similar to: samba with gluster almost non-usable

Hello All, I am trying to setup a three way replicated Gluster Storage which is exported by NFS Ganesha. This 3 node Ganesha cluster is managed by pacemaker and corosync. I want to use this cluster as a backend for several different web-based applications as well as storage for mailboxes. The cluster is working well but after triggering the failover by stopping the ganesha service on one node,

I found the following memory leak present in 3.13, 4.0 and master: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550078 I will clone/port to 4.0 as soon as the patch is merged. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Javier Romero <xavinux at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Have tested on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) with Kernel > 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 > > This

Hi all, Have tested on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) with Kernel 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 This package works ok http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install glusterfs-server # systemctl

On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: > > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, > to a regular fs and removing acl works as

I am getting startup errors for nfs ganesha CentOS 7.3 with gluster 3.10.2 from CentOS storage sig # systemctl status nfs-ganesha ? nfs-ganesha.service - NFS-Ganesha file server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-ganesha.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: core-dump) since Wed 2017-06-14 14:00:49 EDT; 4s ago Docs:

Hi, I am using glusterfs 3.10.3 on my CentOS 7.3 Kernel 3.10.0-514. I have 2 machines as server nodes on my volume and 1 client machine CentOS 7.2 with the same kernel. >From Client: [root at CentOS7286-64 ~]# rpm -qa *gluster* glusterfs-api-3.7.9-12.el7.centos.x86_64 glusterfs-libs-3.7.9-12.el7.centos.x86_64 glusterfs-fuse-3.7.9-12.el7.centos.x86_64

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a regular fs and > removing acl works as expected. > Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to modify/remove ACLs for > users, groups and masks but that one

After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet). You need to use 3.10 for now. On 07/06/2017 12:53 PM, Anthony Valentine wrote: > I'm running this on CentOS 7.3 > > [root at glustertest1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > > Here are the software versions I have installed. > > [root at

Fwd.ing to Gluster users, in the hope that many more people can see this and hopefully can provide any clues thanx, deepak -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Gluster-devel] Seeing non-priv port + auth issue in the gluster brick log Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 12:43:20 +0530 From: Deepak C Shetty <deepakcs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: IBM India Pvt. Ltd. To: Gluster

Forwarding to the devel and users groups as well. We have tagged 4.0.0 branch as GA, and are in the process of building packages. It would a good time to run final install/upgrade tests if you get a chance on these packages (I am running off to do the same now). Thanks, Shyam -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.0.0 released

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>: > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

hi guys I have a simple case of: $ setfacl -b not working! I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a regular fs and removing acl works as expected. Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to modify/remove ACLs for users, groups and masks but that one simple, important thing does not work. It is also not the case of default ACLs being enforced from the parent, for I

Trying to revive this old thread as problems continue. I have noticed from the gluster logs the following on m y volume called export: [2017-08-16 20:08:47.663908] I [MSGID: 109066] [dht-rename.c:1608:dht_rename] 0-export-dht: renaming /projects/ACTIVE/Automotive/JEEP/Brand Image Program June 2016/04_Western Region/Huntington Beach CDJR - Huntington Beach, CA/04 REVIT AND CAD/2017-08-16 CAD dwgs

Hello, I've caught a glimpse of the new RHEL 6.5 (well, new packages landed in CentOS) and I notice it now provides quite a nice version of Gluster 3.4.0 with a lot of backports. I've got 2 problems now: - I've got gluster installed from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/CentOS/epel-6/x86_64/, but the package in EL6 Base will not upgrade it nicely

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0/glusterfs-4.0.0-0.1.rc1.el7.x86_64.rpm Thanks Javier. Isn't this what you intended though? yum upgrade

Hello all, We have a distributed volume running in 7 hosts and 28 bricks. We've been experiencing some strange behaviors over the time, some of them are solved when the gluster services are restarted, but other problems persist. In the case below, and this one happens many times, some people access the gluster filesystem via Samba. They have a mapped drive in their windows machine.

Hello, Recently I spent a bit time understanding rebalance since I want to know its performance given that there could be more and more bricks to be added into my glusterfs volume and there will be more and more files and directories in the existing glusterfs volume. During the test I saw something which I'm really confused about. Steps: SW versions: glusterfs 3.4.4 + centos 6.5 Inital

Not so fast, 3.8.4 is the latest if you are using official RHEL rpms from Red Hat Gluster Storage, so support for that should go through your Red Hat subscription. If you are using the community packages, then yes, you want to update to a more current version. Seems like the latest is: 3.8.4-44.el7 Diego On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ben Werthmann <ben at apcera.com> wrote: >

Good point Diego. Thanks! On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Not so fast, 3.8.4 is the latest if you are using official RHEL rpms > from Red Hat Gluster Storage, so support for that should go through > your Red Hat subscription. If you are using the community packages, > then yes, you want to update to a more current version. >

Hello, I first posted this question to the IRC but it was suggested I also post here for better visibility. I am currently having a bit of trouble with Gluster, Samba, and the VFS plug-in between them. I am also posting this to the Gluster mailing list. The behavior I am seeing is that by using the samba-vfs-gluster plug-in the case sensitivity setting for Samba breaks in a subtle but noticeable