similar to: dnf replacing yum?

hi everyone, I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: $ dnf repolist Failed to open: /var/cache/dnf/x86_64/7/x86_64/7/epel/repodata/8415cbb16f52517f34e3edac12a97c9893117f7b9de6cb22fc086048febd1c60-updateinfo.xml.bz2. that file is there, so I tampered with perms & fcontext but to no avail. dnf clean does remove it but on the first contact to epel repo it fails again. Do you see it

Kenneth Porter wrote: > I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on > CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with > dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a For the normal user (like me) dnf is neither better nor worse than yum. In fact it is almost identical. In my view, the introduction of a new

On 05/26/2016 08:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at

On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. >>>>

On Thu, May 26, 2016 9:30 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/26/2016 08:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >>>> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>>>> On 05/25/2016

On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" <subscribed-lists at sterndata.com> wrote: > > On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > > >> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. > > > > Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users")

On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>>>

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:28:09AM +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > > > > Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it > > > automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. > > > > Can you tell us the DNF for:-

On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: > On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. >>> >>> Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected

On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. > > Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement > could be named MUD. > > Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) > > > > There was

On Thu, May 26, 2016 10:51, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 26/05/2016 a las 11:39 a.m., Valeri Galtsev escribi?: >> I guess, it is just me in general unhappy about all Linuxes >> getting much less "UNIX"y lately. > > I feel you Valerei, im switching new server instalations to FreeBSD. > Im tired to spend useful time learning new ways (systemd, firewalld, > dnf,

----- Forwarded message from Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek@redhat.com> ----- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:17:11 +0100 From: Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek@redhat.com> To: bcl@redhat.com, dcantrell@redhat.com, "Lumens, Christopher" <clumens@redhat.com>, pjones@redhat.com, sbueno@redhat.com, christos.triantafyllidis@gmail.com, kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org, clime@redhat.com,

Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting security updates anymore, because they are conflicting. I will go to FOSDEM in Belgium this year to figure out more, but I am considering moving my centos systems to rockylinux. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong On 12/16/22 16:59,

I discovered that 'dnf upgrade' doesn't actually upgrade to the latest versions of packages unless you also supply the '--best' flag. This also changes update -> upgrade, since apparently 'dnf update' is deprecated. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 23:40 +0000, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I think it should be called YUM. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#Naming > DNF stands for Dandified yum. Since DNF is a tech preview > in Fedora 18 the Python module names can not be 'yum.*' as > that would clash with yum itself. In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having

Mageia introduced dnf as alternative package manager for the next version 6, with the possibility to replace urpmi as primary in the future. As such, prefer dnf over urpmi+fakeroot to download rpm packages. Thanks to Neal Gompa for his heads-up. --- README | 3 +-- src/rpm.ml | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 79fcfd8..679bf70

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it >> automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. > > Can you tell us the DNF for:- > > yum update > yum groupinstall > yum reinstall > yum erase DNF isn't used on CentOS.

On 2016-09-08, Always Learning <centos at u68.u22.net> wrote: > > In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having multiple > and incompatible versions of Yum in the same software release is > bonkers. Fedora is the place to try out bonkers stuff. If RedHat is satisfied with dnf then they will include it and not yum in RHELN. Maybe they will make yum an alias to