similar to: Mailman, junk mail, DMARC and DKIM

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0706.html Looks like they have fixed the problem. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

On Fri, November 7, 2014 12:10, Bob Marcan wrote: > Hi. > Your mails to centos mailing list are constantly marked as spam by > gmail.com. > Marking it nospam is annoying and had no effect on gmail filtering. > I can filter it into the proper folder, but this will only fix my problem. > Can you do anything in that matter? > > Best regards, Bob > I do not think that I

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header > > to the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list > > on planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple

Am 28.03.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:11 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 >> Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> are you sure about that Andrew ? > > All my samba list messages are 'munged' as I described. > >> If I log into

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header to > the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list on > planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple - period So, e-mail is hard these days, and mailing list e-mail is even harder. Read up about the interactions between

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 20:49:26 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:11 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 > >> Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> > >>

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:11 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > are you sure about that Andrew ? All my samba list messages are 'munged' as I described. > If I log into Mailman and go to 'Reply-To: header munging' it tells me > that we aren't removing any

On Wed, November 12, 2014 15:50, g wrote: > > > On 11/12/2014 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> >> Well, no. Per the headers: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: >> centos-bounces at centos.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) >> smtp.mail=centos-bounces at centos.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not

Following the most recent kernel updates I restarted our outgoing SMTP MTA which was recently reconfigured to DKIM sign messages using OpenDKIM. This morning I discovered that Postfix had stopped on that server. Whether it is related to the Postfix issue or not is yet to be determined but, in the process of getting things restarted I ran across this error with Open DKIM: # service opendkim

We have a bunch of lists hosted on a CentOS-4.9 server running sendmail and mailman that we are moving to a CentOS-6 vm running postfix and mailman. I am testing the setup and I am running into a problem no doubt caused by my own ignorance wrt postfix. Based on groking the web I discovered that the recommended way to configure postfix to work with mailman is a script called

so... I've got some mailman lists running on centos 6. apparently c6 has mailman 2.1.12, which is far too old to have the dmarc patches (introduced in 2.1.16 and updated in 2.1.??, so of course, I'm having ongoing issues with yahoo/sbc/att/aol/etc subscribers and bouncing messages ending up causing 30%+ of my subscribers not to be able to get mail. These are mostly non-technical

On 2019-09-17 09:06, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > Hi guys, > > when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I > received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this > problem and if so how? > That is why DMARC took 10 years of heated discussions, before it was actually implemented - in first place by big boys who will never

There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am seeing this: warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused I tried to yum history rollback to 2.9.1 but that package has disappeared so I am evidently constrained to resolve this. Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting that message? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a

Hi guys, when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how? This is the first report: This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200. The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy. For

On Tue, March 31, 2015 16:18, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400 > James B. Byrne wrote: > >> Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be >> getting that message? > > I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a > "rpmsave" file left after installing the update? If so, that's your > old

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have run across this: [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC -U"BROCKLEY\administrator" INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306 /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA' INFO 2020-06-25