To All, Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work. I have one question. I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two x86_64 machines in order to get perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-27.el5 to update. Does this represent a change from 5.3 to 5.4 and should I be concerned about the loss of perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386. So far I have not found anything broken. Greg Ennis
Why need perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on x86_64 box ? On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 16:02, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at pomec.net> wrote:> To All, > > Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work. > > I have one question. ?I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two > x86_64 machines in order to get perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-27.el5 to update. > > Does this represent a change from 5.3 to 5.4 and should I be concerned > about the loss of perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386. ?So far I have not found > anything broken. > > Greg Ennis > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- http://vnoss.org
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 10:02 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:> To All, > > Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work.+1> > I have one question. I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two > x86_64 machines in order to get perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-27.el5 to update.I had this on my laptop also, removed the .i386 package and the update completed without complaint.> > Does this represent a change from 5.3 to 5.4 and should I be concerned > about the loss of perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386. So far I have not found > anything broken.I don't remember why the .i386 package was installed here, but have noticed nothing broken since removing it and updating. PME