similar to: DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue

Lucian, So far here is the best we could find out: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084747 Testing to see if this is the solution; so far it seems to be. Cheers, Boris. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) > > PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. > >

Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January,

Thanks for getting back with the "solution". You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating since last year. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at

Hello listmates, Somehow or other my DNS services that are part of the ndjbdns-1.06-1.el7.x86_64 package would not start properly at startup. When I then start them up using systemctl: systemctl start dnscache systemctl start tinydns they start just fine. >From the log I got the following for tinydns: Oct 24 15:01:43 ns99 tinydns[1867]: tinydns: version 1.06: starting: Oct-24 2014 15:01:43

Hi there, I've been a happy djbdns+tinydns user for many, many years. I want to keep using it, so answers of the form "bletch! Use ISC BIND the way BSD intended" will be ignored :-) Having said that, one annoying consequence of my transition some time ago to using ntpd, rather than just setting the clock once-off with ntpdate as I used to, is that the /etc/rc.d mechanism starts

Hello all, I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running on CentOS 7. So far I have wirtten the djbdns.service and djbdns.socket files. The sockets (TCP and UDP 53) for some reason would not start and I don't know how to debug that; the service does start but only when I start it manually by running systemctl start djbdns So, I am a real noob when it comes to

Hi I''m quite new to the art of writing puppet manifest, but the more I see, the more I like it :-) I''m trying to write a djbdns dnscache module. dnscache configuration is spread in several files, for instance the ip addresses allowed to query the cache each have a file in dnscache/root/ip/ whose filename is the address. I''m trying to automate the creations of those

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> wrote: > I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses > TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas > internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really > don't want to use BIND. > > Should my DHCP server send

Hi, I try dig google for this question and found little notes in there, I already try it on my VPS machine and end up with nothing working... I'm using CentOS 4.6 in VPS (openvz), at first i'm trying BIND and it's just nice, and now i want to try djbdns... Is it djbdns working in VPS ? if not, is there anything that i can work on it ? i can only afford VPS for now. Thank you...

It''s now been over a week, and we are nearly at wits end trying to track down our performance issues here. We now have a P3/667 (single CPU! SMP was definitely the source of previous lockups) with 256Mb RAM. It is running along with a load avg of less than 0.1 even at peak times. Max ip_conntrack is around 1500-2000. Sounds fine, but, we have also tried 3 different squid proxies (2

Good morning: We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really had any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on rpmforge are for red hat

Can anyone point me to a good one for use? It would be cool if it was from a repo for updates, etc. Thanks in advance! Dustin

I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really don't want to use BIND. Should my DHCP server send ddns updates to Samba's internal DNS for client leases? Thanks, -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member Koozali

Please specify the Samba version you are running - winbindd in 2.2.2 had a *big* memory leak which would certainly eat all your memory over three days on a moderately busy server. The more work winbindd does the more memory it chews - which might explain the end of day incidents. Try using 'M' in Top to get an idea of who is eating the memory. Noel There is no indication in TOP as to

I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox (and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on opendns.com web pages, instead of at the web site I'm trying to get to. My ISP, the phone company,

If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Jim Van Eeckhoutte" <jim@vaneeckhoutte.com> Reply-To: <jim@vaneeckhoutte.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:14 -0700 this is shorewall status output: tcp 6 431899 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.20.5 dst=64.4.12.45 sport=2185 dport=1863 src=64.4.12.45 dst=63.25.123.58 sport=1863 dport=2185 [ASSURED] use=1

On 07/05/2019 01:43 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 18:59, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> Is it necessary to use Samba's DNS when configuring as a domain >> controller?? Can a DNS server be used on a different machine? >> > The dns server must be authoritative for the AD dns domain but you do > not need to use the Samba internal dns

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > found 655714 1.3-15 Bug #655714 [xcp-squeezed] xcp-squeezed: fails to install due to insserv rejecting the script header Bug Marked as found in versions xen-api/1.3-15. > found 582755 1:1.05-9~exp1 Bug #582755 [dnscache-run] Please make dnscache-run compatible with resolvconf Bug Marked as found in versions djbdns/1:1.05-9~exp1. >

On 07/05/2019 02:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 20:03, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was >>> hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC >>> work right now.? Need to update that.