similar to: Multiple network cards - routing issue?

I have dealt with machines that have multiple network cards in them before, but never when they were on the same subnet so this issue has never come up before. My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was disabled, and vice versa. On our local

On 07/18/2015 10:41 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > I then ran the following three commands: > > ip route add 204.83.15.0/24 dev eth1 table access1 > ip route add default via 204.83.15.254 dev eth1 table access1 > ip rule add from 204.83.15.1/32 lookup access1 ... > Can any of you folks tell me what I've missed? Does the system work correctly if you don't run those "ip

On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:37:30 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/18/2015 10:12 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > Interesting. But since it's still exactly the same, it's still not > > working; it still fails in exactly the same way too. > > Yes, but that means you need to start with the standard troubleshooting > stuff. Do you have link? Is the Ethernet cable working?

I can't seem to dial out with Voicepulse Open Access service using *. Incoming works fine. Another user posted a few weeks back that they were having problems and there are some threads at dslreports.com about this as well. Maybe someone here can figure out what the issue is from the sip debug info below. I am at a loss. The audible error message from Allison is 0984 (from VP server) Here is

On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 21:34:27 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > Does the system work correctly if you don't run those "ip route" commands? It's exactly the same. And what I mean by exactly the same is EXACTLY the same. I rebooted the system which should clear out my route commands and whatnot, and discovered that everything (route -n and ip route show and whatnot) are exactly

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/bmp Size: 2918 bytes Desc: Picture (Metafile) Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050307/cb404791/attachment.bmp

Hello all Here is the scenario: We have a mail server VM which currently has two virtual NICs attached to it. One NIC is has an IP on a subnet with a default gateway defined and the other NIC has an IP on a different subnet with a different gateway on a different VLAN defined. Now when I activate both NICs, and run an ifconfig -a, I see that both IP addresses are showing. Now here is the

Am 19.07.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Frank Cox: > On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:37:30 -0700 > Gordon Messmer wrote: [ ... ] > Do you see > any traffic if you run "tcpdump -nn -i eth1"? > > I see no traffic on eth1 with that command until I log into another session and type "ping google.com". Then I get this output: > > [root at audio ~]# tcpdump -nn -i eth1 >

I recently upgraded a server''s rubygems from 0.9.0 to 1.2.0. Upon doing so, one of our apps that uses soap4r thinks all the security certificates it sees are invalid (see Error 1 below). I tried reverting to 0.9.0, but anything that uses rubygems crashes now (see Error 2 below). If anyone could help me solve either problem, that would be great. Ideally, I''d like to run the latest

I have an Intel SS4000E fileserver that I've been using for several years to backup my home directory to. I have a daily cron job that runs the following command: rsync -av --delete /home/frankcox/ /mnt/fileserver/backup I have a directory named misc/sheet-music/classical. About a week ago I created a new subdirectory there, /home/frankcox/misc/sheet-music-classical/Russian\ and\ Eastern\

On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:27:09 +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Clearly your gateway 204.83.15.254 does not act like it should. Look > broken or misconfigured, at least from within your network. This server has three network cards in it. I just disabled (unconfigured) eth1 and configured eth2 with the external IP address and whatnot. Plugged in the modem to eth2 and away she goes.

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:04:58 -0700 > Jim Perrin wrote: > > > Yes. This command will drop an 'active-profile' file in /etc/tuned that > > will be used and survive reboots, kernel updates, etc. > > [root at mutt frankcox]# tuned-adm active > Current active profile: virtual-guest

Hi Kostya, On April 11, 2017 at 1:30:10 PM, Kostya Serebryany (kcc at google.com) wrote: > of course, but accesses are done via pointers, and if TBAA queries > MayAlias(AccessViaP1, AccessViaP2) > there should (??) be a point in the IR where both P1 and P2 exist together > and can be compared. That may not be possible (though I'm second guessing what exactly you have in mind so

On 09/21/2017 07:02 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Jim Perrin wrote: >> Last week we noticed that the default scheduler isn't being set properly >> in CentOS 7. I haven't checked this for CentOS 6, but it might be worth >> exploring. >> >> The TL;DR is unless you're running CentOS 7 on a laptop or as a virtual >>

I have a wsdl client that will work standalone but as soon as I put identical code into a Rails controller I get an Errno::ECONNREFUSED #(Connection refused -connect(2)...) Any ideas? ======================= ||Standalone: (works) || ======================= require ''soap/wsdlDriver'' require ''http-access2'' user = ''fwkaufm'' wsdl

I was troubleshooting a problem with incoming calls to my VoicePulse Open Access (NOT Connect) numbers not coming in and I noticed the following in the SIP debug... >Found peer 'roamer1-vpoa' >Looking for s00****** in ivr-incoming Why are the calls getting sent to this weird "s00******" extension and not the usual "s" extension in context ivr-incoming as they

I just noticed this, which doesn't actually seem to affect anything but does create a mystery: [frankcox at mutt temp]$ cat test.c #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("Hello world\n"); return 0; } [frankcox at mutt temp]$ gcc -o test test.c [frankcox at mutt temp]$ file test test: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared

Has any messed with getting Asterisk to work using the Voice Pulse Open Access plan? I currently have 2 numbers with Voice Pulse, 1 is a number that is assigned to their hardware device (Sipura SPA-2000), the other is a Open Access number that uses SIP from any device (you must authenticate with them). I want to be able to use the Open Access number on my Asterisk server here at home with no FXO

Hello, I have a gentoo system that I am trying to remotely develop rails applications on using apache and fcgi. I created the simple hello world example from Dave Thomas'' book to test the system and I receive an "application error" when I try to go to the page. I can startup webrick and use links to view the page just fine, but nothing doing through apache. I have

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 01:31:16PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:27:09 +0200 > Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > Clearly your gateway 204.83.15.254 does not act like it should. Look > > broken or misconfigured, at least from within your network. > > This server has three network cards in it. I just disabled (unconfigured) eth1 and configured eth2 with