similar to: Firefox showing bogus sites after 'yum update'

Hi all, Just finished all of the "annoyance" issues with IE7 and started putting together an IE7 policy template for System Policy Editor. This is just a "beta" release I guess. Get it Here: http://files.pcc-services.com/files/samba/ie7beta1.adm Here is what I included so far: - Always Show Menu bar - Set Menubar to Top Position These two basically make IE7 look more

I have just run a 'yum update' on a Centos 7.2 server which updated several hundred RPMs. The update worked fine with no errors or warnings I then rebooted the server and now my EXIM is rejecting emails because the clamd service isn't running. So I tried: [root at ollie2 ~]# systemctl restart clamd.exim Failed to restart clamd.exim.service: Unit clamd.exim.service failed to load:

Hi Paddy, I was suspecting the same, and from the output below I think you're right. However, I was hoping I could just repair this problem for now, and worry about replacing the HDD later. I need to resume some services that also seem to generate this same error. Gary [root at zeppo services]# ll /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/itertoolsmodule.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 61976 Sep 15

Always Learning wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 12:54 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> James B. Byrne wrote: >> > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote: >> >> >> >> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts. >> > >> > Better fight with bits than blood. >> >> Yes, but... attacks on the friggin'

Did anyone else just get what looks like a phising attempt pretending to be from digium? It appears to be full of links to http://app.en25.com/e/er.aspx I must admit, it looks genuine.

In article <201908300952.37126.gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>, Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 18:10:19 Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 exception: [Errno 14] curl#60 - "Peer's > > > Certificate issuer is not recognized." > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 retrycode (14)

On Aug 28, 2019, at 4:36 PM, Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > Anyone got any suggestions? If it?s really out of date, you might need to update the ca-certificates package, but that?d have to be a really old system. I?d suggest by checking to make sure the clock on your computer isn?t really out of date. If its right, I?d double-check with ?curl? to see if you

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon > Messmer > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 6:56 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld > > On 01/29/2017 01:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I telnet to localhost 143 or 993 and I can connect, telneting to 25 > > or 465, connection refused.

Am 2019-08-29 18:26, schrieb Gary Stainburn: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 16:47:11 Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> rpm -Vv nss > > [root at stan2 ~]# rpm -Vv nss > ......... /etc/pki/nss-legacy > ......... c /etc/pki/nss-legacy/nss-rhel7.config > ......... /etc/pki/nssdb > ......... c /etc/pki/nssdb/cert8.db > ......... c /etc/pki/nssdb/cert9.db > ......... c

On 8/30/19 5:52 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Incidentally, the*good* server that I was referencing my broken server against has decided to start giving the curl certificate errors in the same way that the broken one did. Very strange. I ran It's possible that the error is unrelated to the ca-certificates file.? You'll only see it if yum selects a mirror that uses a Let's Encrypt

[ Sorry, I did not see the renamed thread until I'd already replied on the old one. Calling this a phishing attack is exactly right. ] On 2010-01-30, Joachim Schipper wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you argue that connecting to malicious > hosts is currently secure, and will remain secure, but that it will > become easier to convince people to send the passphrase for

On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote: > On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You > > need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past > > the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this > > situation nor will any other set of

> Am 26.09.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk>: > > On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote: >> On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You >>> need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past >>> the dependency

On Tuesday 26 September 2017 11:56:06 Joseph L. Casale wrote: > The error is actually pretty straight forward. You are using a repo > (atrpms) that has not been updated in years, it's not surprise that it > finally has lost compatibility with the platform. > > Find a modern and up to date replacement for any packages you reference > from atrpms and without the switches. When

Mozilla probably (finally) made the adjustment for 2160 lines of resolution. LOTS of softwares need[ed] to tweak their interfaces to be usable on 4k displays. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2017 10:22:19 John Hodrien wrote: > > The safe bet is, it doesn't, and it's something unique to you/your >

Imagine the following scenario Last Saturday, 3:00 AM a big phishing attack hits our e-mail inboxes. Spamassassin does not mark them as spam, and our 50.000+ users have in their mdbox a very credible phishing attack. What doveadm-fu could I use to delete (or move to spam) that e-mail from each user INBOX (let?s imagine the Subject or a Header is known)? I repeat: already delivered e-mail, how

On Thursday 02 February 2017 10:22:19 John Hodrien wrote: > The safe bet is, it doesn't, and it's something unique to you/your > profile/your firefox configuration. Have you got an example URL that > you're saying obviously misrenders in firefox? > > Does it still misbehave if you run firefox in safe mode with a new profile, > say be doing: firefox --ProfileManager

I've also tried adding the pgsql and mysql RPM's and they're not available either. On 20/03/2023 12:58, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Apologies.? This is the correct screen grab. > > The extra errors in the OP were because I had been experimenting, to > try to fix the issue. > > [root at testsvr ~]# ./ldapAuth.php gary.stainburn fake-password > PHP Fatal error:?

I was wondering if anyone thought of applying filters to email post delivery, pre-read. Basically the idea would be to head off Spam, Malware or Phishing for already delivered email. Malware would probably be the least likely target, as (knock on wood) user workstations would be updated, but a targeted phishing scam would not create a public signature that would be downloaded, yet an

On Thursday 29 October 2015 20:37:03 Ned Slider wrote: > On 29/10/15 10:51, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 October 2015 21:12:19 Ned Slider wrote: > >> On 28/10/15 11:55, Gary Stainburn wrote: > >>> We are receiving LOTS of emails that contain empty XLS or DOC documents > >>> with embedded virus macros. These are getting past SPAMASSASSIN, >