similar to: Help with routing question.

On Wed, February 18, 2015 13:07, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> 2. How does one configure the routing table on network startup to >> specifically detail the route particular addresses are supposed to >> take? >> > > Not exactly sure how routing works with aliases on the same

I want to add the following route command route add -net 192.168.2.0/27 gw 192.168.2.3 via the normal network setup. The result should be the following routing table (the first line): 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 scope link 192.168.2.0/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 192.168.2.0/27 dev xenbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.3 192.168.1.0/24 dev xenbr0

On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> I found: >> >> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html >> >> where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: >> >>

I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.: ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0 But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to make it persistant. I found: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 But this

Hi, I'd want to configure persistent static routes, ie in config files, but I can't configure static routes, I tested: [root at centos7 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/routes-enp0s3 ADDRESS0=10.10.10.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 logs says nothing: ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> Activation (enp0s3) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4

On Thu, February 19, 2015 10:19, James B. Byrne wrote: > > I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: > > ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 > NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 > Which should have been: ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 Sigh. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

Dear Friends I have 2 netcards (eth0 to Internet and eth1 to internal network) in CENTOS 4.2, bit when I boot system the up eth0 and et1i [OK]. When I run ifconfig the eth1 has not IP configure, then I run command ifdown eth1 and ifup eth1, after eth1 is work perfect. Below I show file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for

A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help!!!! I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is also our web and email server. The server has 4 nics. Two are connected to the internet and the

Hi, I'm working with the iproute2/iptables toolset on my CentOS4 server to create custom routing rules. However, I'm a bit at a loss how to create these permanently so that they are automatically reloaded upon reboot of the server. I know that iptables has a config file in /etc/sysconfig/iptables that is loaded by /etc/init.d/iptables startup script. Is there anything that works

Hello List, I have one network card and added two IP-Adresses to it: eth1 192.168.1.1/24 eth1:1 10.1.2.3/24 a want to use static routes on device eth1:1 and added one in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1:1: GATEWAY0=10.1.2.4 ADDRESS0=10.2.2.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 What the network-script should execute in background is: ip route add 10.2.2.0/24 via 10.1.2.4 dev eth1 but it executes

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.: > > ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0 > > But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to > make it persistant. I found: > >

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> >>> I found: >>> >>>

On 03/12/2015 03:51 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I found: >>>> >>>>

Is it possible to have a route stick in the kernel, even if device it points to goes to roller coaster up and down drive. For example. I have an ADSL modem and am doing VPN over it. There's a route needed for VPN added like this: ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 1.2.3.4 src 192.168.2.1 There are two problems with it: a) if ADSL link is down when above command is executed, the route

Hi all, Somebody can explains me how can I configure ipsec-tools package to use private virtual ip address as an openswan does or some doc/howto about it?? I have seen this howto, but doesn't works for me: http://www.howtoforge.com/racoon_roadwarrior_vpn Many thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

Hello, in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 I have this <ifcfg-eth0> ... IPV6INIT=yes IPV6ADDR=prefix::5 IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="prefix::2 prefix::3 prefix::4" IPV6_AUTOCONF=no IPV6_DEFAULTGW=prefix::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 </ifcfg-eth0> when I enter ifconfig the IPv6 addresses are in a different order <ifconfig> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr ... inet addr:...

I have the following networking setup: - eth0 and eth1 corresponding to the physical ports on the host NIC - bond0 which enslaves eth0 + eth1 - br0 which attaches bond0 - xenbr0 - xenbr5 all of which are internal only networks (10.0.0.0; 10.1.1.0; etc) Br0 is used both for the host to access the outside world as well as DomUs acting as gateway machines for each xenbr network. For example the

Paul, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 17/03/16 04:47 PM, paul.greene.va at verizon.net wrote: > > Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing virtual > > machines communicating with each other. > Right, so your VMs are on the same bridge group now (at Layer2 of OSI). > > > > However, any new

Hi, I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route via a second network interface. Given: - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 Where eth0's network is a "back door" to the internet, and eth1's is the "front door", I believe I can

I have centos 64 6.5 I installed bridge-utils I installed tunctl I added BRIDGE=br0 to ifcfg-eth0 I created ifcfg-br0 with correct settings I did service network restart and I get an error about br0 not present. When I plug in the second network (USB to ethernet) It detects as eth1 What do I need to change to get this to work. Thanks, jerry