similar to: Cloud image_index: is 1801-01 a release?

Hello, There is a new cloud image versioned as 1801-01 available at https://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ However, it is missing from the image-index file. I noticed the Azure version is also absent. Was there a problem with the image build process? Should this image be used? Thanks, Pierre Riteau Chameleon Lead DevOps Engineer https://www.chameleoncloud.org

Subject: Singaporean Mr. Teo En Ming's Refugee Seeking Attempts, In Search of a Substantially Better Life In reverse chronological order: [1] Petition to the Government of Taiwan for Refugee Status, 5th August 2019 Monday Photo #1: At the building of the National Immigration Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taipei, Taiwan, 5th August 2019 Photo #2: Queue ticket no. 515 at the National

Hi everybody. I have an odd issue that I'd like to get some advice on. It is a bit of a long story so please bear with me. X11R6 has a notion of modules so it basically compiles everything into shared libraries and at start-of-day it loads libraries (modules) as needed. A side effect of that is that they require really lazy binding because they do (can?) not enforce the load order. The

Hi, I have created a libvirt network on top of a OVS bridge (named vlan-br) which receives all VLAN tagged packets, i.e. connected to a trunk port. The definition xml is below. What I want to achieve in the portgroup definition 'trunk-native-1221' is to allow 1221 as untagged/native but rest all VLAN as tagged. The following portgroup definition works, but I don't want to enumerate

Hi I have a quad processor Compaq Proliant 5500. The output from dmesg seems strange (I have also sent a copy to freebsd-smp to ask about smp issues) and there are also some performance issues which I suspect are smp related. Could anyone who fels so inclined please take a look at the output and let me have any comments. Thanks _______________________________ Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:09:41 +0000 > From: Chris <christopher.a.hane at gmail.com> > To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] Party extract BinaryTree from cforest? > > I found an internal workaround to this to support printing and plot type > simple, > > tt<-party:::prettytree(cf at ensemble[[1]],

I put this to the smp list and to stable but have had no takers from wither. nThere are both smp and other system issues and I am just wondering if anyoe would be willing to take a look at this output from dmesg and let me have some advice Thanks david ----- Original Message ----- From: "vizion communication" <vizion@ixpres.com> To: <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org> Sent:

I'm trying to bridge a mix of 802.1q tagged and untagged Ethernet frames through the new Ethernet over GRE functionality in kernel 2.6.28 The hosts handling the tunnel (192.168.200.6, 192.168.200.2) are connected together through with a simple cross cable through their eth1 interface. The switches are connected to their respective eth0 interface, which is bridged with their respective gretap

Cologne, 10.12.00 Dear Sir, Dear Madam, We are concerned about the possibility that the European Commission might introduce software patenting into the European Community because we think this will harm our profession. We make our living on data management and statistical analyses. Modern statistics crucially depends on algorithms [cf. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (1999). Modern applied

Hi all dudes. We're organizing a petition to ask Creative to include Ogg Vorbis support in one of their next firmware releases of their digital players. This is very important for two reasons: 1) Creative is a big company. If they include Ogg support in their digital players, other manufacturers will follow the example. 2) This should improve use experience of this class of products for

On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? > Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but

Hi, The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change include : - Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP with the current bridge and vlan code. - Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged vlan can

Using K-9 Mail to IDLE on a test folder "MyIncTmp". When there is a flag change on a message in the folder, which generates an untagged FETCH, K-9 Mail responds with a DONE, but dovecot does not exit IDLE state (LOG 1). However, if a new message is delivered, generating an untagged EXISTS, K-9 Mail responds the same way, with a DONE, and dovecot does exit IDLE state. (LOG 2) You

Greetings, I started this petition the other day. http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/PunkBusterforWINE As legitimate owner of a game, regardless of platform (providing that it will actually run) - one should be entitled to the online experience attached to the game. Sadly, for many Windows(tm) games under WINE this cannot be done because of the PunkBuster Anti-Cheat protection which does not

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

Hi, All. I'm trying to use HP Suresore 24e on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE (Mon May 12 09:32:15 YEKST 2003). The system is installed on Asus P2b-DS motherboard with Adaptec aic7890 onboard scsi-controller. I have 2 SCSI-3 HDDs attached to it: da0: <IBM DDYS-T18350N S96H> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: <IBM DDYS-T09170N S80D> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device and I'trying to

Hi All, Very sorry for posting my question again, because I want to tell you more details on my issue, and it is very important for us! Now I am having trouble in Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN, I have the following network: Internet | Gateway ( One UPNP device) | | <--------- If insert one Ethernet bridge box in here , somethings changes | H u b

Hi All, I posted this question several days before, as if no one reply, any help, hint would be highly appreciated! PLEASE SAVE ME! Now I am having trouble in Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN, I have the following network: Internet | | Gateway | | <--------- If insert one Ethernet bridge box in here ,somethings changes | H u b ( one normal

OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? Boris. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:53 PM, SilverTip257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > Andrew and Dennis are spot on. > Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and > not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < > dennisml at

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> Can you explain? I thought the whole trick with separating out the >> virtqueue notification register was to regain the performance? > > Yes but this trick