similar to: Upstream details at...

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 18:45 -0000, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote: > > > >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html I apparently wasn't clear about the issue. The problem is the

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 at 03:16 -0000, Alexandru Chiscan wrote: > On 06/25/2015 11:51 PM, Stuart Barkley wrote: > > Then from your desktop (assuming Linux already running X) in a > > local xterm do something like: > > > > ssh -Y remote-system > > Do not use that because any user logged on the server can connect to > your X server display and snoop what you

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote: > >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html The following page refers to the same RHBA: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1609 which will not go away for some time ... Akemi

I've got a headless server running CentOS 7. I've got a user who wants to run some graphical software on it, and view using x forwarding. What I don't have clear is how to set this up. I've just installed xorg-x11-server-[Xorg, common]. I assume I need to run X, but I don't see running this in runlevel 5. Thoughts? mark "and why is it called xorg-x11-server, when in

On 2015-06-26, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote: [...] > The documentation of the practical differences between -X and -Y is > pretty obscure (mostly defering to the X Security extension > documentation). I would like to see better clarification of the > differences. One practical difference I have seen is the improved performance of -Y over -X. I have long

I'm watching a couple of mirrors catch up with the 7.1 release and am noticing some churn on the .iso images. It appears that new -01.iso versions are coming downstream while some of the mirrors apparently were getting different .iso images. The -01.iso versions look to be significantly larger than the previous non-01.iso versions (the -Minimal .iso appears to have gone from 560M to 630M for

I haven't seen anything on the announce list and don't see these in the repos: qspice-client - http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0492.html spice-xpi - http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0493.html kvm - http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0479.html Anyone know what the story is? David Martin

Hi all, I was just wondering when this update will trickle down into the Centos repo: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0611.html Obviously, it just came out yesterday, so I'm not expecting it to suddenly appear. ;) Just curious what the turn around time usually is for RHEL bug fixes that get released and when we should expect it. As a side note, does anyone know if there is a way

CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16

I'm unable to find this http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0180.html package update in Centos 5.2 updates. Why? --- Veiko

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Has this RH errata made it into Centos5 yet? http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html If so, what does it take to fix the problem of tomcat not running under Sun Java? Do you have to remove all packages that contain jars and reinstall them? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Hello, I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is : [ivan at algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1 while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update:

Hey, We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write side, Red Hat BZ#771868. I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS releases. If you are better at reading release notes than me, could you please help me out and let me

I just downloaded the bind-chroot rpm and looked into it with Archive manager (so I am lazy), and no files, just the chroot tree. I am assuming there is some script that Archive manager does not show, or I am just missing it, because the ROOTDIR= did get added to /etc/sysconfig/named (and the one in the bind rpm is without this line). Just interesting that if you chroot, you are expected to

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ed2b4fdcfa52c68f623dbb45bd44e870cdd61c72af4970951f2e59401ea353b7 nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ed2b4fdcfa52c68f623dbb45bd44e870cdd61c72af4970951f2e59401ea353b7 nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm

On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:34, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Well, my habit for regular e-mail exchange is "top posting" thus the > person reads my message thus is right to the point why this particular > message message was sent in a first place... But when mail lists are > concerned, I do an opposite, that is I follow mail lists conventions. > I never thought about rationale

Dear Centos-3 Maintainers, there are several new (september) packages from redhat for RHEL3 especially https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-430.html (samba 3.0.6). Perhaps these new packages are not security updates, but .... I am having problems printing in current samba-3.0.4-6.3E which I believe shall be resolved with the new samba. Do you guys intend to rebuild last redhat updates, or

Hello, i want to encrypt my HDD's with GELI (not the root-fs, though). I want to do the encryption without password, just with a key. The key should be stored in a floppy disk, and the read should be read automatically on boot, from the floppy. There is a problem here, because GELI initializes _before_ mounting the disks from /etc/fstab (for obvious reasons, of course). So GELI is not able