similar to: firefox 38 question

m.roth at 5-cent.usschreef: Chuck Campbell wrote: > Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5? > > It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything > saying the problems noted here have been fixed. Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here complaining about it breaking language support for 6, and I *know* that some folks

The subject line is deliberate. It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2 upon us. Addons are downloaded into /tmp, but never installed. Not even Install addon from file works. Going back to ff31. Grumbling ...

OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or Firefox 2, the theme reloaded (1.0.8). These two addons are critical to me. So I have snaged the FF 24.8.0 rpms from the CentOS 5 vault and downgraded to this version and blocked further updates of FF.

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:39:15PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > The subject line is deliberate. > > It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of > http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2 upstream is aware of it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221368 Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

On 05/20/2015 10:47 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:39:15PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: >> >> The subject line is deliberate. >> >> It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of >> http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2 > > upstream is aware of it: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221368 > >

I have the following problem with outputting multilingual data to a file. I get (except for Korean) what I expect as result in the RGui, but when I use sink() to output to a text file loose the characters in the foreign languages. I post a small example below. Since I am not sure how well my email system as the list copes with all the different characters I have additionally created a pdf

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:40:38 +0100 Alexander Spannagel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 22.02.19 um 17:02 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > If you do have 'files sss winbind' in /etc/nsswitch.conf' and sssd > > is running, then it is highly likely that even if winbind is > > running, it will not be used. You also shouldn't use winbind

I managed to get an account set up on the centos bugzilla, after futzing with it for a half hour, but for the life of me I cannot get to the page where I would enter a new one. my browser just says "transferring data from bugs.centos.org" and sits there with the little thingie going round and round. for an hour or more. disconnect and try again. same thing. I've been trying for over

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16148 Summary: primary display is borked with RandR12 enabled Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: > Maybe a workaround?? We use winbind and default domain.? Therefore > there are two records from

My server is running Rails 2.3.4...am I not doing this correctly or is something borked? >> c=Contact.last => #<Contact id: 24, name: "Larry", email: "larry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org", phone: 2147483647, account_id: 8, created_at: "2009-11-27 18:16:25", updated_at: "2009-11-27 18:40:08", hide_name: false, hide_phone: false,

I imported a spreadsheet into a variable sh e.g. sh$aaaa, sh$bbbb, etc... doing the following: tsSource <- ts(paste("sh$",NAMEVARIABLE,sep="") ... ) fails. The paste isn't evaluating properly. What is the proper way to concatenate a data source with a member name such that they evaluate properly. actual code below: doEnv <-

Followed the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html The upgrade borked. Error message: Can't find 'kernel' When I checked with ls /boot/kernel/, the directory does exist. :-( Since the system has encrypted root partion with ZFSonROOT, I tried to follow instructions at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=8958 to boot

Hi, I am trying to do some simple ingress limiting based on fwmark. I know the ability and sense to do INGRESS limiting is ehm... limited ;-) but still I want to try it. I tried several things. === 1 === tcq ingress handle ffff: tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 12mbit burst 10k drop tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw police rate 10mbit burst 10k drop

Samba 2.2.3a on OS-X 10.2.6 Trying to get a standalone server up and running with user level security. All the users have valid accounts and passwords, but we've enabled password sync and password chat and chat debug for the accounts as we don't do authentication against the active directory. unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat debug = yes passwd chat

Rowland, I tried that already, but I made two break-throughs. First, I went to a location where it was working. I realized then that I had put in the SID for the PPTP group at that location. You know, the "S-1-15-xyz" number? Now while I was there, I noted that they were running 4.1 stable. I upgraded them to 4.3 stable. Guess what? The VPN broke! Something with ntlm_auth and 4.3 stable

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:40:46 +0100 Alexander Spannagel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 22.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:35:53 +0100 > > Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 01:59:15PM +0100, Alexander Spannagel

I''m sure something is borked in my app, but I can''t seem to track it down. A few commits back, my app was fully passing my spec suite. It was on Rails 3.0.0 and Rspec 2.0.0.beta.20. I''ve now upgraded to rails 3.0.1 and rspec 2.0.1 Now, I''m getting tons, and I mean tons of failures that say things like, to take a simple case: 113) SiteController GET

Hey! I have two Centos4.2 servers using the same yum configuration (identical files, edited on one and copied to the other), which both report no updates [besides squid which is afaict still currently borked] via "yum check-update". At the same time package versions don't match (cups is in the base/updates pair of repositories): [1]# rpm -q cups cups-libs cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.8

Hi list, Maybe this is a simple filesystem question.. but here it goes. We have a samba-3.0.12 + LDAP domain, today a profile of mine got borked it just stands there like it was loading but it freezes, I went to the server and deleted the profile dir and on the workstation to start a new one. It worked as expected but now I see it was created with diferent perms on 3.0.12 that with 3.0.10 ?