kills the yum/dnf update process (it tries to find a "best" package etc.). My actually question; is the RPM Epoch

Hi, I wonder if someone here is already authing against FreeIpa with some latest Ubuntu/SSSD install. I'm on on Ubuntu 15.10 for samba to test this out: Samba: 4.1.17 SSSD: 2.1.17 Freeipa: 4 on CentOS 7 I don't need an AD so I'm folling this what still does not apply. http://www.freeipa.org/page/Howto/Integrating_a_Samba_File_Server_With_IPA I hope someone can help out and