similar to: Setting up new spacewalk server

On 2/17/2015 12:31 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-02-17 22:26 GMT+02:00 Eckert, Doug<doug.eckert at dowjones.com>: > >> >We have a DHCP/PXE server in a build environment, which is separate from >> >our Spacewalk v1.5 server. We direct builds to Satellite or Spacewalk based >> >as needed. It contains initrd & vmlinuz files for each version/arch we

ISO pulled from http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso # df -h /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /var/ISO/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso 339M 339M 0 100% /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 # find /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 -name initr\* /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/isolinux/initrd.img #

Trying to use "minimal" ISOs The 64-bit CEL 7.0 and 6.6 look ok so far. but when I try to set up the CEL 6.6 i386, but I get the following - The initrd could not be found at the specified location: /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/images/pxeboot/initrd.img It does have the initrd.img file in .../isolinux, but for some reason, not in .../images/pxeboot On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at

2015-02-17 22:26 GMT+02:00 Eckert, Doug <doug.eckert at dowjones.com>: > We have a DHCP/PXE server in a build environment, which is separate from > our Spacewalk v1.5 server. We direct builds to Satellite or Spacewalk based > as needed. It contains initrd & vmlinuz files for each version/arch we > currently deploy for both RHEL & CEL. > > I'd like to keep the

I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough of them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from an internal source. I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may be a way to allow Windows admins here (familiar with WSUS) to update Linux boxes. A local repo might be easier to set up, but (as with Spacewalk) it seems like

Hi, I would like to contribute a howto page about the configuration of Spacewalk for package management under CentOS 5. Spacewalk is the upstream project for the source of RedHat Network Satellite. It provides a management interface for software updates across registered servers and desktops. Here is were I would like to put this page: <http://www.redhat.com/red_hat_network/>

On 12/15/2015 02:07 PM, Bill Howe wrote: > Chris, > > I recommend you look into: > > - Spacewalk: Centralized system management utility ( > http://spacewalk.redhat.com/) > - Errata update tool: > https://github.com/mike-wendt/spacewalk-centos-errata > - CentOS repos do not include the errata information in the repo > itself (EPEL does include

I am a little new to managing large numbers of CentOS/RHEL servers and was wondering what you experienced sysadmins prefer, Spacewalk or Puppet? Thanks, Dan Burkland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091103/de975d32/attachment-0004.html>

Hi Everyone, Since Satellite 6 is an amalgam of other F/OSS projects and is no longer solely based on Spacewalk, is a new upstream project for Satellite 6 going to be created? BEtter yet, is a new upstream project already available? Ranbir -- Kanwar R.S. Sandhu

Hello Everyone I'm looking into the best way to have locked version repos for my CentOS systems. The systems are all set up with Chef and have a couple different recopies/roles. I'd like to have locked version repos for each role with tested RPMs. Then perhaps quarterly apply any updates. It would be nice to have something showing which updates are available for these locked repos.

Dear Patrice, I have noticed that you are referencing to the Stahnma repository for Spacewalk Client Tools. These are quite old and I would suggest to use the tools from: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum instead. Mr. Suchy already pushed some of the packages to Fedora/EPEL so they might be available there, soon. Besides that the Spacewalk Team is thinking about a split between client/server on

On 2015-07-22 13:34, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > The upstream project is called Katello, http://www.katello.org/ > It has nothing to do with Spacewalk as far as I can tell. Katello is just one piece. Satellite 6 also integrates Candlepin, Puppet and more. What I'm wondering is if the entire set of software - Satellite 6 as one piece - is going to get a new upstream project. > I have

Marcus Moeller wrote : > [...] > We have similar issues with the Spacewalk > documentation (another thread :?). It would be great to have something > like an installation guide covering the CentOS specific aspects and > links to the upstream docs. > > For Spacewalk e.g., I have started to improve the 'official' upstream > docs a bit (which are already quite good),

Hello, Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on CentOS 5 or 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello, When I try to sync CentOS 6 from different ftp mirrors using spacewalk command "spacewalk-repo-sync" I get this message " 'Unable to load package', 'Invalid information uploaded to the server' " for 38 packages. When I check, these 38 packages are not named correctly. For example, sync command is looking for

Hi I have been trying to get puppet working with kickstart. I am trying to install Hadoop on the nodes. Installing puppet from kickstart work and when the machine restarts, certificates are pulled down and hadoop user is created and files are extracted. I want all the user creation etc to be done before the machine reboots so that I can set up init.d scripts to do a start of hadoop . So I

Anyone here use spacewalk as opposed other foss apps to accomplish the same thing? Any opinions? Thanks, jlc

Dear all, HugoDoria's last two edits on the Spacewalk page (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PackageManagement/Spacewalk) have removed line feeds from all preformatted text, as well as pointed to some RHEL6 packages on a page written for CentOS 5. I propose that the page be reverted backed to revision 82. Regards, Timothy

Are/we /is CentOS planning to integrate spacewalk? I am currently looking at it... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090216/aa6f42a3/attachment.html

Hi List Does anyone have any good way to configure centos 4 machines for Spacewalk? Kind regards Per Qvindesland