similar to: rpcbind fails to start after creating virbr0 bridge

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me

Hi, I'm just migrating some stuff from Slackware Linux to CentOS, and I have a question about the orthodox way of configuring a network connection. On a desktop or workstation, I usually get rid of NetworkManager: # systemctl stop NetworkManager # yum remove NetworkManager Then I edit the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-XXXXX file corresponding to my network interface. Here's

Hi Niki, On CentOS it's normal for both wireless and wired to be connected at the same time, maybe what you are seeing is just the icon's being confusing or not being replaced with the right thing? This is easy to check, just issue an "ip route". On My system I can see something like this: default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 proto static 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel

On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 ... > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be set on eth0 only. > # brctl show > > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces OK, so you don't have a bridge interface. If you want to

Hi, My local server is running CentOS 7. The machine has two NICs and is acting as a gateway. For DHCP and DNS, I'm using Dnsmasq. I have a strange little problem with local hostname resolution. Before going into more details, here's my configuration. [root at nestor:~] # ifconfig enp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Hello All, I'm installing some DIY routers, composed of Intel nuc's ,Linksys usb-ethernet adapters and Centos7 On most machines I just plug in the usb device, install Centos7 and everything works. But on this one machine the network interface doesn't work. After installing ip addr shows: [root at clgmol ~]# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue

On 05/12/2016 12:23 PM, lejeczek wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: >> On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: >>> hi users >>> >>> I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is Centos 7.2 >>> Dhcpd would not start, complaining like this: >>> No subnet declaration for virbr0 (no IPv4 addresses).

I've been trying to build a model cluster using three virtual machines on my home server. Each VM boots off its own dedicated partition (CentOS 7.3). One partition is designated to be the common /home partition for the VMs, (on the real machine it will mount as /cluster). I'm intending to run GFS2 on the shared partition, so I need to configure DLM and corosync. That's where I'm

On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:10 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/12/2016 12:23 PM, lejeczek wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > > > On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > > > hi users > > > > > > > > I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is > > > > Centos 7.2 > > > >

On Thursday 21 of April 2016 2:37:49 PM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/21/2016 01:33 PM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > > It's OpenVPN on chamber. > What port is it using? I don't see the standard port listed in your > firewalld rules in either zone. 1194/udp. I added service openvpn and port 1194/udp (just to be sure) to both zones - no change. [root at chamber openvpn]#

I need some help in understanding libvirt's virtual networking. I have configured bridged networking (shared physical device) on libvirt+KVM system which is working fine. Also, I am using default NAT network on with virbr0 bridge device and virbr0-nic. I would like to get better understanding on virbr0-nic works in this virtual network configuration. I understand that traffic from virbr0

Just want to report an error in samba configuration / setup. I installed Samba 4 GA on a fresh installation of Ubuntu 12.04. The server is a testbed and has the virtualization package installed also. I have two network interfaces exept lo: eth0 and virbr0. In the provisioning step samba correctly finds my eth0 network interface: Looking up IPv4 addresses More than one IPv4 address found.

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 20:16:04 CEST Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > I'm trying to build fedora-27 image for

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > > hi users > > > > > > I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is Centos > > 7.2 > > Dhcpd would not start, complaining like this: > > >   > Is virbr0 created by libvirt as part of one of its "virtual >

Greetings, I'm attempting to get several virtual machines setup on a Fedora19 host system, with the traditional bridge network devices (br0, br1, etc). I've done this many times before with older versions of Fedora (16, 14, etc), and it just works. However, for reasons that I cannot figure out, the bridge doesn't seem to be working in Fedora19. While I can successfully connect to

I''m running Xen and created a virtual os called Domain-1. So now I have two systems, Domain-0(dom0) and Domain-1(dom1), both running fedora 8. I only have 1 ethernet device eth0. However, for some reason, my internet doesn''t work in Domain-1. My output for route -n on Domain-0 is: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot.

Hey, I am getting this error after using virt-v2v-copy-to-local and trying to run: $ virt-v2v -i libvirtxml rhel7.xml -o local -os /var/tmp -of raw I try to set: export LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND_SETTINGS=virbr0=ovirtmgmt with no success and the file /etc/qemu/bridge.conf contains: allow virbr0 it only worked after creating the bridge, is there other way to import without creating the bridge? Thank