similar to: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64"

2015 Apr 04
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/04/15 00:13, Always Learning wrote: > Posted on behalf of Mark (m.roth at 5-cent.us) who is currently > experiencing technical difficulties with his Internet connection > --------------------------------- > > > >> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: >> >>> I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the >
2015 Apr 02
8
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us
2015 Apr 03
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the > project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change ........ But first one ought to know exactly where the "project" is going. In which direction is Centos heading ? Am I mistaken in thinking, after reading recent postings, Centos is
2015 Apr 03
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who > might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as > commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right > directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ... > thoughts ? I really think that if someone
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. > > GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill, > If it's a matter of defaulting to the C personality function, then that should be a fairly easy change to make. I'll look into it, though it may take a backseat to other things that I have to do right now unless someone else wants to. I'll add this to the list of exception handling problems: it should be possible to write this level of simple eh code without a selector,
2010 Jun 03
5
Is this failed Asterisk setup typical?
Hello I just read this article and would like some feedback from experienced Asterisk users: =============== "Failed open source VoIP deployment leads to hosted VoIP strategy" By Jessica Scarpati "When budgets are crimped, open source voice over IP (VoIP) solutions look attractive -- a little extra work for a lower cap-ex. But those savings came at a high price for one Texas
2014 Mar 13
4
questions on clock catchup
In http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsTime , we could find there are three attributes of catchup tickpolicy: limit, threshold and slew. " The catchup element has three optional attributes, each a positive integer. The attributes are threshold, slew, and limit. " The xml format likes: <clock offset='utc'> <timer name='rtc'
2015 Dec 03
11
7.2 kernel panic on boot
Hi All After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine How can I go about diagnosing the problem here? thanks Duncan
2019 Oct 17
2
Centos 8 Mate?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? > > > > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. >
2015 Mar 31
18
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503. This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1 As always, read through the Release Notes at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes
2015 Mar 31
18
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503. This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1 As always, read through the Release Notes at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes
2010 May 28
6
zfs send/recv reliability
After looking through the archives I haven''t been able to assess the reliability of a backup procedure which employs zfs send and recv. Currently I''m attempting to create a script that will allow me to write a zfs stream to a tape via tar like below. # zfs send -R pool at something | tar -c > /dev/tape I''m primarily concerned with in the possibility
2012 May 12
1
[ask] how register become contribute
Dear All, i want to ask about contribute for centos, in site http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute i see L10n, my question how to register to L10n so i can contribute how to centos for my languange (Indonesia), whether in CentOS Community don't a kind of ambassador centos for example "ambassador fedora" and i am sorry speak english still bad Thank for information :) With best regards,
2010 May 23
12
Puppet Dashboard error.
Hi i have the running i both sides, client and server sides the puppet 0.25.4 Get this error on server side: puppetmasterd[5363]: Report puppet_dashboard failed: wrong Content-Length format And receive this error on my client side: warning: Value of ''preferred_serialization_format'' (pson) is invalid for report, user default (b64_zlib_yaml) I am getting any reports on my
2010 Mar 04
1
mysqlWriteTable . error in your SQL syntax?
Hi, Can somebody advice on weird mysqlWriteTable bug. > mysqlWriteTable(conn, 'comparison',design2, row.names = F, overwrite=T) Error in mysqlExecStatement(conn, statement, ...) : RS-DBI driver: (could not run statement: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '"condition"
2006 Jan 28
0
FLAC / EAC Help
Hello! I'm new here, so forgive in advance any ignorance if you will. I have two issues... One involved using flacattack.exe, and the other involves burning from cuesheets. Issue #1: --------- Any time I rip from EAC into flacattack.exe, and the disc being ripped includes various artists, flacattack.exe crashes on the second track. The error I get (from the DOS window that flacattack runs
2015 Apr 01
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/01/2015 03:33 PM, Always Learning wrote: > If someone (currently anonymous) at Centos says abandon sub-version > numbers and introduce an illogical ISOs naming structure, a wise person > will ignore that command. So, in essence you're saying that the builders of the OS that you use and trust for daily tasks are unwise, right? Sounds to me like you might want to use something
2005 Jun 08
1
Speex FLOP requirements
Jean-Marc, I'm an embedded systems designer and am in the process of selecting a hardware platform to run a Linux-Speex VoIP application. Being concerned with size and power consumption I must choose a processor with a minimal amount of computational power. To that end I've narrowed my search to number of different products that reference the popular "SiSoft Sandra(TM)"
2013 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
At 2013-09-09 13:07:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/09/2013 05:18 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Also, I wonder if your runs include the dependence analysis. If this is >>> the