similar to: Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > > Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 > ) on

On Fri, April 3, 2015 9:31 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh >> > Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00 >> > To: centos at centos.org >>

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's >

It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us

On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who > might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as > commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right > directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ... > thoughts ? I really think that if someone

Dear R commnuity, Thanks a lot for your help. I want to read in tables, the problem is that the table is composed in a difficult way. In ariginal it looks like this: 669 736 842101610481029114711811166124312081128117611221026 9581024 992 685 720 829 925 995 96010241057116611501104106410711092 983 908 989 904 924 896 882 897 909 933 928 907 916 902 546 734 784 868 970 954

On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release > names would > have been nice. We did. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

On 04/02/2015 02:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >> >>> Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release >>> names would >>> have been nice. >>> >> >> We

On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in > /etc/os-release In that particular place it is actually rather important, but that is orthogonal to the ISO name.

On 04/02/2015 04:43 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > >> On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in >>> /etc/os-release >>> >> In that particular place it is actually rather important,

On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large > enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. > Does google hangout work ? we might be able to also setup a phone dial in setup -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

On 04/02/2015 12:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:57:23AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> How, without a cross reference of some sort, do you know if a given >>>> CentOS iso will install on hardware where you know that the needed >>>> driver was added in an RH minor rev? >>> always use the latest one. >> Which, combined

On 04/01/2015 11:45 AM, ????????? ???????? wrote: >> This was discussed on the CentOS-Devel mailing list and approved by the >> CentOS Board. It is what we are using in the future. I suggest you >> become familiar with it. > > Obviously naming conventions should provide for an easy upstream vendor > version reference? does /etc/centos-release-upstream provide you with

you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the iso file name. if you don't like the name, rename it... sheesh. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

Hi everybody, this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to become a Xen.org hosted project. The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy - has requested a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project. In line with Xen Project Governance (see http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular sections -

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

Ok for those of you all up in a tizzy over my subject line, please don't take it literally because I'm certainly not saying that asterisk is the problem here. I just got a little nightmare problem that I need a bit of help figuring out. I installed an asterisk system a few months ago for a client, it has run almost flawlessly with the exception of a few small glitches. However, I got a

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26201 Summary: Some screen garbage, NoAccel and GPU lockup reported with NV4E Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > > wrote: > > >> > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > its been withdrawn upstream. > > given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get > enough attention to