similar to: rsyslog.conf

Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >> Behalf Of Leon Fauster >>Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) >> <Dave.Windsor at us.bosch.com>: >>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >> >>Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) > > Perhaps I should say instead that it "strongly encourages" top posting, >

Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) <Dave.Windsor at us.bosch.com>: > Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) -- LF

On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Leon Fauster >>Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:20 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] rsyslog.conf >> >>Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave

Looking at the same manpage, it seems that these selectors are not really being removed, just renamed. The old names are being deprecated. Instead of Use ========== === warn warning err error panic emerg Best regards Dave Windsor AdP/TEF7 -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of m.roth at 5-cent.us Sent:

On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO. > It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But you're > not likely to get the worst offenders to change. totally concur but as long as people are going to use cell phones as mobile computer substitutes, and considering how painful text editing on a

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Leon Fauster >Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:20 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] rsyslog.conf > >Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) <Dave.Windsor at us.bosch.com>: >> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults

On Thu, July 23, 2015 13:19, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Physically dragging the thread back on topic... > > I really am going crazy, trying to deal with the hourly logs from the > loghost. We've got 170+ servers and workstations... but a *very* large > percentage of what's showing up is from his bloody new fedora 22, with > its idiot systemd logging of *ever* selinux

Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... Best regards Dave Windsor AdP/TEF7

On 07/23/2015 09:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- <snip> >>>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >>> >>> Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) <snip> >> >> Perhaps I should say instead that it "strongly

Just thought I'd pass along an error I received this weekend after upgrading two servers to 5.6. Both are HP Proliant DL380 servers running 64-bit, but one is a G6 model and one is a G7. After the upgrade and the reboot to the 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 kernel, both servers displayed the following error at boot: "pci_mmcfg_init marking 256MB space uncacheable." Some Googling

Hello Everyone, I recently installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a brand new ProLiant DL380 G7. I have identical OS software running reock-solid on two other DL380 ProLiant servers, but they are G6 models, not G7. On the G7, the installation went perfectly and the machine ran great for about 2 weeks, when it just seemed to "stop". The system stopped responding on the network, and there was

Hi Friends, I am running most of my company's Linux Servers on Centos 4.x/5.x 32 and 64-bit. I am now trying to configure a centralized logging server where logs of all the linux servers will be stored and also I want to store all the logs on the local server aka means logs will be sent to the central log server but also will be stored on the local server. The reason for storing the logs

On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/23/2015 09:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- > <snip> >>>>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >>>> >>>> Outlook forces you to write above ? :-)

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:19:44PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I really am going crazy, trying to deal with the hourly logs from the > loghost. We've got 170+ servers and workstations... but a *very* large > percentage of what's showing up is from his bloody new fedora 22, with its > idiot systemd logging of *ever* selinux message to /var/log/messages. systemctl enable

On 07/30/2015 10:24 AM, Wes James wrote: > What?s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there?s only a few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What?s worse, top posting or no snipping? > No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO. It wastes space and time

Hi, My rsyslog is not working as expected. I have some thing in rsyslog.d that do well, like this: # Log all iptables stuff separately :msg, contains, "iptables: " { action(type="omfile" file="/var/log/iptraf/info") } No problems with that. Bu what's in /etc/rsyslog.conf like: mail.* /var/log/mail/info don't do anything at all. Rsyslogd -N1 is OK,

Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this comes from upstream (and most likely from the rsyslog project itself), but what's your opinion about Google Ads in system documentation files? > >> [peckel at mucnvjmppmtr01 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.7 (Santiago) >> [peckel at mucnvjmppmtr01 ~]$ grep google

Will Samba support "fallback" to local domain for authentication of local users? I joined a RHEL4 server running Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.11 to a Windows 2000/2003 mixed-mode domain today using "security = domain", after having run for many months in "security = user" mode. Authentication works fine for users defined in the Windows domain, but we have a few users (mainly

Hi all! Is anybody here using rsyslog? I am looking for the right solution how to use rsyslog in CentOS 5 as the default logging daemon. We use it because of filtering using regular expressions. I switched from sysklogd to rsyslog simply using chkconfig --del syslog chkconfig --add rsyslog chkconfig rsyslog on service syslog stop service rsyslog start but this seems not to be

Hello, I'm trying to send Dovecot logs to a Graylog server. To do this, I'd like to pass logs to rsyslog and rsyslog pass logs to remote Graylog server. I set in dovecot.conf : syslog_facility = local5.info I set in rsyslog.conf : local5.info @192.168.xxx.xxx:5555 Restarted services and it doesn't work. I use nmap to test if port 5555 is opened and this port is open. What