similar to: RHEL 8 speculation ???

We use GCC 6 from SoftwareCollection 6 and build our own Boost libraries with static linking. The result binaries work on all C7 instances just fine without the need to install any extra packages. The binary size isn't bloated too much by statically linking Boost, because many Boost functions are header templates anyway (but your mileage may vary). Not sure if you have other dependencies but

On 02/25/2017 02:20 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Is there any blog that has information on a potential RHEL 8 release date? > > boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are > solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt > shortly before 7 came out, so I wonder if it is getting near to time. > > I'm working on a major

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL doesn't matter anymore. -=- That spec file

With this post, I run the risk of causing more of the thing that I speak against. I still think it's important to say it. CentOS mailing list is a technical forum. It is not a political forum. Just reading a thread on bitcoins and the entire thread quickly turned into a political thread with people bitching about everything from Chase Bank to the Russians, and that's just crap.

There is a patch to boost that should get into both CentOS and RHEL 7. I already sent an e-mail to the person who last modified the rpm spec file but I have no idea if he will even see the e-mail. The small patch - https://github.com/boostorg/asio/pull/23/files The problem it fixes - boost assumes that the TLS supports SSLv3 which the OpenSSL currently in RHEL / CentOS 7 does. However

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch %endif (and more than just those) resulting in those patches

Did you know you can use systemd to turn on tmpfs for /tmp ??? I had no clue that was possible, always did it through fstab - but systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount That will tell you if systemd has configured /tmp to mount as tmpfs (default in CentOS 7 is no) systemctl enable tmp.mount That, as you can probably guess, tells systemd to mount /tmp as tmpfs next time the system boots. -=- Just

Hello, I've been offered updates for boost* on C6. There has been no announcement at the moment. But neither do I find anything on rhn.redhat.com/errata/ Anyone knows how I should treat this update? Thanks Patrick

On 01/13/2016 05:45 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:39:48AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: >> There is a patch to boost that should get into both CentOS and RHEL 7. >> >> I already sent an e-mail to the person who last modified the rpm spec file >> but I have no idea if he will even see the e-mail. > > Did you submit anything to

Hello to everybody,   I seem to be in struggle with the websockets in R. I wanted to download the streaming data from the BitCoin exchange MtGox directly to R, but R cannot establish the connection. The websocket specs are defined as: * Host: websocket.mtgox.com or socketio.mtgox.com * Port: 80 or 443 ( ssl ) * Namespace: /mtgox (Including beginning slash) url for more

Hello, My server with CentOS 6.8 just failed PCI scan, so I'm looking into vulnerable packages. PHP 5.3.3 have multiple vulnerabilities, some of them are fixed/patched or have some kind of workaround. But I can't find a way to fix this one. Red Hat state: under investigation. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-4073 This CVE is 6 months old, and it doesn't look like it

> Meanwhile banks like Chase charge poor people $12.00 a month just have > checking and push debit card paychecks on low income jobs where they > charge just for the poor to check how much they have on it. That bad, huh?

Hi, there! I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found anything. Anyone can help me? Thanks -- Fran Delgado (ThinWay) Tumblr: http://thinway.tumblr.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/thinway -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 >> >> The source RPM there uses >> >> %if 0%{?rhel} >> # not upstreamed >> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch >> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch

Heads-up to everyone: CR is getting CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') packages..... just updated using CR, and, yeah, GNOME 3.14 is a bit different from 3.8...... several things are in different places on the screen. I did have to re-setup my triple monitor settings to have the laptop's display in the center and the two other displays as one on the left and one on the right. The good

Getting strange loading problem.. >> bundle exec rspec -p spec/models/* give error: .. .rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/ dependencies.rb:240:in `require'': no such file to load -- rspec/rails (LoadError) from /home/slava/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/ lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:in `block in require'' from

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,

> Am 25.01.2021 um 17:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > On 1/22/21 5:12 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 1/22/21 9:29 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: >>>> Hence it is as good as dead in my mind when looking into the future, I >>>> am looking for future distro of choice. >>> >>> A little mentioned choice would

I am getting all these messages when run `passenger-status''. Do I need to worry about this? I am using passenger 2.2.2 with puppet 0.24.8 and apache2 on ubuntu 9.04. I installed it using the wiki http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingPassenger Thread ''Main thread'': in ''int Server::start()'' (ApplicationPoolServerExecutable.cpp:553)