similar to: CentOS 7 iso file SHA-256 hashes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "CentOS 7 iso file SHA-256 hashes"

2017 Mar 04
0
CentOS 7 iso file SHA-256 hashes
On 03/03/2017 09:17 PM, Darr247 wrote: > I downloaded CentOS-7-x86_64-Everything.iso (8,233,418,752 bytes) by > clicking on the 'Everything' link in the 'Rolling' line on > https://wiki.centos.org/Download (supposedly the 1611 build). > > But when I look in the sha256sum.txt file from > https://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/ (where Chrome says that
2016 Dec 12
0
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1611) on x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1611) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. Effectively immediately, this is the current release for CentOS Linux 7 and is tagged as 1611, derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 As always, read through the Release Notes at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 -
2016 Dec 13
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 142, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2017 Feb 09
2
Latest CentOS-7 image on cloud.centos.org has incorrect checksum
Good day, I initially posted this issue on CentOS-mirror a week ago but did not receive any response. I'm looking for a resolution to a small issue with the cloud image repository for the latest CentOS-7 image. As far as I understand, the latest release of the CentOS-7 image should always be posted to http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_ 64-GenericCloud.qcow2 The checksum
2006 Mar 28
2
6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso - only usr/share/doc, no usr/src?
Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those two trees would be available somewhere on some disc for RELENG_6_1. I mounted the image as ... mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso -u 0 mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt ...
2015 Jun 30
3
how is the sha fingerprint generated?
% cat ext_rsa.pub| sed -r 's/.*(AAAA[^ ]+).*/\1/' | sha256sum ~/.ssh swlap1 d4bf8b06f2d9d9af7a11583a5367205ed310a84f0dee68d062e2ddca1e85c3ff - % ssh-keygen -lf ext_rsa.pub ~/.ssh swlap1 8192 SHA256:FgrfxmdjTM/j4wwRa7nVdPSUaJdqHYMJtJ6aciPl9ug swilson at swlap1 (RSA) Why do those differ and how would i generate the equivalent (mainly just curious)? I've also tried base64 and a
2013 Apr 07
2
group data in classes
Hello all! I have a problem to group my data (years) in 10 years classes. For example for year year decade 1598 1590-1600 1599 1590-1600 1600 1590-1600 1601 1600-1610 --- my is like this> [1] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 [16] 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 [31] 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633
2019 Nov 15
0
SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS / SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) / SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS), SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) and SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) supports
Dear all, I send you a new email to know what is the progress of SCRAM-SHA-***(-PLUS) supports? Currently there is only SCRAM-SHA-1: https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/password_schemes/. - RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6331 - RFC5802: Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) SASL and GSS-API Mechanisms:
2009 Dec 28
10
samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2
Hallo and Merry Christmas to all! I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2. The repo isn?t available any more, so can anybody help me here? Thanks in advance! Peter
2019 Jan 19
2
SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-512 supports
Hello all, I would like to know if it is possible to add SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-512 supports? RFC7677: SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS: Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 Thanks in advance. Regards, Neustradamus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2019 Jan 20
0
SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-512 supports
Op 20/01/2019 om 00:45 schreef - Neustradamus -: > Hello all, > > I would like to know if it is possible to add SCRAM-SHA-256 and > SCRAM-SHA-512 supports? > > RFC7677: SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS: Simple Authentication > and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 > > Thanks in advance.
2019 Jan 20
1
SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-512 supports
Hello Stephan, Thanks for the link about SCRAM-SHA-256, good news for this point, hope a merge soon :) I am from this page: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes ^^ The -PLUS variant for all SCRAM is not possible too for have (with other SCRAM): SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS), SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS), SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS), SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS), SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) Some softwares use
2006 May 25
2
page.replace_html
This is odd. When I call: page.replace_html ''formdiv'', :partial => ''listing'' from an rjs file it renders stuff like: \n \n \n test \n \n test , NY 12344 \n \n Phone: (999)999-8888 \n\t\t\n\n \n \t\n \t\thttp:// \n \t\n \n \n \n"); } catch (e) { alert(''RJS error:\n\n'' + e.toString());
2011 Jul 28
1
Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record
Hi, I was sure I sent this to openssh at openssh.com, but cannot find that email now in my Sent mailbox, so I am sending it to the developers list. I took a liberty and wrote an I-D with accompanying patch (with contributions from Ondrej Caletka) to support ECDSA in the SSHFP DNS resource record. The I-D is here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa-sha2 (and the source XML
2006 Apr 24
3
Faster Sound Files
I'd like to increase the speed of the Asterisk sound files. Miss Alison talks a bit slow. I can use sox to increase the speed, but then the pitch changes and she starts to sound like a chipmunk. Any audio experts out there know how I can increase the speed a little bit, and change the pitch accordingly so that she sounds ... normal? Thanks Doug.
2018 Dec 16
0
Feature request SCRAM-SHA-256
Hi, is that here the right place to make feature requests? dovecot supports as authentication mechanism SCRAM-SHA-1 from RFC 5802 which was updated to SCRAM-SHA-256 in RFC 7677 Can SCRAM-SHA-256 be added to the authentication mechanisms? I would not like to request, that SCRAM-SHA-1 will be exchanged by SCRAM-SHA-256, since several applications only support SCRAM-SHA-1 Regards Torsten
2018 Dec 16
1
Feature request SCRAM-SHA-256
> On 16 December 2018 at 10:27 Tributh via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > is that here the right place to make feature requests? > > dovecot supports as authentication mechanism > SCRAM-SHA-1 from RFC 5802 > which was updated to > SCRAM-SHA-256 in RFC 7677 > > Can SCRAM-SHA-256 be added to the authentication mechanisms? > >
2018 Dec 16
0
Feature request SCRAM-SHA-256
> On 16 December 2018 at 11:06 Tributh <dovecot-user at tributh.net> wrote: > > > > > Am 16.12.18 um 09:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > > > >> On 16 December 2018 at 10:27 Tributh via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> is that here the right place to make feature requests? > >> >
2019 Jan 19
0
Feature request SCRAM-SHA-256
Hi, Op 13/01/2019 om 17:48 schreef Tributh via dovecot: > Hi, > sorry for my late reply. Was too busy during the week. > Thank you for your patches. I hope I will be able with them to get now > some client support for SCRAM-SHA-256. Will report how I succeed in the > future. I managed to test it successfully using MailKit: https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit I used the IMAP
2004 Dec 07
4
Transfer on Snom 190
I cannot get the transfer button to work on a Snom 190, I cannot get the # to work either. Any ideas? Regards Thorben -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041207/5ac06747/attachment.htm