On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote:> On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You > > need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past > > the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this > > situation nor will any other set of yum options. > > Christ, how long as ATRPMs been dead?? I think I stopped using it in > 2008/9.I don't know. I will have installed then when following instrunctions found online. I generally check the dates on any web page I use, maybe I missed one. Anyway, enabling it again for this box fixed the problem.
> Am 26.09.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk>: > > On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote: >> On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You >>> need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past >>> the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this >>> situation nor will any other set of yum options. >> >> Christ, how long as ATRPMs been dead? I think I stopped using it in >> 2008/9. > > I don't know. I will have installed then when following instrunctions found > online. I generally check the dates on any web page I use, maybe I missed > one. > > Anyway, enabling it again for this box fixed the problem.Sorry to be pedantic, the symptom is fixed not the problem. To check which packages are from atrpms try this one: # rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME}-%{VENDOR}\n' | grep -v CentOS It will list package name along with the corresponding repo tag. That list can then be used to plan a package migration. -- LF
On Tuesday 26 September 2017 15:32:50 Leon Fauster wrote:> Sorry to be pedantic, the symptom is fixed not the problem. > > To check which packages are from atrpms try this one: > > # rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME}-%{VENDOR}\n' | grep -v CentOS > > It will list package name along with the corresponding repo tag. > > That list can then be used to plan a package migration.Leon, There's nothing wrong with being pedantic, and thanks for the command. It was very useful. However, for the box that has the problem, it's not worth the time and effort involved in doing the correct fix. Gary