similar to: SCL devtoolset-3 or 4 without eclipse?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:47:29AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian wrote > Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? > > I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. > > BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 You can do it manually as per the instructions at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC Step 1) Download and

Solaris 11 include samba 3.6.25. I compiled samba 4.5.1 using GCC 4.8 and gmake. Had set following env variables to make sure krb5.conf was found # CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ # C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ After setting "client ldap sasl wrapping = plain" I was able to join to a Windows 2008 domain with samba 4.

I am unable to compile Samba 4.4.7, 4.5.1 or 4.5.3 on Solaris 11. I had been able in the past so maybe an update to GCC broke something. GCC 4.8 is the default. I then installed GCC 4.9. /usr/bin/gcc is a symlink to /usr/gcc/4.9/bin/gcc. I compiled the latest openldap (client only) to the samba target directory. Set environmental variables so the krb5.h and openldap would be found.

Just in case someone is having similar problems and/or following this thread, here's my final "solution" (at least, for now). In my bash build script, prior to configure, I set the C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH to empty strings, and then set some other environment variables instead: export C_INCLUDE_PATH= export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=

I'm continuing this here in llvm-dev since the thread was started here, but, in hindsight, it may have been better in cfe-dev, because the problem seems to be related to clang. I turned on "verbose" mode in make (VERBOSE=1 TOOL_VERBOSE=1) and found that it is clang, not gcc, that is being used at this point in the make. Based on the command issued (particularly with the --sysroot

Has anybody tried (and succeeded) to get gcc 6.3.1 (or devtoolset-6) to work on CentOS 8? In the Animation and Visual Effect industry, gcc 6.3.1 is still the current recommended compiler (see www.vfxplatform.com), and is required to build many plugins. Unfortunately, it is not a "minimum requirement"... It is THE requirement. So I tried to get it from the vault: -- sudo dnf

Are you asking if the new libstdc++ is statically linked into your app only for the new functions but your app remains dynamically linked to the old one for the parts of C++ that have remained unchanged, the answer is ?no?. Your app is linked to the new library, period. You can use ldd(1) to prove this to yourself. I am not so sure. That is what I thought, but then I compiled something with a

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

I want to install several gcc with different versions in centos. The default version of gcc in centos6 is 4.9.3. So I use devtoolset install a higher version of gcc. Then I switch to the higher version of gcc by executing "source /opt/rh/devtoolset-5/enable". But now if I want to switch back to the default gcc, how should I do? By the way, is there any solution to install multiple gcc

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >> >> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more >> packages? >> regards, > devtoolset-6 is available. > somewhere (semi)officially? where? >

On May 19, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Jaros?aw Bober <jaroslaw.bober at gmail.com> wrote: > > Do I have to install devtoolset on all my machines that I want to run this > app? Probably, yes. That, or redistribute parts of it with your app, either by cherrypicking files from the devtoolset RPM or statically linking to it. > Or would it use built-in libstdc++ library, linking

Its seems challenging to maintain applications with a long term vision. For EL6 I want to use devtoolset-3-gcc-c++-4.9.2-6.2.el6.x86_64 to compile some binaries. Here my question: will the binaries execute flawless on a plain EL6 system without additional libraries (stdc++ etc.)? Example: scl enable devtoolset-3 'rpmbuild -ba local-app1.spec' -- Thanks, LF

On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: > devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS > elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 > > isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? > regards, devtoolset-6 is available.

hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L.

I'm attempting to build a native build of clang from the 3.2 source distribution tarballs, but I ran into this build error that's got me really puzzled. My platform is Linux - 32-bit Ubuntu (12.04) running on a PC. Here's the (abbreviated) output from make: *************************************** ... make[3]: Entering directory

Hi, Is there a repository for binaries of the the RHEL devtoolset-2 [1] packages for CentOS 6 ? [1] http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/RHDevToolset/SRPMS/

Hi, is there any way to get access to devtoolset-4 ? I see alot of stuff at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2076 . Is this not yet released? thanks, Kay

Hi! Did anyone tried to use devtoolset from different directory than the default one? from what i can see it would be enough just to change the hardcoded directory in enable file but i would like to hear if someone else tried this ... Thank you! Adrian

I'm looking for the library from subject. It is present in system gcc (4.8.5) but I cannot see it in devtoolset-7. Could You please tell me why is it so?