similar to: Googletalk Plugin on CentOS 6.6 x86-64 help

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Googletalk Plugin on CentOS 6.6 x86-64 help"

2015 Mar 14
1
Googletalk Plugin on CentOS 6.6 x86-64 help
On 03/14/15 17:58, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/14/2015 2:48 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> # yum install google-talkplugin_current_x86_64.rpm > > where did that RPM come from ? whomever built it will need to fix it. > > google officially only supports debian/ubuntu, per > https://support.google.com/hangouts/answer/1216376?hl=en > > That rpm came from Google.
2015 Mar 14
0
Googletalk Plugin on CentOS 6.6 x86-64 help
On 3/14/2015 2:48 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > # yum install google-talkplugin_current_x86_64.rpm where did that RPM come from ? whomever built it will need to fix it. google officially only supports debian/ubuntu, per https://support.google.com/hangouts/answer/1216376?hl=en -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
2014 Nov 06
0
Fwd: Fwd: Re: google talk plugin for google hangout not loading(SOLVED)
Hey Bax, Thank you for the help. I've got a 32 bit system so this is the path I needed. If you have a 64 bit system use the link below this one. https://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/rpm/stable/i386/google-talkplugin-5.4.2.0-1.i386.rpm -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] google talk plugin for google hangout not loading Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 01:02:02 +0100 From:
2014 Oct 31
2
google talk plugin for google hangout not loading
Hey All, I found another issue with 6.6 that was working with 6.5. Error: Package: google-talkplugin-5.38.5.0-1.i386 (/google-talkplugin_current_i386) Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****
2016 Jun 28
2
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
[root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin [root at localhost bin]# ./clang ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6:
2016 Jun 28
0
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer libstdc++. Sorry, it would be clearer if I'd have made the package name include "centos6.7". On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > [root at localhost
2016 Sep 22
3
Flash player beta
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to
2016 Sep 22
0
Flash player beta
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail. > innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 >> > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> >> > >> > Has anyone tried the new flash
2016 Jun 28
3
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all? Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it > against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer > libstdc++. > > Sorry, it would be clearer
2014 Jun 30
2
Google Hangout Plugin Does Not Work For Other Users
Hey All, I've got the Google Talk plugin installed at: File: libnpgoogletalk.so Path: /opt/google/talkplugin/libnpgoogletalk.so Version: State: Enabled Version: 5.4.2.0 And the Google Talk Plugin Video Renderer at: File: libnpo1d.so Path: /opt/google/talkplugin/libnpo1d.so Version: State: Enabled Version: 5.4.2.0 When I start of join a Google
2017 Sep 15
0
libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4
On 09/15/2017 03:06 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > Hello All, > > this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now after the release. > I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, including my own laptop. > > We have these repo's enabled: > > repo id repo naam status > base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base 9.591 > beid-release/7
2017 Sep 15
0
libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Richard" <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Vrijdag 15 september 2017 13:03:27 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4 > Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 05:34:11 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
2017 Sep 15
4
libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4
Hello All, this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now after the release. I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, including my own laptop. We have these repo's enabled: repo id repo naam status base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base 9.591 beid-release/7 Belgian eID package archive 68 epel/x86_64 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 11.904 extras/7/x86_64
2016 Nov 20
1
Skype for Centos Desktop
On 11/17/16 22:23, geo wrote: > > > On 11/17/2016 07:47 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 18/11/16 11:01, Liam O'Toole wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17, Rodrigo Pichi?ual Norin >>> <rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I search info in the web about how to install skype on centos 6.5, but >>>> just
2017 Sep 15
2
libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4
> Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 05:34:11 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> > > On 09/15/2017 03:06 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now >> after the release. I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, >> including my own laptop. >>
2009 Sep 18
2
Ruuid missing Gtk glib.dylib
Hi, I get an error indicating a missing library from the package 'Ruuid'. I suppose this means I should install RGtk. I just thought I'd document the error. Maybe a dependency entry is missing? R 2.9.0 OS X 10.5.8 Thanks, - chris > biocLite('Ruuid') Using R version 2.9.0, biocinstall version 2.4.12. Installing Bioconductor version 2.4 packages: [1] "Ruuid"
2015 Aug 25
4
Compile for C6 / glibc
In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on
2018 Jul 13
2
Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the following library failures in 'ldd' output: > ldd libwidevinecdm.so ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by
2017 Nov 23
0
RISC-V LLVM sync-up conference calls
On 14 November 2017 at 16:03, Alex Bradbury <asb at lowrisc.org> wrote: > Dear list, > > At the RISC-V BoF at the LLVM Dev Meeting and the longer working > session the day after, those of us working on RISC-V with LLVM decided > it would be worthwhile to schedule regular sync-up calls in order to > better co-ordinate ongoing work between different developers. This is >
2017 Nov 14
4
RISC-V LLVM sync-up conference calls
Dear list, At the RISC-V BoF at the LLVM Dev Meeting and the longer working session the day after, those of us working on RISC-V with LLVM decided it would be worthwhile to schedule regular sync-up calls in order to better co-ordinate ongoing work between different developers. This is primarily to sync-up, share blocking issues and so on. I understand something similar was done during the