similar to: skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: > Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies > there... :) Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!? I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about it, I still don't understand how it could overcome the dependency problem with the skypeforlinux

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of ken > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update > > On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: > > Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with > dependencies >

Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies there... :) On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:02 PM, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: > For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux: > > Packages skipped because of dependency problems: > skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable > > Processing Dependency:

Quoting ken <gebser at mousecar.com>: > For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux: > > Packages skipped because of dependency problems: > ??? skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable > > Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for > package: skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 > > Is there any resolution to

On 23/11/17 19:49, Sorin Srbu wrote: > The Skype flatpak at home worked beautifully, that is to say for about ten > minutes, then the sound (using a Koss SB/45 headset) it started crackling to > the point of not being usable anymore. I hung up and reconnected, then sound > was fine, for another ten minutes at which point the crackling returned. > Checking the sound prefs, I saw

On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: > Hello, > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > >> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >>> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ >> >> Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the

Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:22:19 -0600 Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On 20/11/17 11:30,

On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: > There's the unstable version that installs and works: > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? Peter

On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote: >>>> Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single >>>> binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't >>>> use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer >>>> libstdc++). >>>> >>>> >>>> Please explain

Quoting Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org>: > On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer > GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? > Judging by the comments in the

Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: > > There's the unstable version that installs and works: > > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer > GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to

On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >> >>> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >>>> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >>>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:12:58PM +0100, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 05/03/18 19:53, Fred Smith wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I've finally been reduced to having to install Skype on my Linux box. > > I resisted for years, but now ended up trying it. > > > > and while the latest RPM installs just fine, it refuses to acknowledge > > that I have a

Hi all! I've finally been reduced to having to install Skype on my Linux box. I resisted for years, but now ended up trying it. and while the latest RPM installs just fine, it refuses to acknowledge that I have a microphone! In fact I have two: 1 in the USB web cam (it finds the cam), the second in a Plantronics USB headset, which works fine but not with skype. it is as if it doesn't

Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7? I've used it for a while now, and it's generally worked reasonably well. However, after upgrading to the latest version from the Microsoft repos, it doesn't start up properly. Processes start and remain active until I give up and kill them, but I can't see a window or a tray icon or anything. Has anyone else seen this? Is there

On 03/08/2016 06:49 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-03-07, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from C7.2, >> gnome-applets being one of them. Or has it been moved or renamed or >> otherwise obscured? >> >> tia > > Since gnome-panel and 'flashback' mode have been removed from

This error: Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: debug. Please verify its path and try again occurs every time I run yum (and is where execution stops). Why? and/or What can be done to fix yum so I can use it again? tnx. -- War is a failure of the imagination. --William Blake

One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is DVD vs Blu-Ray. I've never used Blue-ray before, so is there some compelling reason, as a Linux guy, to want to get Blu-ray?

When I do "yum update gmime gmime-sharp" I get: ... --> Missing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos is needed by package gmime-sharp-2.2.10-5.el5.centos.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos is needed by package gmime-sharp-2.2.10-5.el5.centos.i386 (installed) ... But both of these are already installed: # rpm -q gmime gmime-sharp

W dniu 20.08.2015 o 13:26, Mauricio Tavares pisze: > On Aug 20, 2015 6:54 AM, "ken" <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> >> One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is DVD vs > Blu-Ray. I've never used Blue-ray before, so is there some compelling > reason, as a Linux guy, to want to get Blu-ray? > First of all, is this going