similar to: centos 7.5 crashed, kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3668!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "centos 7.5 crashed, kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3668!"

2004 Jul 01
20
[PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler
This patch updates the network emulation packet scheduler. * name changed from delay to netem since it does more than just delay * Catalin''s merged code to do packet reordering * uses a socket queue''s directly rather than layering on qdisc(fifo) because this is used in performance tests. * adds placeholder in API for future enhancements (rate and duplicate).
2004 Jul 29
1
error: structure has no member named `rate''
I want to take the functionality that I found sitting in linux-2.6.8-rc2/net/sched/sch_netem.c for a test drive but I found that the /sbin/tc that I have does not have the necessary knobs. So I grabbed iproute2-2.6.X-ss040702.tar.gz and tried to build it, but I got this: q_netem.c: In function `netem_parse_opt'': q_netem.c:90: error: structure has no member named `rate''
2004 Nov 24
8
tc and iptables trouble
Hi all I have a trouble configuring the qdiscs, when I indicate the "perturb 10" option to tc, i gives me this error: tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 5:1323 handle 1323 sfq perturb 10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument if I don''t put the "perturb 10" option, it works. another question is about iptables, when I indicate the " --set-mark" option: iptables -t
2023 Mar 20
0
[RFC PATCH v1 3/3] test/vsock: skbuff merging test
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 09:53:54PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >This adds test which checks case when data of newly received skbuff is >appended to the last skbuff in the socket's queue. > >This test is actual only for virtio transport. > >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru> >--- > tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 81
2023 May 19
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) > */ > br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); > > + skb->l2_miss
2007 Mar 28
3
Xen netfront fixes for changed skbuff in net-2.6.22.git
Hi Herbert, I wonder if you''ve got a chance to look at netfront in light of the new stuff in davem''s network tree (the stuff that''s in http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git). In particular, struct sk_buff has been changed so that "nh" has gone, and the replacement can be just an offset rather than a full pointer. This breaks the
2023 May 23
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 11:10 +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:52:18PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > > > +++
2018 Dec 13
0
CEBA-2018:3668 CentOS 7 fence-agents BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:3668 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3668 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 948691e87473b34d48e65e16cb6fc96be4d9894c97b54371ace8944991fcbfb2 fence-agents-aliyun-4.2.1-11.el7_6.1.x86_64.rpm
2003 Aug 06
1
System slow down (PR#3668)
Full_Name: Jeff Benjamin Version: 1.7.1 OS: XP Home Edition Submission from: (NULL) (131.202.163.72) Recently have been using R1.7.1 on a new laptop computer. System and software worked fine for at least two weeks. Now the entire OS slows down to the point where one would think it had frozen. I feel there must be a compatibility issue between R and XP Home (including auto updates / service
2024 Feb 16
10
[Bug 3668] New: OpenSSL version header not found
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3668 Bug ID: 3668 Summary: OpenSSL version header not found Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Build system Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2014 Sep 07
0
[PATCH 1/3] virtio_net: pass well-formed sgs to virtqueue_add_*()
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:40:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 03/09/2014 06:29, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > > + sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2); > > I think 2 is enough here. That said... > > > sg_set_buf(rq->sg, &hdr->hdr, sizeof hdr->hdr); > > - > > skb_to_sgvec(skb, rq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len); > > > >
2014 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 1/3] virtio_net: pass well-formed sgs to virtqueue_add_*()
Il 03/09/2014 06:29, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > + sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2); I think 2 is enough here. That said... > sg_set_buf(rq->sg, &hdr->hdr, sizeof hdr->hdr); > - > skb_to_sgvec(skb, rq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len); > > err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, 2, skb, gfp); ... skb_to_sgvec will already make the sg well
2014 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 1/3] virtio_net: pass well-formed sgs to virtqueue_add_*()
Il 03/09/2014 06:29, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > + sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2); I think 2 is enough here. That said... > sg_set_buf(rq->sg, &hdr->hdr, sizeof hdr->hdr); > - > skb_to_sgvec(skb, rq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len); > > err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, 2, skb, gfp); ... skb_to_sgvec will already make the sg well
2023 May 19
2
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff
2023 May 23
3
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:52:18PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) >
2005 Mar 30
5
netem with prio hangs on duplicate
hi i tried the example given on the examples page to duplicate selected traffic like tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 3: netem duplicate 40% tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 3 u32 match ip dst 11.0.2.2 flowid 1:3 when i ping from 11.0.2.2 to this interface my machine hangs. the same thing works for drop or delay. i would
2006 Apr 26
5
how to change classful netem loss probability?
Hi, I am using netem to add loss and then adding another qdisc within netem according to the wiki. Then i want to change the netem drop probability without having to delete the qdisc and recreate it. I try it but I get invalid argument: thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 root handle 1:0 netem drop 1% thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 parent 1:1 handle 10: xcp capacity 54Mbit
2006 Apr 04
3
Another question (now about u32)
Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class
2013 Jun 28
0
Re: kernel panic in skb_copy_bits
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 12:17 +0800, Joe Jin wrote: > Find a similar issue http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/265611 > So copied to Xen developer as well. > > On 06/27/13 13:31, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:58 +0800, Joe Jin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> When we do fail over test with iscsi + multipath by reset the switches
2023 Mar 23
0
[RFC PATCH v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:01:40PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >Hello Stefano, > >thanks for review! You're welcome! > >Since both patches are R-b, i can wait for a few days, then send this >as 'net-next'? Yep, maybe even this series could have been directly without RFC ;-) Thanks, Stefano