similar to: dnf and failing epel

On 04/11/16 12:51, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: > Do you get this error when using 'yum'? 'dnf' is provided via EPEL > and isn't part of CentOS, so you might want to consider filing a bug > with EPEL. it seems it might be

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 01:39:40PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: > On 04/11/16 12:51, Jonathan Billings wrote: > it seems it might be Centos' problem, on some of my other boxes I find: > libsolv-0.6.14-1.el7.x86_64 and I wonder if it had been in the repos and > later withdrawn and now absent? And instead we have: > libsolv-0.6.11-1.el7.x86_64 - which is the culprit. libsolv used to be

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it >> automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. > > Can you tell us the DNF for:- > > yum update > yum groupinstall > yum reinstall > yum erase DNF isn't used on CentOS.

I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a drop-in replacement or if some migration setup was required. Is it supposed to work with CentOS or do we ignore it until some future release?

Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: > > hi everyone, > > I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: Do you get this error when using 'yum'? 'dnf' is provided via EPEL and isn't part of CentOS, so you might want to consider filing a bug with EPEL. > ps. I wonder if my email get though to the group, I receive mailing list > emails

Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting security updates anymore, because they are conflicting. I will go to FOSDEM in Belgium this year to figure out more, but I am considering moving my centos systems to rockylinux. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong On 12/16/22 16:59,

Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB???? 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the

On Fri, May 31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Use basename of external helper instead of 'no' for external supermin > > helpers. This gives a clear error messages what binary is actually > > missing, and it is now possible to install the missing package without > > recompiling libguestfs. In addition

On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> hi guys >> >> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only >> contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production >> envs. >> >> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to >> be a viable option to put it on

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 23:40 +0000, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I think it should be called YUM. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#Naming > DNF stands for Dandified yum. Since DNF is a tech preview > in Fedora 18 the Python module names can not be 'yum.*' as > that would clash with yum itself. In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having

Kenneth Porter wrote: > I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on > CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with > dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a For the normal user (like me) dnf is neither better nor worse than yum. In fact it is almost identical. In my view, the introduction of a new

On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? > It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: > > -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock > --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue > rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm

On 08/09/16 03:02, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-08, Always Learning <centos at u68.u22.net> wrote: >> >> In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having multiple >> and incompatible versions of Yum in the same software release is >> bonkers. > > Fedora is the place to try out bonkers stuff. If RedHat is satisfied > with dnf then they

I discovered that 'dnf upgrade' doesn't actually upgrade to the latest versions of packages unless you also supply the '--best' flag. This also changes update -> upgrade, since apparently 'dnf update' is deprecated. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml

Hi, I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf on Fedora desktops. My question is: Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

Hi, as pointed out by Neal Gompa, Mageia recently introduced dnf in the distribution (currently only in Cauldron, which is the future Mageia 6), and most probably it will replace urpmi in the future. As such, on Mageia make supermin prefer dnf over urpmi when found, using the same code already used for Fedora. Related change: make test-harder.sh work explicitly also on Mageia

On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>>>

On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: > On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. >>> >>> Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected