similar to: deprecations leading up to C8

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "deprecations leading up to C8"

2019 Sep 20
0
deprecations leading up to C8
When I migrated our mx boxes from CentOS 5 to 7 I made the leap to postfix. I built a test server with postfix etc on it and threw everything I could think of at it before going live. The key is, like in learning a new language, to start thinking in postfix terms instead of thinking in sendmail terms. It takes a while to 'get it' but I'm glad we made the link. We search, read as
2019 Sep 20
0
deprecations leading up to C8
Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is the default choice? On 9/19/19 6:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Was reading the long list of things being deprecated in the RHEL 8 > release notes t'other day, and saw my old friend sendmail on the list. > > I've stuck by her because I've learned how she likes to be stroked to > get the best out of
2019 Sep 21
2
deprecations leading up to C8
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: > Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is > the default choice? I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. I also believe the Postifx is already the default choice, Sendmail isn't in the default installation. > > On 9/19/19 6:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Was
2019 Sep 24
6
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
I feel your pain re Gnome. Installing CentOS 8 on a VMware VM which uses BIOS boot mode using the graphical installer results in an installer gui which is chopped off at the right. Workaround is to select the install option, hit the tab key, and append vga=819 and hit F10, which starts the graphical installer on a larger virtual display. Or, better still, use EFI boot mode for your VM, and it
2019 Sep 27
2
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
What does vga=819 and vga=319 mean? On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 01:54, Jon Pruente <jpruente at riskanalytics.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randal, Phil <phil.randal at hoopleltd.co.uk> > wrote: > > > Workaround is to select the install option, hit the tab key, and append > > vga=819 and hit F10, which starts the graphical installer on a larger
2019 Sep 25
1
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
I had fun with that - enter any number you like, if it's not valid it will prompt you with suggestions. It seems to want decimal on the commandline, hex if responding to the prompt. Phil Phil Randal Infrastructure Engineer Hoople Ltd | Plough Lane | Hereford HR4 0LE Tel: 01432 260415 | Website: www.hoopleltd.co.uk Follow us on: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn -----Original Message-----
2019 Dec 27
3
Disabling TLS 1.1 in Centos 7 cockpit
Hi, I'm using cockpit in standard port 9090 in a Centos 7 system. Due to a suggestion from management, they want TLS 1.1 disabled system-wide in all Linux boxes and TLS 1.2 enabled. I have not found proper documentation on how to disable it for cockpit (version 195.1 ships with Centos 7) So far I have tried (https://cockpit-project.org/guide/149/https.html):
2019 Sep 27
1
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
Heads up, Hyper-V Gen 2, CentOS 8 Server with GUI install results in a black screen as updates are needed for X to properly detect and load the video. If you can ssh into the box, do a yum update and it should grab the needed updates, then reboot. Gregory Young -----Original Message----- From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Sent:
2019 Sep 24
9
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
Good evening from Singapore, Anybody downloaded, installed, and tried CentOS 8.0 1905 yet? Download link from CentOS download mirror near to Singapore: http://mirror.vodien.com/centos/8.0.1905/isos/x86_64/CentOS-8-x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso The DVD ISO filesize is 6.6 GB. I am downloading it right now...Approx. 20 mins more to download completion using 1 Gbps home fiber internet connection.
2019 Sep 20
0
Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)
--On Friday, September 20, 2019 3:49 PM +0200 Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Postfix has a lot of features build-in Sendmail hasn't. It is feature > rich and actively developed. Many things you would need a milter or > complex cf style coding for with Sendmail you can configure in Postfix in > a simple way. How would you implement the section here titled
2019 Sep 20
2
Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>
2019 Sep 20
0
Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)
--On Friday, September 20, 2019 2:06 PM -0500 Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: >> How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail >> workaround" using Postfix? > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters.
2019 Sep 21
0
deprecations leading up to C8
On 21/09/19 1:25 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: >> Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is >> the default choice? > > I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. Correct, but do note that epel has picked up where Red Hat has dropped the ball. Sendmail is available for el8
2019 Sep 21
1
deprecations leading up to C8
On 21/09/19 10:15 PM, Peter wrote: > On 21/09/19 1:25 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: >>> Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is >>> the default choice? >> >> I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. > > Correct, but do note that epel has picked up
2019 Sep 22
0
deprecations leading up to C8
Le 20/09/2019 ? 14:49, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit : > Please, forget about so call howtos or tutorials on the net. They > are either dated, giving wrong ideas (no, you don't need a MySQL > server to run Postfix), failing to explain why the author has done > things the way he writes them up, or they are simply wrong / > violating best practice. Here are my so-called tutorials
2019 Sep 23
0
deprecations leading up to C8
Le 22/09/2019 ? 23:47, Fred Smith a ?crit?: > Thanks Niki! Google even does a pretty good job of translating them for > those of us who are Francophonally challended. > > I find it humorous that it talks about "throwing" an application. :) > I guess the original was something like "launching", only in French. On a related off-topic note, here's a funny
2019 Sep 20
3
Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix IIRC... I haven't tried them (which is a little sad,
2019 Sep 22
3
deprecations leading up to C8
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 20/09/2019 ? 14:49, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit : > > Please, forget about so call howtos or tutorials on the net. They > > are either dated, giving wrong ideas (no, you don't need a MySQL > > server to run Postfix), failing to explain why the author has done > > things the way he writes them up, or
2019 Sep 20
5
deprecations leading up to C8
Am 2019-09-20 12:06, schrieb Randal, Phil: > When I migrated our mx boxes from CentOS 5 to 7 I made the leap to > postfix. > > I built a test server with postfix etc on it and threw everything I > could think of at it before going live. > > The key is, like in learning a new language, to start thinking in > postfix terms instead of thinking in sendmail terms. Exactly, I
2015 Jul 26
2
C6.6 Gnome panel problem
Hi all! I usually keep the panels on my Centos 6.6 (Gnome) so they auto-hide, but t'other day I wanted to keep the top panel visible for a while to make the clock visible for doing some rough timings. so I open the top panel, click properties, and UNcheck the "autohide" checkbox, close the properties menu, and to my surprise, the panel still autohides. Went thru that exercise