similar to: Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes

Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally handle all the trademark usage queries.) The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ That document should give the GNOME project all of the authorization and guidelines on how to use and not use the CentOS marks. Fabiano -- if you have any further questions, you may also

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]:

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

Karsten, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally > handle all the trademark usage queries.) > > The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > That document should give the GNOME project all of the

Bumping this thread in the hopes that we can get an official opinion from someone on the board. In particular, the guidelines at https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo seem to indicate that we're not supposed to use the logo without the wordmark, but we do that all the time, even on official swag. What's the official ruling, and who can we go to for further clarification? --Rich

Hi all, There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME Project's use with GNOME Boxes. I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take more time. Best regards, - Karsten On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > People, > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2480 Bug ID: 2480 Summary: Support a list of sockets on SSH_AUTH_SOCK Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs

Howdy! I've been working on a prototype that allows to do ssh-agent forward between a guest, using SPICE, and a spice client (remote-viewer/virt-viewer/spicy) The whole idea is to have something similar to "ssh -A guest", but integrated with the desktop environment. As a proof of concept I wrote a standalone ssh-agent that _unlink_ the current running agent in the guest machine and

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: >> A few possible solutions for this would involve a way to support more >> than one agent, talking to both (the local one and the spice one), >> merging then their responses and returning it to any application who >> sent the request. Note that would be really nice if

The idea behind this change is to add support for different "ssh-agents" being able to run at the same time. It does not change the current behaviour of the ssh-agent (which will set SSH_AUTH_SOCK just for itself). Neither does it change the behaviour of SSH_AGENT_PID (which still supports only one pid). The new implementation will go through the list of sockets (which are separated by a

Hello OpenSSH, wolfSSL will be at FOSDEM 2016 in Brussels on the 30th and 31st of January. We are interested in getting together in person with any developers from OpenSSH to talk about the recent port of wolfSSL to OpenSSH. Please contact us at info at wolfssl.com if you are interested in setting up a meeting. Thank you all for your time. Best Regards, wolfSSL

El 18/9/18 a las 20:07, Karsten Wade escribi?: > On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: >> My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. >> However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and >> we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] >> >> Would that be possible? As far as I could

On 18/09/18 14:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > Hmm. I matched the existing banner size identically as I assumed it was > correct. There are in fact 4 banners now on random rotate. > I'm not a designer, but what about using something that have some kind of "centos look-n-feel" at the design level ? What about the common banner we use almost everywhere, including wiki ? Just my

Hey While trying to get some svg files of the CentOS logo I found that [1] can't load the images. The urls are : http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-new-2.png http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-logo-3.png http://files.squirtgun.ca//CentOS/images/logos/centosLogoRound_v001.jpg Maybe someone can fix this. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Logo Cheers Didi ---- My www page:

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 9/18/18 8:27 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > On 18/09/18 14:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> Hmm. I matched the existing banner size identically as I assumed it was > >> correct. There are in fact 4 banners now on random rotate. > >> > > I'm not a designer, but what about

** Delivery incomplete ** There was a temporary problem delivering your message to curtiskwong101 at gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be notified if the delivery fails permanently. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20180919/7249d4a2/attachment-0002.html>

Hello Guys I have problem with internet bank. I have 2 Internet links balancing mode, thus the bank is charging connection down. I tried to force Internet traffic (port 80 and 443) for only a link, however it did not work. How do I make a setting to force the connection to these ports for a specific link. Note: I can not use the file as route_rules have neither the source IP (ltsp) nor of

On 07/25/2017 10:03 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Promo >> >> Thanks! >> >> --Rich > > You should have edit rights everything under >

I'm hoping to update https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup and bring it more in line with reality. As such, can I please get edit rights to https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup and the docs under that? Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com RDO Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org @RDOCommunity

Hi everybody! I've been noticing some strange entries in samba/utmp. I have a lot of 00:00 timed sessions. But the worst problem is that i found some conflicting information. Since windows doesn't allow concurrent login sessions, I think utmp should not have generated the following entries. liana smb/2 192.168.0.207 Fri Sep 2 18:43 - 00:52 (06:08) rodrigobaso