similar to: Disabling network service in CentOS 7

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

How to configure DNS server and search domain common for all network interfaces not per device? The only reliable way I found we can set DNS name server and search domain in CentOS 7 is using nmcli which adds DNS name server and search domain to *a specific interface*, e.g. nmcli con mod eth0 +ipv4.dns [IP_ADDRESS]. But I want to set them for all interfaces weather they are configure and

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > Hi All, > > I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. > Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red > Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as > expected. > When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but > not connected to

Hi Neil, Thanks for your comments. What's the purpose of creating spurious ?bond0?? It's confusing. Is it anywhere documented? Every time I restart NetworkManager it creates another bond0! Joe On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > >> Hi All, >

Hi All, nmcli tool in CentOS 7.1 uses same fields with upper and lower case with different meanings. What's the difference between pv4.addresses and IP4.ADDRESS in "nmcli con show" command? Where nmcli fields are documented? I searched online but didn't find nmcli documentation. RHEL 7 Networking Guide doesn't explain nmcli options in details. I'd appreciate your

Shorewall 4.5.15 3 Interface setup em1 p3p1 p4p4 ppp0 Hi, Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1. When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer assigns an IP to em1. If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the interfaces, em1 gets an IP of 192.168.1.2. Then when I get

On Tuesday 10 January 2017 08:53:17 John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/9/2017 7:11 PM, fred roller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Frank Cox<theatre at melvilletheatre.com> > > > > wrote: > >> That sounds like a weak signal from your wifi transmitter. > > > > Or signal interference. Where is the antennae located on the server? > > Ran

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:

On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James

Dear Members, Please tell me how can I fix this problem. Against allow imap on firewalld, I cannot access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... telnet: connect to address 153.153.xxx.xxx: No route to host After stopping forewalld I can access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... Connected to

hi guys I have a kvm quest & two nodes. a kvm guest on nodeA and IPaddr2 on nodeB(at this time) nodeA & nodeB comprise a HA cluster now... - nodeA can ping IPaddr2 IP - nodeB can ping kvm guest IP - kvm guest can get to nodeB's IP but* Only a bit non-common bit in my setup is: - both nodeA & nodeB be interfaces which are relevant to the subnet on which it operates are

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I only have ifcfg-lo , which I am pretty sure is the loopback interface. > As expected, other files suggest eth0 is my ethernet connection. > Should I add a one-line ifcfg-eth0 file? If you are using ethernet (and not a wireless device or some other internet connectivity) you should have an ifcfg- file for the interface.

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>>

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > > > Also, it was suggested that I use nmcli in a cronjob to re-activate it if > it > drops. I can check to see if it's still active by 'grep'ing the IP > address, > but I don't know the nmcli to re-activate an existing WIFI connection. > > Can anyone help here too,

This is happening with the Centos7-armv7 image 1804, but I was wondering if it is a broader C7 issue. My image has only 2 ifcfg files:? ifcfg-l0 and -link.? 'ip a' is listing the ethernet as eth0.? ifcfg-link has contains: DEVICE=link BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=on I then used nmcli to create my ifcfg-eth0 nmcli con delete eth0 nmcli con add type ethernet con-name eth0 ifname eth0 ip4

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>>>

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >