similar to: SCSI drives and Centos 7

Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:17:55 -0400 > On Apr 29, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net> wrote: > > find a way to make the installation disc of Centos 6 identify the SCSI > drives. What model LSI card? Is that card on the RHEL hardware support list? Does LSI/Dell have drivers on their site? Have you tried drivers from LSI/Dell and using the dd(driver disk)

Hi all, Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes. The logs say; cannot find hfs+ superblock and volumes larger then 2TB are not supported yet Is my case really because of the >2TB volume? Thanks in advance, - aurf

On 04/29/2017 06:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > about 4 years ago, I tried to install CentOS 6 on a Supermicro server > with SCSI drives using a LSI raid system. Red Hat does discontinue support for some storage driver for very old hardware when they start a new release series. For EL6, that list is here:

I've been hard hit by the lack of CentOS-6 documentation mentioned in another thread. The openLDAP setup has been changed completely between CentOS 5 and 6, and I haven't been able to find any reasonably coherent instructions explaining how to upgrade. If anyone knows of such a document I should be most grateful to learn of it. Actually I have openLDAP working (though unencrypted) with my

Everyone, Have any of you installed ubiguiti wireless routers on your network? It looks like the setup requires the use of software; they have some packages that are ready made for Ubuntu and Debian, but not RedHat https://www.ubnt.com/download/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-pro Have any of you tried or succeeded in installation this on Centos 7.4? Greg Ennis

Everyone, I am putting together a new mail server for our firm using a SuperMicro with Centos 7.0. When performed the install of the os, I put 16 gigs of memory in the wrong slots on the mother board which caused the SuperMicro to recognize 8 gigs instead of 16 gigs. When I installed Centos 7.0, this error made the swap file 8070 megs instead of what I would have expected to be a over 16000

I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b results of ifconfig -a lo Link encap:Local Loopback wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:18:8B:80:AE:71 There is no

Thanks for your help. I did pick up an additional entry in the audit file : type=AVC msg=audit(1504561395.709:10196): avc: denied { execute } for pid=19163 comm="/usr/sbin/httpd" name="s.check.cgi" dev="dm-0" ino=537182029 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Unfortunately, I am not sure how the

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Everyone, Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use of tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix? Greg Ennis

Everyone, I am trying to use a cgi perl script for a CentOs 7 website that works fine with selinux in permissive mode but fails with selinux in enforcing mode. The problem I have is that I can not find where the selinux error message is being recorded. It does not appear to be in the /var/log/messages or /var/log/audit/audit.log. I do not get any /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log entries. I do get

Hello. We have a number of Xen 3.4.2. boxes which have constant iowaits at around 10% with spikes up to 100% when accessing data over NFS. We have been unable to nail down the issue. Any advice? System info: release : 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen version : #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:49:53 EDT 2010 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 16 nr_nodes

Everyone, Is there a way to have Centos boot when no keyboard is present. I have a firewall and another mail server that would fit into a closet a little better without a keyboard. I tried to remove the keyboard but the system hangs giving me notice that a keyboard was not found. Greg Ennis

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove

Everyone, I am putting together a new CentOS 7 mail server for our organization and am having some difficulty getting clamav to work with the clamav- milter for sendmail. I have set /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf to use clamscan as the user as well as root as the user and the status command of systemctl results in the same error messages : ? clamd at scan.service - Generic clamav scanner daemon

Everyone, I have just upgraded a Centos 5 server to a Centos 7 server and am having difficulty with a change of behavior of mailx with the use of a command line of : mail -s 'This is the subject' user at domain.com < text_file.txt On Centos 5 when mailx was used by a program started by a cron job we were able to send a text file as an email message and the headers did not contain

Everyone, Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. Greg Ennis

Stephen and Kenneth, Thank you very much for your help. I tried 'MAILRC=/dev/nul' which I put in /etc/mail.rc as 'set MAILRC=/dev/null' But I did not identify that this changed any behavior. The link below was very helpful Stephen thank you for your kindness in digging this out for me.

Looks like RedHat released 5.0 on schedule. Does anyone have an idea when CentOS 5.0 will be ready? I would also like to thank the CentOs team for what they are doing...... Thank you!!!!!!! Greg Ennis

To All, Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work. I have one question. I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two x86_64 machines in order to get perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-27.el5 to update. Does this represent a change from 5.3 to 5.4 and should I be concerned about the loss of perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386. So far I have not found anything broken. Greg Ennis