similar to: More oddities...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "More oddities..."

2016 Mar 17
1
Questions regarding hostdev scsi
Hi! I'm oVirt developer responsible for most of 'hostdev' support. While working on SCSI passthrough (that is hostdev type='scsi'), I've encountered few issues I'm not sure how to solve somewhat effectively and nicely. Just a note - oVirt by default disables 'dynamic_ownership', meaning we have to handle endpoint ownership/labeling ourselves. This is not
2014 Sep 11
0
trying but failing - pass-through scsi/sata
hi everybody I'd imagine this topic must have been covered, yet I've failed to find any really helpful and a solid howto/examples of how to pass-through a sata disks. currently I'm having this in my xml: <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='scsi' managed='no'> <source> <adapter name='scsi_host4'/>
2018 May 01
1
More oddities...
My manager's workstation is C 7.4, and it started screaming yesterday about issues with ata5. Except that he has one internal and one external drive, and a DVD. Anyone have clues as to what could be causing this, or where to start looking? He's rebooted it, and before that, I tried rescan-scsi-bus.sh, with no joy. mark
2012 May 07
53
kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?)
Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not
2008 Oct 23
0
Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 23
> > Message: 24 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:53:55 -0400 > From: "John" <jses27 at gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT: Setting a CentOS to gateway a private IP > address > To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <86C552A83B964E6499972CEAD4610189 at ethan27> > Content-Type: text/plain;
2011 Apr 01
2
Need help with an issue after upgrading to 4.1.0
Hi all, This is my first post to the list. My first real major issue with xen. I started on 3.4.2 and upgraded to 4.0.1 without issues. Now I just attempted to go to 4.1.0 and I got the following errors in my log. # cat /var/log/xen/xend-debug.log Xend started at Fri Apr 1 13:51:15 2011. cat: /sys/bus/scsi/devices/host0/vendor: No such file or directory cat:
2009 Oct 28
7
Scripting help please....
Need a scripting help to sort out a list and list all the duplicate lines. My data looks somethings like this host6:dev406mum.dd.mum.test.com:22:11:11:no host7:dev258mum.dd.mum.test.com:36:17:19:no host7:dev258mum.dd.mum.test.com:36:17:19:no host17:dev258mum.dd.mum.test.com:31:17:19:no host12:dev258mum.dd.mum.test.com:41:17:19:no host2:dev258mum.dd.mum.test.com:36:17:19:no
2011 Mar 22
2
Bug#619253: xen-utils-4.0: xend service can't start because of xenstored segfault
Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: squeeze I have 3 VM running. I have upgraded debian squeeze to 6.0.1 (new kernel package 2.6.32-31) and restarted my server. VM were still running. After reboot I could not start xend service (from init.d). I got following errors: kern.log: Mar 22 15:07:30 router kernel: [53888.212756] xenstored[7232]: segfault at 7fff056b5ff8 ip
2014 Feb 25
3
PMTU = 1518 over local network at 1500 MTU
Hi all, I have two nodes, connected to a switch, using Tinc 1.1 from git. They connect each other with sptps, and to other nodes in the Internet with old protocol because they have Tinc 1.0. There is no problem with remote nodes, but between my 2 local nodes, they see 1518 PMTU. But local network is 1500 MTU !!! So nodes can ping each other but larger data does not go. test1=sllm1 test2=sllm2
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] single briged network internet access problems
Hi, I've some problems with this network : [ host1 eth0: 10.22.2.4/8 ] [ host2 eth0:10.22.2.5/8 default route host3] \ / SWITCH internet | | |
2015 Dec 22
0
Sending packet from hostX to hostY via hostY
It's not. In fact it's explicitly telling you that it's *not* forwarding. On 22 December 2015 at 15:55, Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a lot of messages like this in my Tinc 1.1-git log : > > Sending packet from host5 (MYSELF port 655) to host4 (192.168.0.4 port > 655) via host4 (192.168.0.4 port 655) (UDP) > > Is it expected ?
2010 Mar 12
1
unable to get domain list of KVM guests from libvirt as non-root user
I have a python script that monitors the guest VMs on a servers running Xen, but the script doesn't work properly on a server I just built with KVM. The script runs as a non-root user (same on all servers) and simply gathers some details on the status and names of the domains running on the host. The Xen and KVM servers are running CentOS 5.4 x86_64 and are using the same version of
2010 Mar 10
2
unable to get domain status from libvirt & KVM
I have a python script that monitors the VMs on physical host servers running Xen, but the script doesn't work properly on a server I just built with KVM. The script runs as a non-root user and simply gathers some details on the status and names of the domains running on the host. Both Xen and KVM servers are running the same version of libvirt (libvirt-0.6.3-20.1.el5_4) and have the
2010 Mar 11
2
unable to get domain status from libvirt & KVM
I have a python script that monitors the VMs on physical host servers running Xen, but the script doesn't work properly on a server I just built with KVM. The script runs as a non-root user (same on all servers) and simply gathers some details on the status and names of the domains running on the host. Both Xen and KVM servers are running the same version of libvirt
2008 Jun 26
1
gmirror+gjournal: unable to boot after crash
Hi, after one month with gmirror and gjournal running on a 7.0-RELEASE #p2 amd64 (built from latest CVS source), the box hung a couple of times when on high disk load. Finally, while building some port it won't boot for no reason obvious to me. This is what I get with kernel.geom.mirror.debug=2: ata2-master: pio=PIO4 wdma=WDMA2 udma=UDMA133 cable=40 wire ad4: 476940MB <SAMSUNG HD501LJ
2018 Sep 23
0
Strange monitor behavior on forced DVI-D output
Am Freitag, den 07.09.2018, 22:11 +0200 schrieb wolle321 at freenet.de: > Hello , > > I'm new here but I hope I can describe my problem exactly. > > I'm trying to get my DVI-Monitor to work with nouveau. The monitor > is > automatically reported as not connected. LVDS is detected. Forcing it > on Xorg.conf didn't work, KMS does: > >
2006 Mar 10
0
Strange problem with STATUS of Intel MatrixRAID
Hello I have this problem: Yesterday server with FreeBSD 6.0 was self restarted . In messages was this: Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: WARNING - mirror protection lost. RAID1 array in DEGRADED mode Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: writing of Intel MatrixRAID metadata is NOT supported yet Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: subdisk8: detached Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: writing of Intel
2013 Mar 02
1
Please help: Any way to query host membership in nested ldap groups?
Hi all, I have a openldap server setup with netsted netgruops,. Say the netgroups are: ngA: (host1, -, - ), (host2, -, - ) ngB: ngA, (host3, - - ) ngc: ngB, (host4, -, -) Is there a way to find host1's membership? so that I can return: ngA, ngB, ngC? Thanks a lot. --Rob
2006 May 30
1
seg on windows-pr-0.5.1 (was RE: win32-eventlog 0.4.0)
Pe?a wrote: > Hi Dan, > i get a segfault on windows-pr if i run mulitple tails by threading, one thread for each host i''m tailing. > > C:\family\ruby\win-eventlog>dtail.rb > thread/tail-ing Security on host1 > thread/tail-ing Security on host2 > thread/tail-ing Security on host3 > thread/tail-ing Security on host4 > thread/tail-ing Security on host5 >
2009 Jul 26
2
SATA DVD Burner / AHCI / CentOS 4.7 (kernel: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL)
OK, it seems that the kernel I have (stock CentOS 4.7: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL i686) seems to gronk the nVideo SATA controller in AHCI mode. It is NOT able to deal with the SATA DVD Burner I have. It is a "Sony Optiarc DVD Burner with LightScribe Black SATA Model AD-7241S-0B LightScribe Support". Is there some special magic I need to do? Here is the relevant bit from the boot up (SATA ports