similar to: CentOS 7 Lost NIC

Hello Am Friday 11 December 2015, 10:13:00 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 12/11/2015 06:04 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) > > I > > lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. > > > > with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ?

On 03/08/2019 11:17, Patrik wrote: > the problem is that dnsupdate is not working becuase i use dlz. i > cannot use dbsupdate with dnsupdate it fails. > *_ > _* What is 'dbsupdate' ? I can assure you that dnsupdate does work with dlz. I think you need to give us more info. Rowland

I''m running Xen 4.1.4 on Fedora 17. I have some CentOS 6 DomUs - an haproxy machine and some tomcat VMs. When clients send requests with: POST /ProposalInterface HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml Host: www.myhost.co.uk Content-Length: 2099 Expect: 100-continue Connection: Keep-Alive The "continuation" doesn''t happen. The POST is truncated at 1449 bytes, and the

samba generates an unknown ip4 and ip6 address. here is my settings: root at server:/# ifconfig enp1s0f2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.81.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.81.255 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts

Hello I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts connected by a physical switch.  Each host has two NICs leading to the switch, which have been combined into a team, team0. Each host a has a bridge br1, which has team0 as a slave. So communication between hosts is based on the IP address of bridge br1 on each host. Up until

Hi there, I'm playing with CentOS 7 (don't know if it's recommended at all have this one as a development server as maybe is not stable enough yet) and I installed it on a Vmware VM with two network interfaces: one as a bridged connected directly to the physical network and replicating the network state and the second one as a host only interface (the one I use to manage the VM) so

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

hello i have a server colocated in a datacenter with several external IP addresses available to use. the physical server is using one of these IPs, and i want to assign another, unused IP to the virtual machine. i thought i could just do this by editing the container's /etc/network/interfaces, setting a static IP address for eth0 much like i did for br0 on the host machine.... but doesn't

On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> >>> In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581b5e at domblogger.net>, >>> Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>

Hi, I want to use samba as AD. everything seemed to be ok so far with the install and the config. STATUS=daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections Feb 27 10:34:03 ip-1XX winbindd[22083]: [2020/02/27 10:34:03.002858, 0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:124(daemon_ready) Feb 27 10:34:03 ip-1XX winbindd[22083]: STATUS=daemon 'winbindd' finished starting up and

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>>>

Hi, I followed this guide<http://wiki.kartbuilding.net/index.php/Xen_Networking#Routed_Networking_with_NAT_2>, and started my xend service with nat-network support: (network-script network-nat) (vif-script vif-nat) Then I started my domU with the following vif configure: vif = [''ip=10.0.0.1'' ] my domU is a win7 system, and I configured the network as: ip:

Would you mind repeating the test with canreinvite=no set for all you phones and mobile phones? What is your upload bitrate? Is it guaranteed? I would try also to test the PMTU: Try: ping -M do -s 2000 ${ip address of the sip server} You should receive icmp asking for lowering the packet size. The LTE phones could have lower MTU and thus overcome PMTU problem. Marek 2020-06-22 21:48

Hi, I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding device via kickstart (via PXE). I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>>

On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581b5e at domblogger.net>, > Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785 >> >> I can not figure out what I need to do. >> >> Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to

Greetings, I've setup an vm with openwrt in it, defined a isolated lan between the vm and the host and booted the vm up. I see the vm is up, made sure the vnic is visible in both the host and guest and added it to the br in the guest. I've issued an dhcpd call on the vnic (labeled vnic0) in the host and got an ip, see: dagg@NCC-5001D ~ $ dhcpcd vnet0 DUID

Dear Centos Users: I installed Centos 7 on my server a few months ago. While using ssh, there is always a strange message "Write failed: Broken pipe?. It forces quit of SSH. It?s really annoying as it happens very often with irregular time interval - from a couple of minutes to a few hours. I have been working using Linux (Red Hat, Fedora and Centos) over 15 years. This didn?t happen for me