similar to: CentOS 6.9 Skylake soft error

Hello Andy, The CentOS 6.9 kernel we are using is 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd Leeds United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 259 1204 Mob: +44 786 065 2778 -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Benzler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:54 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.9 Skylake soft error Hello Mark, which kernel you use? Sometimes it is

You need at least a newer kernel. If you like you can try out http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php <http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php> With 3.10 I?m personal unsure kernel-lt-3.10.104-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm <http://elrepo.reloumirrors.net/kernel/el6/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-lt-3.10.104-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm> But got here centos with 4.11.3 running quiet well.

Hello Mark, which kernel you use? Sometimes it is only an ?information?. Sincerely Andy > Am 31.05.2017 um 10:00 schrieb Mark (Netbook) <mrw at mwcltd.co.uk>: > > Hello, > > I have an Intel NUC6i5 (Skylake i5-6260u processor) running CentOS 6.9 and there are no real problems. However during boot an error occurs in dmesg where a PCH unknown device 0x9d48 is logged. How

Hello, Where do I find kernel-ml? Regards, Mark Woolfson -----Original Message----- From: Nux! Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics Give kernel-ml a try, else try CentOS 7. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark (Netbook)"

Hello, Can you please help. Which versions of Centos 6 and 7 support Multi Stream Transport (MST) on DisplayPort graphics. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd Leeds LS18 4LY West Yorkshire United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 259 1204 Mob: +44 786 065 2778 Em: julie at mwcltd.co.uk (Commercial) Em: mrw at mwcltd.co.uk (Technical) Web: www.mwcltd.co.uk

Hello, I have an Intel NUC7i3 with 620 graphics and an Intel NUC7i7 with 640 graphics. I have loaded CentOS 6.9 and the graphics is not fully working. I believe that I need a driver. Does CentOS support the Intel 620 and 640 graphics and if not, can someone please point me in the direction of the drivers, with install instructions. Regards, Mark Woolfson

Hi John, why not try something newer than CentOS 6.8 ? Maybe not the latest 8.1 but 7.7 is quite recent and stable. Your (integrated) video card is : Intel? HD Graphics 605 (NUC7PJYH) Intel NUC7PJYH seems to be able to pilot Dual 4K display : " ...The NUC7PJYH kit also comes with dual Ultra HD 4K display support via two full-sized HDMI* ports, consumer infrared, and a TOSLINK audio jack,

Hello, I have an Intel NUC7PJYH running CentOS 6.8. This is a NUC with standard USB, 1GbE and 2*HDMI. Installation was no problem providing acpi=off. The problem is that by default the two displays are mirrored and I can?t seem to separate them. I can only see one HDMI port from CentOS. I need to see both HDMI ports discreetly. Can you please help. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd

Hello, I have a pre-production Intel Skylake server using dual 8176 processors (28 core @2.1Ghz) I have loaded from the DVD distribution CentOS 7.3 and RHEL 7.4 with no problems. When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda graphics is started for CentOS configuration. If I use a secondary graphics card then the process completes with no problems and CentOS boots

Hello, Please can anyone help with the problem below when trying to install CentOS 7.6 on an IBM x3500 M3 from DVD or USB. CentOS 7.5 installs perfectly with no errors. CentOS 7.6 tries to boot, an error is output briefly and the workstation powers down. CentOS 7.7 displays the error briefly then continues the install with no further errors. I also tried RHEL 7.6 which installs perfectly with

On 2/7/2017 20:02, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > ... > > My understanding is that BNDCU is the cheapest possible instruction, > just like XOR or ADD, > so the overhead should be relatively small. > Still my guesstimate would be >= 5% since stores are very numerous. > And such overhead will be on top of whatever overhead SafeStack has. > Do you have any measurements to

Hi -- I have found a bug in an HPC code where llvm is vectorizing a loop on Skylake that has an obvious recurrence. I derived a small test case based on the original benchmark below: /*****************************************************************/ static void __attribute__ ((always_inline)) one( const int *restrict in, const int *const end, const unsigned shift, int *const restrict index,

CentOS 6.9 has support for the Haswell processor which is a subset of the Skylake. All Skylake server ancillary components work perfectly with CentOS 6.9. The AST2500 used with the Skylake is very good and will process UHD. However this is not backwards compatible with legacy variants. To make it work an ancillary graphics card is required which is less than $100. This will not break the

Hi, I have a JIT compiler using the legacy JIT on LLVM 3.5 that, when run on the Xeon v5 Skylakes produces "Cannot select: intrinsic %llvm.x86.sse41.round.sd". Note, this does not occur on i7 Kabylakes. To get this far I had to disable AVX512 code gen. Upgrading the system I am looking at from 3.5 to a later version is a big job that I'd prefer not to have on my critical path.

Thank you. I'm letting it auto detect by setting the target using getProcessTarget. I disabled avx512 support by passing -avx512f (and the other variants) to setMAttrs on EngineBuilder. I can see refs to avx512 in X86.td. It's the exact same executable running on Kabylake. What does the Cannot select: specifically mean? Is there some table that doesn't have a definition for a key in

getProcessTriple just determines operation system, and architecture. It doesn't deal with specific instruction set features. The CPU should be controlled by MCPU on the EngineBuilder i think. The CPU autodetection code lives in getHostCPUName in lib/Support/Host.cpp, but I don't think the JIT calls into. I think its expected the user would call it or pass a specific CPU string to the MCPU

I have this code, which works fine on MacOS and Linux hosts: const char *target_specific_cpu_args; const char *target_specific_features; if (g->is_native_target) { target_specific_cpu_args = ZigLLVMGetHostCPUName(); target_specific_features = ZigLLVMGetNativeFeatures(); } else { target_specific_cpu_args = ""; target_specific_features =

Look like sound card layer lspci ??? This is the german web site http://www.intel.de/content/www/de/de/support/boards-and-kits/000005499 .html linux kernel 3.14.8 or higher .. for soundcard and newer alsa .... Sincerely Andy

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Andreas Benzler <andreas at benzlerweb.de> wrote: > You need at least a newer kernel. > > If you like you can try out > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php <http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki- > index.php> > > > With 3.10 I?m personal unsure > kernel-lt-3.10.104-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm <http://elrepo.reloumirrors. >

I suspect that there are 2 issues here: * I have incorrect alignment somewhere * MSVC / .pdb / CodeView debugging is not working correctly. I think the latter would help solve the former. I will send out a new email later talking about the issues I'm having debugging llvm-generated binaries with MSVC. On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: