similar to: Kickstart - part ignore onpart ??

I'm ill, i'm german ... the script is looks ok, copy from a slim installation of anaconda. Insert only the "pre part" and part /boot --onpart=/dev/sda1 part / --onpart=/dev/sda2 part swap --onpart=/dev/sda3 As i wrote: Jump over to another console and the partitions are there. Sincerely Andy Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2017, 11:16 -0800 schrieb John R

On 2/15/2017 11:04 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > after hours of uncessfull create example before i forward special > parition tests. > > part ignoe --onpart > > But Installation hang out for parition the harddisk. > > jump to another console partitions are ok ? There are an awful lot of typos in this email message, including the command you're saying you're

Hi, I am struggling with kickstart. What I want to achieve is a reinstall, but some data partitions should survive the install, i.e. they should not be formatted. With a single disk this works, here is the relevant part from the kickstart file (I shortened the name of the volume group) ... zerombr clearpart --none --initlabel part /boot --fstype="xfs" --label=boot --onpart=vda1 part

I have 2 questions dealing with 2 different kickstart files. 1) my kickstart sections for RAID disk setup and kickstart reports it cannot find sda. Why is that. sda is there and works. clearpart --all --initlabel part raid.01 --asprimary --bytes-per-inode=4096 --fstype="raid" --onpart=sda1 --size=20000 part swap --asprimary --bytes-per-inode=4096 --fstype="swap"

I'd like to automate the upgrade from CentOS 4.6 to 5.1 as much as possible. Since upgrades per se are not really recommended, I'm planning to do a kickstart installation. However, I want to leave one of the existing partitions (/scratch) untouched during the installation. Here is my current layout (LogVol00 is swap so not shown in the df output below): # df -hl

Does anyone know how anaconda partitioning enumerates disk partitions when specified in kickstart? I quickly browsed through the anaconda installer source on github but didn't see the relevant bits. I'm using the centOS 6.10 anaconda installer. Somehow I am ending up with my swap partition on sda1, /boot on sda2, and root on sda3. for $REASONS I want /boot to be the partition #1 (sda1)

Hi! I build VMKit and run some programs successfully. But when using java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock and java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition, I catch a Throwable : java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: sun.misc.Unsafe.unpark(Ljava/lang/Object;)V after using the function : void java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition.await() My test program is as follows: *import* *java.lang*.*;

Hey, I solved my "The installation source given by device ['sdb2'] could not be found". Apparently ignoredisk is so strong it not only ignores the disks to be partitioned but also the disks holding the installation source... Now I ran into: ? In interactive step cleardiskssel, can't continue In anaconda.log I saw: ? step installtype does not exist ? step confirminstall

I have a kickstart file with the following partitioning directives: part /boot --fstype ext3 --onpart=sda1 part pv.100000 --onpart=sda2 --noformat volgroup vol0 pv.100000 --noformat logvol / --vgname=vol0 --name=lvol1 --useexisting --fstype=ext4 logvol /tmp --vgname=vol0 --name=lvol2 --useexisting --fstype=ext4 logvol swap --vgname=vol0 --name=lvol3 --useexisting logvol /data --vgname=vol0

Hi, I created a dummy dialplan where I ask the user to enter the age. [macro-age] exten => s,1,Background(my/age) ;;Play recorded message to enter age exten => s,n,WaitExten(10) exten => _XX,1,Set(AGE=${EXTEN}) ;; this line is not executing, instead dialplan is terminating with error given below. exten => s,n,NoOp(${AGE}) exten => s,n,GotoIf($[${LEN(${AGE})} >

Hi, We are using PXELinux 1.75, ISC DHCP 3.0pl1 and atftp-0.6 to deploy RH 7.3 across a number of Dell Rackmount systems. I would like to set things up so that the RH boot kernel grabs the IP Address, gateway aand DNS address from the first DHCP request with 'ipappend 1', but so far have had no success, Kickstart issue a seconed request after booting the kernel. Here are my configs:

I want to replace an existing 32bit with a 64bit installation (Centos 5). There's an existing LVM with lots of partitions. Most are used for Xen guests. The system itself uses only one of them plus a separate /boot partition that is not on LVM. What's the best course of action here? Should I do the reinstall with kickstart or better manually and reuse the existing filesystem? As I

Hello Gentlemen, I would like to ask a question about an issue I have with the Centos 6.3 installation. I have installed a Centos 6.3 on a server we used before with 5.4 on Friday. I have created a KS file to let me connect to the server via VNC and have all repos and packages preconfigured. I only needed to partition the hard drive using VNC. During the partition process I selected which

I'll be setting up a vSphere 4 environment hosting CentOS 5.4 on Netapp FAS and was curious how you guys are handling the automation of partition alignment within your linux guests. I'd like to use cobbler for dynamically creating kickstart scripts and wasn't sure if I could align my disk during install some how. Are there kickstart arguments to force the alignment on a 4k boundary?

Hi, I am trying to get my kickstart file that worked under 5.1 to work under 5.2 centos x86_64. This is the error that I get. On the screen it says Exception occured and gives me the option to save it. This is that file. I dont see any odd that would cause it to crash. Can anyone help. My kickstart file is in the mix below. Seems to be related to network, my line seems fine (I think) for

Hi - I''m trying to implement a search box that has a pre-filled message "enter search text." The first time it''s selected, I''d like it to clear out, but after that, I''d like it to remain. I imagine lots of people have done this, any ideas how to accomplish this? Thanks, Dino --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this

In ocfs2_add_branch, we use the rightmost rec of the leaf extent block to generate the e_cpos for the new added branch. In the most case, it is OK but if there is a gap between the the root(or branch) 's rightmost rec and the leaf, it will cause kernel panic if we insert some clusters in it. The message is something like: (7445,1):ocfs2_insert_at_leaf:3775 ERROR: bug expression:

All, If I do ruby script/generate model blah, is there an easy way for me to remove all of that stuff that got generated? Something like: ruby script/remove model blah? If it doesn''t exist, is it coming? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Sorry for the long post but attempted this several over the past year with no success but staying on an NT4 domain is no longer viable. Need to get this resolved so hopefully there will be a clue somewhere in this montage. The current PDC is samba-3.6.25 running on Gentoo using tdbsam backend. The new AD will be a Debian LXC container running on Debian Jessie using samba compiled from git

On 07/03/16 19:04, Sonic wrote: > Sorry for the long post but attempted this several over the past year > with no success but staying on an NT4 domain is no longer viable. Need > to get this resolved so hopefully there will be a clue somewhere in > this montage. > > The current PDC is samba-3.6.25 running on Gentoo using tdbsam backend. > The new AD will be a Debian LXC