similar to: EBtables Problem

Hi, On 11-04-2015 06:00, Mehmet Allar wrote: > Hello , > > I have recently downloaded and setup Centos 7 1503 on a device and > encountered a remote connection problem which I was only able to solve via > removing ebtables package . > > After setup , I wanted go forward with IPtables instead of Firewalld , so > remove firewalld and install iptables. After configuration and

On 4/11/2015 2:00 AM, Mehmet Allar wrote: > After setup , I wanted go forward with IPtables instead of Firewalld , so > remove firewalld and install iptables. After configuration and tests , I > installed Fail2Ban ,(which brought ebtables with it ) and after reboot I > was not able to connect to the device. where did you install fail2ban from? I don't believe its in the C7 base

I am trying to install Firewalld. I am using CENTOS 7. Please help me to solve the error. [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl enable firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Thu

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1259 Bug ID: 1259 Summary: Handling of EPROTONOSUPPORT in ebtables breaking Ubuntu 18.04 apt-get upgrade Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Now I am following you. FYI [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Wed 2015-11-25 17:20:14 SGT; 24s ago Process: 2865 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Bug ID: 1347 Summary: ebtables-nft: regression in -o option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee:

Hi, At http://sourceforge.net/projects/ebtables/ you can find the following new releases: ebtables-brnf-3-vs-2.4.22 Changes: - let iptables see VLAN tagged IP traffic - bugfix for queued packets that get mangled in userspace - ebt_among module (Grzegorz Borowiak) - ebt_limit module (Tom Marshall) The patch compiles but I've done no further tests, but I probably didn't screw up.

Hi everyone, I am working on packet filtering at mac layer. I want to use ebtables. I am using Fedora core 2. But I am unable use the ebtables eventhough all the modules are enabled at the time of kernel compilation. Plz suggest me how to use ebtables in Fedora core 2 Phani

Hello List, with CentOS 7.2 it is not longer possible to run fail2ban on a Server ? I install a new CentOS 7.2 and the EPEL directory yum install fail2ban I don't change anything only I create a jail.local to enable the Filters [sshd] enabled = true .... ..... When I start afterward fail2ban systemctl status fail2ban is clean But systemctl status firewalld is broken ? firewalld.service -

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1674 Bug ID: 1674 Summary: ebtables causing packet loss Product: ebtables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ebtables-nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi, I have a standard Centos7 AMI. Can anyone tell me whats happening here? Thanks, Andrew Aug 19 11:17:23 master dhclient[22897]: bound to 10.141.10.49 -- renewal in 1795 seconds. Aug 19 11:17:24 master network: Determining IP information for eth0... done. Aug 19 11:17:24 master network: [ OK ] Aug 19 11:17:24 master systemd: Started LSB: Bring up/down networking. Aug 19 11:23:43 master

Dear all, I configure my kvm vm like this: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:dd:b2:c5'/> <source bridge='nw-vpc-1017'/> <target dev='if-57'/> <model type='virtio'/> <filterref filter='clean-traffic'> <parameter name='IP'

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481 Bug ID: 1481 Summary: [ebtables-nft] ebtables -E gives error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

Hello, I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system. I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system all is working ? BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7 1511 on this systems fail2ban don't work anymore. I have this error or more, in the firewalld 2015-12-19 08:39:55 ERROR: COMMAND_FAILED: '/sbin/iptables -w2 -t filter -I

Hi all... Recently a new Fail2Ban was available among some other updates for my Centos 7 system, and I just updated all. It seems that was a very BAD idea. Just noticed that Fail2Ban have generated a 6MB error log because of the update, and FirewallD a 1MB log of errors ! (not sure if any of those were really working after this) ok, I'll just run yum downgrade fail2ban I thought. Naa, no

I would like to set up an ACL for an ethernet port using ebtables rules, and if a security violation occurs, to physically disable the port (i.e. whatever "ifconfig down" does). I did not see such a feature in the ebtables man page. Does this exist anywhere, or do I have to create a new extension for it? -- Dan Eble <dane@aiinet.com> _____ . | _

Hi all, I''m trying to use OpenVPN as a VPN solution on a firewall running Shorewall. The IPSEC VPN I tried first has shown a little bit unstable under several conditions, especially with Windows clients. As OpenVPN is best run in ''bridged'' mode (see http://fedoranews.org/contributors/florin_andrei/openvpn/), I became interested in the bridge capabilities of

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on an Internet-facing server. SELinux is in permissive mode for debugging. I've removed FirewallD and replaced it with a custom-made Iptables script. I've also installed and configured Fail2ban (fail2ban-server package) to protect the server from brute force attacks. Out of the box, Fail2ban doesn't seem to play well with SELinux. Here's what I

P? Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:53:38 +0000 John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> skrev: > Just a random stab in the dark, but CEntOS6 was iptables, and CentOS7 > is firewalld. They take different fail2ban packages. > > CentOS6 = fail2ban > CentOS7 = fail2ban-firewalld > > Are you sure you are running the correct fail2ban package for your > firewall? (I screwed this up myself

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> As suggested by Kees[1], replace the old-style 0-element array members of multiple structs in ebtables.h with modern C99 flexible array. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5E8E0F9C-EE3F-4B0D-B827-DC47397E2A4A at kernel.org/ Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com>