similar to: CentOs7 and devtoolset-7 and libgcc_s.so.1 library question

Are you asking if the new libstdc++ is statically linked into your app only for the new functions but your app remains dynamically linked to the old one for the parts of C++ that have remained unchanged, the answer is ?no?. Your app is linked to the new library, period. You can use ldd(1) to prove this to yourself. I am not so sure. That is what I thought, but then I compiled something with a

Has anybody tried (and succeeded) to get gcc 6.3.1 (or devtoolset-6) to work on CentOS 8? In the Animation and Visual Effect industry, gcc 6.3.1 is still the current recommended compiler (see www.vfxplatform.com), and is required to build many plugins. Unfortunately, it is not a "minimum requirement"... It is THE requirement. So I tried to get it from the vault: -- sudo dnf

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

I want to install several gcc with different versions in centos. The default version of gcc in centos6 is 4.9.3. So I use devtoolset install a higher version of gcc. Then I switch to the higher version of gcc by executing "source /opt/rh/devtoolset-5/enable". But now if I want to switch back to the default gcc, how should I do? By the way, is there any solution to install multiple gcc

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:47:29AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian wrote > Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? > > I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. > > BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 You can do it manually as per the instructions at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC Step 1) Download and

Its seems challenging to maintain applications with a long term vision. For EL6 I want to use devtoolset-3-gcc-c++-4.9.2-6.2.el6.x86_64 to compile some binaries. Here my question: will the binaries execute flawless on a plain EL6 system without additional libraries (stdc++ etc.)? Example: scl enable devtoolset-3 'rpmbuild -ba local-app1.spec' -- Thanks, LF

Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: devtoolset-3-dyninst for package:

I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found'. Is there a way to make a backward-compatible binary? If not, is there a sane way to build something that needs gcc 4.8+/boost 1.5.3+/cmake 2.8 on Centos6? I found the devtoolset-2 software collection with a usable gcc, but no

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >> >> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more >> packages? >> regards, > devtoolset-6 is available. > somewhere (semi)officially? where? >

On May 19, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Jaros?aw Bober <jaroslaw.bober at gmail.com> wrote: > > Do I have to install devtoolset on all my machines that I want to run this > app? Probably, yes. That, or redistribute parts of it with your app, either by cherrypicking files from the devtoolset RPM or statically linking to it. > Or would it use built-in libstdc++ library, linking

On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: > devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS > elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 > > isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? > regards, devtoolset-6 is available.

On 25/09/2019 10:30, Ralf Aum?ller wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot > to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the > nvidia-module. > > Error-message from dkms: > > Compiler version check failed: > > The major and minor number of the compiler used to > compile the kernel:

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset in version 7 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-7 $ scl

hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L.

Hi, Is there a repository for binaries of the the RHEL devtoolset-2 [1] packages for CentOS 6 ? [1] http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/RHDevToolset/SRPMS/

Hi, is there any way to get access to devtoolset-4 ? I see alot of stuff at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2076 . Is this not yet released? thanks, Kay

On 12/27/19 11:43 PM, sthustfo wrote: > I am looking to make use of gcc 8/9 on CentOS 7, which is currently with > gcc 4.8.5. How do I go about doing this? SCL repository provides the same > as part of devtoolset8, but devtoolset8 libstdc++-devel i686 package is > missing, without which I can not build 32 bit applications. > > Are there any repository sources from where I can

Hi! Did anyone tried to use devtoolset from different directory than the default one? from what i can see it would be enough just to change the hardcoded directory in enable file but i would like to hear if someone else tried this ... Thank you! Adrian

On 1/3/20 9:37 AM, sthustfo wrote: >> >> You will need to use the devtoolset builds to do this: >> >> >> There is a gcc 8 .. but not gcc 9 >> >> https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-8/ >> >> I did install gcc 8 from devtoolset-8 (SCL repo). However I am unable to > compile 32-bit programs because