similar to: Firefox for CentOS

On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, Johnny, > > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to >> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 >> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). >> >>

On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Hi, Johnny, >>> >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >>>> that they have upgraded

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >

I posted Friday about this oddity. Now I've got more data, and what's happening is this: if I tell noscript to enable youtube and googlevideo in one tab, not only does it affect *all* tabs, but also affects another browser window opened from the first browser window. Anyone have any clues for a workaround fix? mark

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed > that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to > the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 > at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). > > EL7: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html > > EL5 and EL6: >

Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 * All the add-ons (language dictionaries, Adblock Plus, Classic Theme Restorer etc.) were disabled with no simple method of reactivating them. Reason given was they were "unsigned". * About:config xpinstall.signatures.required = false partially reduced the problem. * Then possible to reactivate some disabled

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:494-01 Updated ImageMagick packages fix security vulnerabilities This package contains a fix for RedHat bug #62100:ImageMagick does not start from Gnome menu panel. The release number has been updated to indicate that this package has been modified for CentOS-2. Files available:

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:174 Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability RHSA-2004:178 An updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities RHSA-2004:219 Updated tcpdump packages fix various vulnerabilities John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:303-01 Important: sylpheed security update Files available: sylpheed-0.5.0-3.EL21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update --

I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list of updates. We released a new glibc yesterday for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 .. it is VERY important that all users update to these versions: This update is rated as Critical by Red Hat, meaning that

I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the repository. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html Is this something that is coming soon? Thanks!

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:634-01 Updated zip package fixes security issue Files available: zip-2.3-10.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:595 SquirrelMail security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-595.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.3a-10.EL3.centos.1.noarch.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.3a-10.EL3.centos.1.src.rpm You may update your

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:595 SquirrelMail security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-595.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.3a-10.EL3.centos.1.noarch.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.3a-10.EL3.centos.1.src.rpm You may update your

On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Saw this on the Exim List:- >> > <SNIP> >> >> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? >> > > upstream references: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html When I read this I read that it is fixed in

Hi Everyone More updates for Centos3 Available from: http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/3.1/ and soon your local mirror. Security: kernel: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-413.html updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL.athlon.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL.i386.rpm

On 05/13/2015 09:59 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Van: "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> >> Aan: centos at centos.org > Verzonden: Woensdag 13 mei 2015 14:43:22 > Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0988 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update --this breaks language settings > > On 05/13/2015

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS > rebuilt and released it. > > What,

I just saw this: https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01 which includes this: " A remote attacker can send a carefully crafted packet that can overflow a stack buffer and potentially allow malicious code to be executed with the privilege level of the ntpd process. All NTP4 releases before 4.2.8 are vulnerable." "This vulnerability is resolved with NTP-stable4.2.8