Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64"
2015 Apr 04
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/04/15 00:13, Always Learning wrote:
> Posted on behalf of Mark (m.roth at 5-cent.us) who is currently
> experiencing technical difficulties with his Internet connection
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>
>>> I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the
>
2015 Apr 02
8
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in
/etc/os-release
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the
> > iso file name.
>
> You may wear them, many of us
2015 Apr 03
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the
> project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change ........
But first one ought to know exactly where the "project" is going. In
which direction is Centos heading ?
Am I mistaken in thinking, after reading recent postings, Centos is
2015 Apr 03
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who
> might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as
> commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right
> directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ...
> thoughts ?
I really think that if someone
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
>> However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function.
>
> GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill,
> If it's a matter of defaulting to the C personality function, then that should be a fairly easy change to make. I'll look into it, though it may take a backseat to other things that I have to do right now unless someone else wants to.
I'll add this to the list of exception handling problems: it should be possible
to write this level of simple eh code without a selector,
2015 Dec 03
11
7.2 kernel panic on boot
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine
How can I go about diagnosing the problem here?
thanks
Duncan
2015 Mar 31
18
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines.
This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503.
This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1
As always, read through the Release Notes at :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes
2015 Mar 31
18
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines.
This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503.
This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1
As always, read through the Release Notes at :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes
2010 Jun 03
5
Is this failed Asterisk setup typical?
Hello
I just read this article and would like some feedback from
experienced Asterisk users:
===============
"Failed open source VoIP deployment leads to hosted VoIP strategy" By
Jessica Scarpati
"When budgets are crimped, open source voice over IP (VoIP) solutions
look attractive -- a little extra work for a lower cap-ex. But those
savings came at a high price for one Texas
2015 Apr 01
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/01/2015 03:33 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> If someone (currently anonymous) at Centos says abandon sub-version
> numbers and introduce an illogical ISOs naming structure, a wise person
> will ignore that command.
So, in essence you're saying that the builders of the OS that you use
and trust for daily tasks are unwise, right? Sounds to me like you
might want to use something
2014 Mar 13
4
questions on clock catchup
In http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsTime , we could find there are
three attributes of catchup tickpolicy: limit, threshold and slew.
"
The catchup element has three optional attributes, each a positive integer.
The attributes are threshold, slew, and limit.
"
The xml format likes:
<clock offset='utc'>
<timer name='rtc'
2019 Oct 17
2
Centos 8 Mate?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
> >
> > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment.
>
2017 Apr 24
3
OT: systemd Poll - So Long, and Thanks for All the fish.
On 04/20/2017 05:55 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> ... I find that most hardware is ready to fall over by the time the
> CentOS that was installed on it drops out of support anyway.
> ...
James' point isn't the hardware cost, it's the people cost for
retraining. In many ways the Fedora treadmill is easier, being that
there are many more smaller jumps than the huge leap from C6
2015 Apr 02
4
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/01/2015 08:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> 1. What is the logically reason for this alleged "improvement" ?
I never said it was an improvement. I just said that I didn't think it
was that big of a deal, and it boggles my mind that people are calling a
change of an ISO's file name 'unwise' and even comparing it to a
Microsoft move. I just don't see it as
2010 May 28
6
zfs send/recv reliability
After looking through the archives I haven''t been able to assess the reliability of a backup procedure which employs zfs send and recv. Currently I''m attempting to create a script that will allow me to write a zfs stream to a tape via tar like below.
# zfs send -R pool at something | tar -c > /dev/tape
I''m primarily concerned with in the possibility
2012 May 12
1
[ask] how register become contribute
Dear All,
i want to ask about contribute for centos, in site
http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute i see L10n, my question how to
register to L10n so i can contribute how to centos for my languange
(Indonesia), whether in CentOS Community don't a kind of ambassador
centos for example "ambassador fedora" and i am sorry speak english
still bad
Thank for information :)
With best regards,
2010 May 23
12
Puppet Dashboard error.
Hi i have the running i both sides, client and server sides the puppet
0.25.4
Get this error on server side:
puppetmasterd[5363]: Report puppet_dashboard failed: wrong Content-Length
format
And receive this error on my client side:
warning: Value of ''preferred_serialization_format'' (pson) is invalid for
report, user default (b64_zlib_yaml)
I am getting any reports on my
2015 Apr 03
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/03/2015 09:16 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Hmmmmm. I wonder how the proposed 7.1.1503 became 7.1503 in practice.
> Bait and switch?
The versioning of the ISO's is 7.1503 (in one way of reading the actual
name; you could read it as 7 spin 1503 or whatnot), but my
/etc/centos-release says:
[lowen at dhcp-pool114 ~]$ cat /etc/centos-release
CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in
> /etc/os-release
In that particular place it is actually rather important, but that is
orthogonal to the ISO name.