similar to: CentOS 6.8, Iptables 1.4.7, and MASQUERADE

On 20/01/15 20:15, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Sina, > > Am 20.01.2015 um 18:48 schrieb Sina Owolabi: >> Please I need to answer this question... I have a friendly organization >> profiling Linux software solutions as an alternative to a Windows-based >> back end. >> I've been asked to find out if there's an alternative to the Windows Rights >>

Hi all, I'm currently in the process of building a 2-Node libvirt/KVM Cluster and ran into some issues regarding the network connectivity of our virtual machines. Our setup seemed to work fine, we were able to browse to Google and our own company website and some others from within the VM. Then we tried microsoft.com to download some Windows iso images from MS Partner Network. The page

I have a KVM vm running CentOS-6.8 on a host also running CentOS-6.8. This instance is used for occasional development projects which require segregation. Thus it is seldom accessed. At some point in the recent past this guest developed an issue with starting. Specifically these messages were found in the system log files: /var/log/messages-20170312:Mar 10 16:31:06 vhost04 kernel: dracut:

Hello, I've got CentOS 6.8 x64, updated today to the latest by 'yum update' this installed a new kernel: 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 in /var/log/boot.log I found these 3 lines ... No kdump initial ramdisk found. [WARNING] Rebuilding /boot/initrd-2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64kdump.img cp: cannot stat `/lib/firmware/i915/bxt_dmc_ver1.bin': No such file or

Hello, I''m having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux router. The main problem is as follows: I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link for the sites outside my country. These 64kbps are dynamically allocated by my ISP so I usually get something like 128kbps , sometimes 512kbps and even 1 Mbit; it varies all the time. Because of this

Ralf Schneider wrote: > A little bit off topic: Has anybody tried building a concurrent GC - > running in a different _process_, instead of a thread? > The idea: To perform a collection you do a fork(). The child process > collects all unreferenced memory regions and reports them back to the > parent process. I remember reading a paper in ACM Sigplan Notices (I think) many years

Hi List, Please I need to answer this question... I have a friendly organization profiling Linux software solutions as an alternative to a Windows-based back end. I've been asked to find out if there's an alternative to the Windows Rights Management service. Im curious though, if Samba 4 could integrate with it? Thanks!

On 25.08.2016 20:24, ken wrote: > On 08/25/2016 12:08 PM, Walter H. wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've got CentOS 6.8 x64, updated today to the latest by 'yum update' >> this installed a new kernel: 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 >> >> in /var/log/boot.log I found these 3 lines ... >> >> No kdump initial ramdisk found. [WARNING] >>

On Thu, August 25, 2016 23:21, ken wrote: > On 08/25/2016 02:42 PM, Walter H. wrote: >> On 25.08.2016 20:24, ken wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 12:08 PM, Walter H. wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I've got CentOS 6.8 x64, updated today to the latest by 'yum update' >>>> this installed a new kernel: 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64

Hi I have using a Bering (LRP) box with shorewall, and I must enable IP masquedare only a few hosts on my network. I want to enable only masquerade from 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.25. What I must do ? I known that I have to configure the /etc/shorewall/masq file, but I don''t known how. Thanks in advance.

----- Message d'origine ---- > De : Dr.Drej <wineforum-user at winehq.org> > ? : wine-users at winehq.org > Envoy? le : Dimanche, 9 Mars 2008, 12h05mn 50s > Objet : [Wine] Vampire The Masquerade - Bloodlines > > Hi, > > I installed Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines under Wine on Ubuntu Gutsy and > so far it was working fine. But now I ran across a

Hi, I have a linux-box with 3 eth, 2 of us go into 2 ISP. My localnet is masquerade with this rule: Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination SNAT all -- 10.0.0.0/16 anywhere to:211.56.233.186 SNAT all --

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=486 Summary: Invalid Argument in MASQUERADE Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958 Summary: MASQUERADE does not work on recent kernels Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi, I installed Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines under Wine on Ubuntu Gutsy and so far it was working fine. But now I ran across a problem which I then also found in the AppDB: Surveillance-room in bloodbank calls forth major performance-issues due to blitting surface. (fixme:d3d_surface:fb_copy_to_texture_direct Doing a pixel by pixel copy from the framebuffer to a texture, expect major

I am having a problem with the current release of Samba in RedHat 4.2, I believe it is 1.9.16p11. Anyway when logging into my ISP with IP Masquerade turned on I lose the ability to get netbios-ns from the Samba server. I was wondering if anyone has seen this or a workaround for the problem. The tcpdump program reports that the netbios-ns udp port is unreachable or unavailible. As soon as I

Hi, I've an existing tinc switch mode VPN set up with a few nodes. I've now added a new node, but I want this node to route all its traffic through tinc and use one of the tinc nodes as its gateway to the rest of the internet. I've got the device on the VPN and it participates nicely, but I can't talk to the internet at large. When I tcpdump the external interface on the

Hi everyone! I have a little problem here. First let explain my network topology I have a 192.168.0.0/24 network, with win98 workstations, a NT serving domain and another NT as a WINS server. 192.168.0.3 - NT / WINS 192.168.0.6 - NT / DOMAIN 192.168.0.1 - Internet gateway 192.168.0.2 - Wireless AP 200 that connects to a linux gw ==--==-=-=-==-= AIR :) -- --- == --==--=-- =-=- 192.168.0.4 -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi!, ok here is my question, I have 2 ISP''s connected to the firewall, and I already set up th routing tables, I have a 256k and a 1.5m connection, and I want a couple pcs from the internal network to masquerade through the 256k connection and the rest through the 1.5m connection, how do I setup this on shorewall??? I am not subscribed to the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1343 Bug ID: 1343 Summary: With iPv6 masquerade, ICMPv6 time-exceeded pkts are forwarded with bad checksum Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal