similar to: softwarecollections/Devtoolset-3 :: usage from different directory

Hi! I want to make the default environment for users the environment of devtoolset .. and i am thinking to do it this way: 1. make /bin/bash-devtools with the content scl enable devtoolset-2 bash "$@" 2. change for the prospective users the shell from /bin/bash to /bin/bash-devtoolset Is this the best way? Do anyone see or know of any pitfalls with this? Thanks a lot! Adrian

Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7, but it can also be found at: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:39 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > > of

Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: devtoolset-3-dyninst for package:

Hi! I have an directory full with rpms that are installed on some machines.. what is the best way to update those rpms to the latest version? are there more optimal approaches then searching for each rpm names in an update repo and download one by one? Thanks, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:28 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7 > > Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the > Cern pages, it says "for Scientific Linux CERN

Its seems challenging to maintain applications with a long term vision. For EL6 I want to use devtoolset-3-gcc-c++-4.9.2-6.2.el6.x86_64 to compile some binaries. Here my question: will the binaries execute flawless on a plain EL6 system without additional libraries (stdc++ etc.)? Example: scl enable devtoolset-3 'rpmbuild -ba local-app1.spec' -- Thanks, LF

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:47:29AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian wrote > Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? > > I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. > > BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 You can do it manually as per the instructions at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC Step 1) Download and

Has anybody tried (and succeeded) to get gcc 6.3.1 (or devtoolset-6) to work on CentOS 8? In the Animation and Visual Effect industry, gcc 6.3.1 is still the current recommended compiler (see www.vfxplatform.com), and is required to build many plugins. Unfortunately, it is not a "minimum requirement"... It is THE requirement. So I tried to get it from the vault: -- sudo dnf

Hi, I am trying to build the LLVM suite on a RedHat Enterprise Linux clone (Scientific Linux <https://www.scientificlinux.org/>). In the latest attempt, the build seems to complete without any explicit failures but the `check-all` process fails. Any ideas about what is wrong or suggestions for how to proceed would be much appreciated. This is the current procedure: sudo yum install

Are you asking if the new libstdc++ is statically linked into your app only for the new functions but your app remains dynamically linked to the old one for the parts of C++ that have remained unchanged, the answer is ?no?. Your app is linked to the new library, period. You can use ldd(1) to prove this to yourself. I am not so sure. That is what I thought, but then I compiled something with a

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

On 07/01/2015 11:51 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates? >> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab >> or messages like : >> RPC: Program not registered > at work, our diskless warewulf setup is still working fine

I want to install several gcc with different versions in centos. The default version of gcc in centos6 is 4.9.3. So I use devtoolset install a higher version of gcc. Then I switch to the higher version of gcc by executing "source /opt/rh/devtoolset-5/enable". But now if I want to switch back to the default gcc, how should I do? By the way, is there any solution to install multiple gcc

Hello, my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled. I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to use new standard. Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then I will be able to run this app on centos 7.x as well? Do I have to install devtoolset on all my

On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS >> elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 >> >> isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more >> packages? >> regards, > devtoolset-6 is available. > somewhere (semi)officially? where? >

On May 19, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Jaros?aw Bober <jaroslaw.bober at gmail.com> wrote: > > Do I have to install devtoolset on all my machines that I want to run this > app? Probably, yes. That, or redistribute parts of it with your app, either by cherrypicking files from the devtoolset RPM or statically linking to it. > Or would it use built-in libstdc++ library, linking

On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: > devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS > elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 > > isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? > regards, devtoolset-6 is available.

Hello Dave, On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7 Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the Cern pages, it says "for Scientific Linux CERN 6" (note the '6'); repodata says '6' too. > but it can also be found at: >

hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L.

Hi! I have a small problem with some packages : i was doing an update over ssh and my connection was interrupted .. now i have a lots of duplicates and if i try to remove them, yum tries to uninstall all system (447 packages 1.4 gb)!! Any idea how can i clean this mess? would be pretty bad if the machine needs to be re-installed only because the connection went bad during the process... Thanks