CentOS - Dec 2005 - CUPS rpm version on centos4

Hey!

I have two Centos4.2 servers using the same yum configuration (identical 
files, edited on one and copied to the other), which both report no 
updates [besides squid which is afaict still currently borked] via
"yum check-update".

At the same time package versions don't match (cups is in the 
base/updates pair of repositories):

[1]# rpm -q cups cups-libs
cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.8
cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.8

[2]# rpm -q cups cups-libs
cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.9
cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.9

Any ideas?

Cheers,
MaZe.

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 16:16 +0100, Maciej ?enczykowski
wrote:
> Hey!
> 
> I have two Centos4.2 servers using the same yum configuration (identical 
> files, edited on one and copied to the other), which both report no 
> updates [besides squid which is afaict still currently borked] via
> "yum check-update".
> 
> At the same time package versions don't match (cups is in the 
> base/updates pair of repositories):
> 
> [1]# rpm -q cups cups-libs
> cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.8
> cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.8
> 
> [2]# rpm -q cups cups-libs
> cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.9
> cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.9
> 
> Any ideas?
We are pushing the new cups now ... (it was a security update)

some mirrors have it, other don't yet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051222/a6774d8a/attachment-0001.sig>

> We are pushing the new cups now ... (it was a security update)
>
> some mirrors have it, other don't yet
Ah, that explains a lot... I was under the impression both were updating 
off of the same mirror (my own), but it seems the backup mirrors were not 
in failover but in round-robin (or whatever it's called) mode... stupid 
me.

Cheers,
MaZe.